Usefulness of simplified comprehensive geriatric assessment as a pre-ERCP screening for the elderly.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1002/jhbp.12093
Shuzo Nomura, Kei Saito, Mariko Fujisawa, Mai Kitahara, Noriyuki Kuniyoshi, Hiroo Imazu, Hirofumi Kogure
{"title":"Usefulness of simplified comprehensive geriatric assessment as a pre-ERCP screening for the elderly.","authors":"Shuzo Nomura, Kei Saito, Mariko Fujisawa, Mai Kitahara, Noriyuki Kuniyoshi, Hiroo Imazu, Hirofumi Kogure","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is often performed in elderly patients for stone removal and biliary drainage following common bile duct stones or malignant biliary obstruction. Safety in ERCP should be considered in elderly patients due to complications and decreased activities of daily living (ADL), but there are no adequate pretest evaluation criteria. In recent years, the usefulness of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for planning treatment and predicting prognosis has been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent ERCP at our institution between October 2021 and June 2023. The relationship between CGA and ERCP outcomes was examined by dividing CGA scores into three groups (Group A; score 0, Group B; score 1-4, Group C; score 5-7) among patients 65 years of age and older. Risk factors for prolonged hospitalization were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 388 patients, 290 were 65 or older with a CGA score. The median length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the higher CGA7 scores group (5 vs. 8 vs. 15 days, p < .01). There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events (p = .54) and median total procedure time (p = .35). In univariate and multivariate analysis, higher CGA score groups were significant risk factors for a prolonged hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CGA appears to be a valuable tool for preadmission screening in elderly patients undergoing ERCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is often performed in elderly patients for stone removal and biliary drainage following common bile duct stones or malignant biliary obstruction. Safety in ERCP should be considered in elderly patients due to complications and decreased activities of daily living (ADL), but there are no adequate pretest evaluation criteria. In recent years, the usefulness of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for planning treatment and predicting prognosis has been reported.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent ERCP at our institution between October 2021 and June 2023. The relationship between CGA and ERCP outcomes was examined by dividing CGA scores into three groups (Group A; score 0, Group B; score 1-4, Group C; score 5-7) among patients 65 years of age and older. Risk factors for prolonged hospitalization were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results: Of the 388 patients, 290 were 65 or older with a CGA score. The median length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the higher CGA7 scores group (5 vs. 8 vs. 15 days, p < .01). There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events (p = .54) and median total procedure time (p = .35). In univariate and multivariate analysis, higher CGA score groups were significant risk factors for a prolonged hospital stay.

Conclusions: CGA appears to be a valuable tool for preadmission screening in elderly patients undergoing ERCP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Utility and safety of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation with small-incision sphincterotomy for small bile duct stones: A randomized controlled trial. It is time for reform: Results from a questionnaire survey on the current status of next generation HBP surgeons in Japan. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy needle can facilitate histological diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis. Usefulness of simplified comprehensive geriatric assessment as a pre-ERCP screening for the elderly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1