Objective socioeconomic status, subjective social status, and mental disorders in Iranian mental health survey (IranMHS): A mediation analysis.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2024.12.019
Nastaran Nasirpour, Ramin Mojtabai, Ebtesam Savari, Ahmad Hajebi, Afarin Rahimi-Movaghar, Abbas Motevalian
{"title":"Objective socioeconomic status, subjective social status, and mental disorders in Iranian mental health survey (IranMHS): A mediation analysis.","authors":"Nastaran Nasirpour, Ramin Mojtabai, Ebtesam Savari, Ahmad Hajebi, Afarin Rahimi-Movaghar, Abbas Motevalian","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2024.12.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is ample evidence that socioeconomic status, objectively quantified by tangible resources, impacts mental health outcomes. However, the psychosocial mechanism linking objective socioeconomic status (OSS) with mental health is not clear. This study examined to what extent associations between OSS and the twelve-month prevalence of mental disorders, are mediated by the individual perception of social conditions-the subjective social status (SSS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed data from the Iranian Mental Health Survey (IranMHS), collected through interviews with 7886 Iranian adults. We used the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1) to assess any mental disorder, any anxiety disorder, and any major depressive disorder (MDD). We measured OSS based on education, occupation, wealth, and a composite OSS index, while SSS was evaluated using the MacArthur scale. We investigated the indirect associations and stratified the analyses by gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this national sample, 4499 (57.0 %) were women, 4380 (55.5 %) were urban, and the mean (SE) age was 31.7 (0.2) years. SSS had a partial to full mediating effect. Specifically, there were significant indirect effects for the impact of wealth (mediation percentage: 78.9 %), education (73.3 %), OSS index (56.0 %), and occupation (33.3 %) on any mental disorder through SSS.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The cross-sectional nature of the data presents constraints in establishing causal relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the role of SSS as the psychosocial mechanism linking OSS with mental disorders. A better understanding of the social factors that influence the association between OSS and SSS may enhance our insight into the mental health effects of socioeconomic status.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"279-286"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.12.019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is ample evidence that socioeconomic status, objectively quantified by tangible resources, impacts mental health outcomes. However, the psychosocial mechanism linking objective socioeconomic status (OSS) with mental health is not clear. This study examined to what extent associations between OSS and the twelve-month prevalence of mental disorders, are mediated by the individual perception of social conditions-the subjective social status (SSS).

Methods: We employed data from the Iranian Mental Health Survey (IranMHS), collected through interviews with 7886 Iranian adults. We used the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1) to assess any mental disorder, any anxiety disorder, and any major depressive disorder (MDD). We measured OSS based on education, occupation, wealth, and a composite OSS index, while SSS was evaluated using the MacArthur scale. We investigated the indirect associations and stratified the analyses by gender.

Results: In this national sample, 4499 (57.0 %) were women, 4380 (55.5 %) were urban, and the mean (SE) age was 31.7 (0.2) years. SSS had a partial to full mediating effect. Specifically, there were significant indirect effects for the impact of wealth (mediation percentage: 78.9 %), education (73.3 %), OSS index (56.0 %), and occupation (33.3 %) on any mental disorder through SSS.

Limitations: The cross-sectional nature of the data presents constraints in establishing causal relationships.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the role of SSS as the psychosocial mechanism linking OSS with mental disorders. A better understanding of the social factors that influence the association between OSS and SSS may enhance our insight into the mental health effects of socioeconomic status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗人心理健康调查(IranMHS)中的客观社会经济地位、主观社会地位和精神障碍:中介分析
背景:有充分的证据表明,社会经济地位,客观量化的有形资源,影响心理健康结果。然而,客观社会经济地位(OSS)与心理健康之间的社会心理机制尚不清楚。本研究考察了个体对社会状况的感知——主观社会地位(SSS)——在多大程度上介导了OSS与精神障碍12个月患病率之间的联系。方法:我们采用伊朗心理健康调查(IranMHS)的数据,通过对7886名伊朗成年人的访谈收集。我们使用综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI 2.1)来评估任何精神障碍、任何焦虑障碍和任何重度抑郁症(MDD)。我们根据教育、职业、财富和综合OSS指数来衡量OSS,而SSS则使用麦克阿瑟量表进行评估。我们调查了间接关联,并按性别进行了分层分析。结果:女性4499例(57.0 %),城市4380例(55.5 %),平均(SE)年龄31.7(0.2)岁。SSS有部分或完全的调节作用。具体而言,财富(调解百分比:78.9% %)、教育(73.3 %)、OSS指数(56.0% %)和职业(33.3% %)通过SSS对任何精神障碍的影响存在显著的间接影响。局限性:数据的横断面性质对建立因果关系提出了限制。结论:我们的研究结果强调了SSS作为将OSS与精神障碍联系起来的社会心理机制的作用。更好地理解影响OSS和SSS之间关系的社会因素可能会增强我们对社会经济地位对心理健康影响的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
期刊最新文献
Attention and emotion in adolescents with ADHD; a time-varying functional connectivity study. Loneliness partially mediates the relationship between Internet access and cognitive function in late adulthood: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Middle frontal gyrus volume mediates the relationship between interleukin-1β and antidepressant response in major depressive disorder. Multiple pathways to suicide: A network analysis based on three components of psychological pain. Emptiness in patients with borderline personality disorder: Severity and predictors of outcome over 24 years of prospective follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1