Safety and Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Patients With Chronic Liver Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ijph.2024.1605295
Guanglin Xiao, Taiyu He, Biqiong Zhang, Ziqiao Yang, Ning Ling, Min Chen, Dazhi Zhang, Peng Hu, Gaoli Zhang, Mingli Peng, Dachuan Cai, Hong Ren
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Patients With Chronic Liver Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Guanglin Xiao, Taiyu He, Biqiong Zhang, Ziqiao Yang, Ning Ling, Min Chen, Dazhi Zhang, Peng Hu, Gaoli Zhang, Mingli Peng, Dachuan Cai, Hong Ren","doi":"10.3389/ijph.2024.1605295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from 2020 to 2024. Data was extracted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The random-effects model (when I<sup>2</sup> ≥ 50%) or fixed effect model (I<sup>2</sup> < 50%) was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>29 studies were included in this review. Compared to healthy controls (HCs), patients with CLD had a higher incidence of mild adverse events (RR = 1.60, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while the incidence of severe adverse events was similar (RR = 1.08, <i>p</i> = 0.92). Seropositivity rates of three antibodies in patients were lower than in HCs [neutralizing antibody (RR = 0.86, <i>p</i> = 0.002), anti-spike antibody (RR = 0.97, <i>p</i> = 0.06) and anti-receptor binding domain antibody (RR = 0.95, <i>p</i> = 0.04)]. Compared to unvaccinated patients, vaccinated patients had lower rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization and death (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 vaccines showed good safety and efficacy in CLD patients, but antibody response appeared to be decreased. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and booster doses should be given priority in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14322,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health","volume":"69 ","pages":"1605295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2024.1605295","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This review aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD).

Methods: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from 2020 to 2024. Data was extracted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The random-effects model (when I2 ≥ 50%) or fixed effect model (I2 < 50%) was used.

Results: 29 studies were included in this review. Compared to healthy controls (HCs), patients with CLD had a higher incidence of mild adverse events (RR = 1.60, p < 0.001), while the incidence of severe adverse events was similar (RR = 1.08, p = 0.92). Seropositivity rates of three antibodies in patients were lower than in HCs [neutralizing antibody (RR = 0.86, p = 0.002), anti-spike antibody (RR = 0.97, p = 0.06) and anti-receptor binding domain antibody (RR = 0.95, p = 0.04)]. Compared to unvaccinated patients, vaccinated patients had lower rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization and death (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines showed good safety and efficacy in CLD patients, but antibody response appeared to be decreased. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and booster doses should be given priority in this vulnerable population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性肝病患者SARS-CoV-2疫苗的安全性和有效性:系统评价和meta分析
目的:本综述旨在评估SARS-CoV-2疫苗在慢性肝病(CLD)患者中的安全性和有效性。方法:检索2020 - 2024年Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、PubMed、Embase和Web of Science。根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目提取数据。采用随机效应模型(I2≥50%)或固定效应模型(I2 < 50%)。结果:本综述纳入了29项研究。与健康对照组(HCs)相比,CLD患者轻度不良事件发生率较高(RR = 1.60, p < 0.001),严重不良事件发生率相似(RR = 1.08, p = 0.92)。患者3种抗体的血清阳性率均低于hc[中和抗体(RR = 0.86, p = 0.002)、抗尖峰抗体(RR = 0.97, p = 0.06)和抗受体结合域抗体(RR = 0.95, p = 0.04)]。与未接种疫苗的患者相比,接种疫苗的患者SARS-CoV-2感染率、住院率和死亡率均低于未接种疫苗的患者(p≤0.05)。结论:SARS-CoV-2疫苗在CLD患者中具有良好的安全性和有效性,但抗体反应有所下降。因此,应优先在这一脆弱人群中接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗和加强剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Public Health
International Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
269
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Public Health publishes scientific articles relevant to global public health, from different countries and cultures, and assembles them into issues that raise awareness and understanding of public health problems and solutions. The Journal welcomes submissions of original research, critical and relevant reviews, methodological papers and manuscripts that emphasize theoretical content. IJPH sometimes publishes commentaries and opinions. Special issues highlight key areas of current research. The Editorial Board''s mission is to provide a thoughtful forum for contemporary issues and challenges in global public health research and practice.
期刊最新文献
Methodological Considerations and Future Directions in Mental Health Multimorbidity Research: Response to Andreeva et al. Challenges to Achieving Surgical Equity in Slums. Mental Health Assessment of the Population: Study Protocol of the MAP Research Program in Ukraine (MAP-U) and in Zurich (MAP-Z). Methodological Approaches to Comparative Trend Analyses: The Case of Adolescent Toothbrushing. Medical Aid in Dying: A Societal Challenge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1