Mette Dokken RN, MNSc , Tone Rustøen RN, PhD , Thordis Thomsen RN, PhD , Gunnar K. Bentsen MD, PhD , Ingrid Egerod RN, PhD
{"title":"Nurses' and physicians’ experience of a new algorithm for tapering analgosedation in the paediatric intensive care unit: A focus-group investigation","authors":"Mette Dokken RN, MNSc , Tone Rustøen RN, PhD , Thordis Thomsen RN, PhD , Gunnar K. Bentsen MD, PhD , Ingrid Egerod RN, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim/objective</h3><div>Iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome occurs frequently during the tapering phase of opioids and benzodiazepines in paediatric intensive care units. The aim of this study was to explore physicians' and nurses' experiences in patient care and staff collaboration during the tapering phase using a new “algorithm for tapering analgosedation”</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used a qualitative explorative design with focus groups. The framework method was followed including transcription, familiarisation, coding, developing a framework, applying the framework, charting data into the framework matrix, and interpreting the data. The study was conducted at two paediatric intensive care units at Oslo University Hospital in Norway. Nurses and physicians who had used the new algorithm participated in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Three focus-group interviews were conducted with a total of 15 informants. Three main themes were identified with relevant subthemes: “Caring for a child in withdrawal”, “Advantages of the algorithm”, and “Challenges of the algorithm”. The algorithm positively affected patient care and staff collaboration during tapering. The use of the Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 integrated in the algorithm required experienced nurses due to the risk of false-positive patient assessments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Nurses and physicians in our study experienced that the new algorithm promoted staff collaboration and positively affected patient care. The use of the Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 integrated in the algorithm required experienced staff and resources for continuous staff education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 2","pages":"Article 101141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1036731424002923","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim/objective
Iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome occurs frequently during the tapering phase of opioids and benzodiazepines in paediatric intensive care units. The aim of this study was to explore physicians' and nurses' experiences in patient care and staff collaboration during the tapering phase using a new “algorithm for tapering analgosedation”
Methods
We used a qualitative explorative design with focus groups. The framework method was followed including transcription, familiarisation, coding, developing a framework, applying the framework, charting data into the framework matrix, and interpreting the data. The study was conducted at two paediatric intensive care units at Oslo University Hospital in Norway. Nurses and physicians who had used the new algorithm participated in the study.
Findings
Three focus-group interviews were conducted with a total of 15 informants. Three main themes were identified with relevant subthemes: “Caring for a child in withdrawal”, “Advantages of the algorithm”, and “Challenges of the algorithm”. The algorithm positively affected patient care and staff collaboration during tapering. The use of the Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 integrated in the algorithm required experienced nurses due to the risk of false-positive patient assessments.
Conclusion
Nurses and physicians in our study experienced that the new algorithm promoted staff collaboration and positively affected patient care. The use of the Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 integrated in the algorithm required experienced staff and resources for continuous staff education.
期刊介绍:
Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.