Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Journal of Immunotherapy Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1097/CJI.0000000000000545
Wenhui Wang, Xiaoning Bi, Ye Feng, Xue Ming, Guo Saina, Wang Kun, Bin Ling, Huan Yu
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Wenhui Wang, Xiaoning Bi, Ye Feng, Xue Ming, Guo Saina, Wang Kun, Bin Ling, Huan Yu","doi":"10.1097/CJI.0000000000000545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with histologically proven advanced cervical cancer. MEDLINE (through PubMed), Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched. Eligible studies were clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety on ICIs in patients with confirmed advanced cervical cancer. Response rates and adverse events rates were pooled using either a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model based on the I2 value. A total of 12 clinical trials with 523 women diagnosed with advanced cervical cancer were included. Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors were identified. The pooled objective response (OR) rate, complete response (CR) rate, partial response (PR) rate, and stable disease (SD) rate of PD1 antibodies were 0.24 (95% CIs: 0.11-0.39; I2=90%, P<0.01), 0.03 (95% CIs: 0.02-0.05; I2=0%, P =0.92), 0.20 (95% CIs: 0.08-0.36; I2=91%, P<0.01), 0.31 (95% CIs: 0.23-0.40; I2=79%, P<0.01), respectively. Adverse events (AEs) rate of any grade was 0.81 (95% CIs: 0.72-0.88; I2=83%, P<0.01). This study indicates that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors reveal acceptable clinical responses and tolerable adverse events in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. Well-designed clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15996,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CJI.0000000000000545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with histologically proven advanced cervical cancer. MEDLINE (through PubMed), Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched. Eligible studies were clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety on ICIs in patients with confirmed advanced cervical cancer. Response rates and adverse events rates were pooled using either a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model based on the I2 value. A total of 12 clinical trials with 523 women diagnosed with advanced cervical cancer were included. Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors were identified. The pooled objective response (OR) rate, complete response (CR) rate, partial response (PR) rate, and stable disease (SD) rate of PD1 antibodies were 0.24 (95% CIs: 0.11-0.39; I2=90%, P<0.01), 0.03 (95% CIs: 0.02-0.05; I2=0%, P =0.92), 0.20 (95% CIs: 0.08-0.36; I2=91%, P<0.01), 0.31 (95% CIs: 0.23-0.40; I2=79%, P<0.01), respectively. Adverse events (AEs) rate of any grade was 0.81 (95% CIs: 0.72-0.88; I2=83%, P<0.01). This study indicates that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors reveal acceptable clinical responses and tolerable adverse events in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. Well-designed clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期宫颈癌的疗效和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析
本研究旨在评估免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在组织学证实的晚期宫颈癌患者中的疗效和安全性。对MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面检索。符合条件的研究是研究晚期宫颈癌患者使用ICIs的有效性和安全性的临床试验。采用随机效应模型或基于I2值的固定效应模型汇总反应率和不良事件发生率。共纳入了12项临床试验,涉及523名诊断为晚期宫颈癌的妇女。鉴定出程序性细胞死亡-1 (PD-1)/程序性细胞死亡配体-1 (PD-L1)和细胞毒性t淋巴细胞相关蛋白4 (CTLA-4)抑制剂。PD1抗体的综合客观缓解(OR)率、完全缓解(CR)率、部分缓解(PR)率和疾病稳定(SD)率为0.24 (95% ci: 0.11-0.39;I2 = 90%, P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Immunotherapy
Journal of Immunotherapy 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Immunotherapy features rapid publication of articles on immunomodulators, lymphokines, antibodies, cells, and cell products in cancer biology and therapy. Laboratory and preclinical studies, as well as investigative clinical reports, are presented. The journal emphasizes basic mechanisms and methods for the rapid transfer of technology from the laboratory to the clinic. JIT contains full-length articles, review articles, and short communications.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive Analysis of a Dendritic Cell Marker Genes Signature to Predict Prognosis and Immunotherapy Response in Lung Adenocarcinoma. RAD51 Expression as a Biomarker to Predict Efficacy of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and PD-L1 Blockade for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Corneal Transplant Rejection Following Durvalumab Therapy in a Patient With NSCLC: A Case Report. Brief Communication on MAGE-A4 and Coexpression of Cancer Testis Antigens in Metastatic Synovial Sarcomas: Considerations for Development of Immunotherapeutics. Brief Communication: Combination of an MIP3α-Antigen Fusion Therapeutic DNA Vaccine With Treatments of IFNα and 5-Aza-2'Deoxycytidine Enhances Activated Effector CD8+ T Cells Expressing CD11c in the B16F10 Melanoma Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1