Transcriptome Comparison between Resistant and Susceptible Soybean Cultivars in Response to Inoculation of Phytophthora sojae.

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES Plant Pathology Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.5423/PPJ.OA.09.2024.0154
Sangrea Shim, In-Jeong Kang, Hee Jin You, Hangil Kim, Sungwoo Lee
{"title":"Transcriptome Comparison between Resistant and Susceptible Soybean Cultivars in Response to Inoculation of Phytophthora sojae.","authors":"Sangrea Shim, In-Jeong Kang, Hee Jin You, Hangil Kim, Sungwoo Lee","doi":"10.5423/PPJ.OA.09.2024.0154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phytophthora root and stem rot, caused by Phytophthora sojae, considerably reduces soybean yield worldwide. Our previous study identified two genomic regions on chromosome 18 (2.1-2.6 and 53.1-53.3 Mbp) that confer resistance to the P. sojae isolate 2457, through linkage analysis using progenies derived from the Daepung × Socheong2 population. These two regions contained 51 and 19 annotated genes, respectively. However, the specific gene responsible for resistance to P. sojae isolate 2457 has yet to be identified. In this study, we performed a comparative transcriptomic analysis of Socheong2 and Daepung, two Korean soybean varieties identified as resistant and susceptible to P. sojae isolate 2457, respectively. RNA sequencing was conducted on tissue samples collected at 0, 6, and 12 hours after inoculation (HAI), and significant differences in the expression of defense-related genes were observed across time points and between the two cultivars. Genes associated with the jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, ethylene, and systemic acquired resistance pathways were upregulated in both cultivars at 6 and 12 HAI compared to 0 HAI, with these biological processes were more strongly upregulated in Socheong2 compared to Daepung at 6 and 12 HAI. A comparison of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and candidate genes within the previously identified QTL regions revealed an ortholog of the HS1 PRO-1 2 gene from Arabidopsis thaliana among the upregulated DEGs in Socheong2, particularly at 12 HAI compared to 0 HAI. This study will aid in targeted breeding efforts to develop soybean varieties with improved resistance to P. sojae.</p>","PeriodicalId":20173,"journal":{"name":"Plant Pathology Journal","volume":"40 6","pages":"641-655"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626037/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Pathology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.09.2024.0154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phytophthora root and stem rot, caused by Phytophthora sojae, considerably reduces soybean yield worldwide. Our previous study identified two genomic regions on chromosome 18 (2.1-2.6 and 53.1-53.3 Mbp) that confer resistance to the P. sojae isolate 2457, through linkage analysis using progenies derived from the Daepung × Socheong2 population. These two regions contained 51 and 19 annotated genes, respectively. However, the specific gene responsible for resistance to P. sojae isolate 2457 has yet to be identified. In this study, we performed a comparative transcriptomic analysis of Socheong2 and Daepung, two Korean soybean varieties identified as resistant and susceptible to P. sojae isolate 2457, respectively. RNA sequencing was conducted on tissue samples collected at 0, 6, and 12 hours after inoculation (HAI), and significant differences in the expression of defense-related genes were observed across time points and between the two cultivars. Genes associated with the jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, ethylene, and systemic acquired resistance pathways were upregulated in both cultivars at 6 and 12 HAI compared to 0 HAI, with these biological processes were more strongly upregulated in Socheong2 compared to Daepung at 6 and 12 HAI. A comparison of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and candidate genes within the previously identified QTL regions revealed an ortholog of the HS1 PRO-1 2 gene from Arabidopsis thaliana among the upregulated DEGs in Socheong2, particularly at 12 HAI compared to 0 HAI. This study will aid in targeted breeding efforts to develop soybean varieties with improved resistance to P. sojae.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗感大豆品种对接种大豆疫霉的转录组比较
大豆疫霉引起的根茎腐病,在世界范围内严重降低大豆产量。我们之前的研究通过对来自Daepung × Socheong2群体的后代进行连锁分析,发现18号染色体上的两个基因组区域(2.1-2.6和53.1-53.3 Mbp)赋予了对大豆大豆分离物2457的抗性。这两个区域分别包含51个和19个注释基因。然而,对大豆大豆杆菌2457株产生抗性的特定基因尚未确定。在这项研究中,我们对鉴定为抗和敏感的两个韩国大豆品种Socheong2和Daepung进行了比较转录组学分析。对接种后0、6和12小时采集的组织样本进行RNA测序,观察到不同时间点和两个品种之间防御相关基因的表达存在显著差异。在6和12 HAI下,与0 HAI相比,两个品种的茉莉酸、水杨酸、乙烯和系统获得性抗性途径相关的基因在6和12 HAI下都有所上调,其中Socheong2比大平在6和12 HAI下的这些生物过程上调得更强烈。对先前鉴定的QTL区域内差异表达基因(DEGs)和候选基因的比较显示,在Socheong2中上调的DEGs中,来自拟南芥的HS1 pro - 12基因同源,特别是在12 HAI与0 HAI之间。本研究将有助于有针对性地培育抗大豆疫病的大豆品种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Pathology Journal
Plant Pathology Journal 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Functional Analysis of KPvRxLR27, a Novel Plasmopara viticola Effector from a Korean Isolate, and Its Role in Hypersensitive Response. Characterization and Biocontrol Efficacy of Bacillus velezensis GYUN-1190 against Apple Bitter Rot. A Novel and Advanced Diagnostic Approach toward Paracidovorax citrulli Causing Bacterial Fruit Blotch in Watermelon by Direct SYBR Green Real-Time PCR Assay. Characterization of Tomato Seed Endophytic Bacteria as Growth Promoters and Potential Biocontrol Agents. Construction and Characterization of a Full-Length Infectious cDNA Clone of a Strain of Watermelon Mosaic Virus Isolated from Melon.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1