Lisa Wolf, Altair Delao, Francine M Jodelka, Claire Simon
{"title":"Determining Emergency Severity Index Acuity: Key Triage Elements Identified by Emergency Nurses.","authors":"Lisa Wolf, Altair Delao, Francine M Jodelka, Claire Simon","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The conflation of mandated screening question data collection with patient assessment at the initial triage encounter challenges the ability of the emergency nurse to identify patients at risk for deterioration rapidly and accurately. Further, inexperienced triage nurses are generally challenged in differentiating between questions that establish stability and questions that meet other requirements. The aims of the study included exploration of how triage nurses identified critical data elements to facilitate more rapid and accurate patient triage and Emergency Severity Index acuity assignment, perceptions of appropriate location of assessment elements, and identifying common triage processes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative descriptive exploratory study using survey data was used to address study aims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants identified the following elements appropriate to triage as chief complaint, vital signs, allergies (and latex allergy), pain/pain description, weight, history of present illness, suicide risk, preferred language, Glasgow Coma Scale, pregnancy status/last menstrual period, travel history, infectious diseases, arrival method, height, and use of blood thinners. All other screenings were identified as \"belonging\" during provision of care, at discharge, or never.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Emergency nurses identified critical triage data necessary to assign an Emergency Severity Index level. We recommend that future research focus on evaluation of a triage process that removes screening not directly related to the triage decision in terms of nursing accuracy in assigning an Emergency Severity Index level and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.11.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The conflation of mandated screening question data collection with patient assessment at the initial triage encounter challenges the ability of the emergency nurse to identify patients at risk for deterioration rapidly and accurately. Further, inexperienced triage nurses are generally challenged in differentiating between questions that establish stability and questions that meet other requirements. The aims of the study included exploration of how triage nurses identified critical data elements to facilitate more rapid and accurate patient triage and Emergency Severity Index acuity assignment, perceptions of appropriate location of assessment elements, and identifying common triage processes.
Methods: A quantitative descriptive exploratory study using survey data was used to address study aims.
Results: Participants identified the following elements appropriate to triage as chief complaint, vital signs, allergies (and latex allergy), pain/pain description, weight, history of present illness, suicide risk, preferred language, Glasgow Coma Scale, pregnancy status/last menstrual period, travel history, infectious diseases, arrival method, height, and use of blood thinners. All other screenings were identified as "belonging" during provision of care, at discharge, or never.
Discussion: Emergency nurses identified critical triage data necessary to assign an Emergency Severity Index level. We recommend that future research focus on evaluation of a triage process that removes screening not directly related to the triage decision in terms of nursing accuracy in assigning an Emergency Severity Index level and patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice.
The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics.
The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.