Determining Emergency Severity Index Acuity: Key Triage Elements Identified by Emergency Nurses.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2024.11.003
Lisa Wolf, Altair Delao, Francine M Jodelka, Claire Simon
{"title":"Determining Emergency Severity Index Acuity: Key Triage Elements Identified by Emergency Nurses.","authors":"Lisa Wolf, Altair Delao, Francine M Jodelka, Claire Simon","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The conflation of mandated screening question data collection with patient assessment at the initial triage encounter challenges the ability of the emergency nurse to identify patients at risk for deterioration rapidly and accurately. Further, inexperienced triage nurses are generally challenged in differentiating between questions that establish stability and questions that meet other requirements. The aims of the study included exploration of how triage nurses identified critical data elements to facilitate more rapid and accurate patient triage and Emergency Severity Index acuity assignment, perceptions of appropriate location of assessment elements, and identifying common triage processes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative descriptive exploratory study using survey data was used to address study aims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants identified the following elements appropriate to triage as chief complaint, vital signs, allergies (and latex allergy), pain/pain description, weight, history of present illness, suicide risk, preferred language, Glasgow Coma Scale, pregnancy status/last menstrual period, travel history, infectious diseases, arrival method, height, and use of blood thinners. All other screenings were identified as \"belonging\" during provision of care, at discharge, or never.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Emergency nurses identified critical triage data necessary to assign an Emergency Severity Index level. We recommend that future research focus on evaluation of a triage process that removes screening not directly related to the triage decision in terms of nursing accuracy in assigning an Emergency Severity Index level and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.11.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The conflation of mandated screening question data collection with patient assessment at the initial triage encounter challenges the ability of the emergency nurse to identify patients at risk for deterioration rapidly and accurately. Further, inexperienced triage nurses are generally challenged in differentiating between questions that establish stability and questions that meet other requirements. The aims of the study included exploration of how triage nurses identified critical data elements to facilitate more rapid and accurate patient triage and Emergency Severity Index acuity assignment, perceptions of appropriate location of assessment elements, and identifying common triage processes.

Methods: A quantitative descriptive exploratory study using survey data was used to address study aims.

Results: Participants identified the following elements appropriate to triage as chief complaint, vital signs, allergies (and latex allergy), pain/pain description, weight, history of present illness, suicide risk, preferred language, Glasgow Coma Scale, pregnancy status/last menstrual period, travel history, infectious diseases, arrival method, height, and use of blood thinners. All other screenings were identified as "belonging" during provision of care, at discharge, or never.

Discussion: Emergency nurses identified critical triage data necessary to assign an Emergency Severity Index level. We recommend that future research focus on evaluation of a triage process that removes screening not directly related to the triage decision in terms of nursing accuracy in assigning an Emergency Severity Index level and patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
期刊最新文献
Emergency Nurses' Perspectives on Adopting Geriatric Screenings for Cognitive Impairment: A Qualitative Study. Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner's Confidence to Care for Black, Indigenous, and Transgender Survivors: Development and Preliminary Content Validity of Practice Vignettes. The Impact of HIRAID Implementation on the Accuracy of Emergency Nurse Documentation in Australian Rural Emergency Departments: A Multicenter Quasi-Experimental Study. Psychological Distress and the Needs of Family Members of Critically Ill Patients in Emergency Departments During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study. Attitudes and Barriers of Emergency Nurses and Physicians Toward Family Presence During Resuscitation in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1