Linjie Bian, Junyan Xu, Panli Li, Liyan Bai, Shaoli Song
{"title":"Comparison of <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC and <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT for Detection of Recurrent or Metastatic Paragangliomas.","authors":"Linjie Bian, Junyan Xu, Panli Li, Liyan Bai, Shaoli Song","doi":"10.1148/rycan.240059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of gallium 68 (<sup>68</sup>Ga)-DOTA-NaI3-octreotide (<sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC) and fluorine 18 (<sup>18</sup>F)-fluoro-l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (<sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA) PET/CT in detecting recurrent or metastatic paragangliomas. Materials and Methods This single-center retrospective study included patients with paragangliomas who underwent both <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT between August 2021 and December 2023. The diagnostic performance of these two tracers in detecting recurrent or metastatic tumors was compared using several metrics, including sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy. Results This study included 36 patients (median age, 52 years [range, 14-78 years]; 16 female, 20 male). Of these, nine underwent initial <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC and <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT examinations before treatment, and the remaining 27 underwent posttreatment examinations. Twenty-two of those 27 patients had recurrence or metastasis. According to lesion-level analysis, <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC had higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for diagnosis of bone metastases than did <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT (97% vs 78% [<i>P</i> < .001], 85% vs 42% [<i>P</i> = .02], and 97% vs 81% [<i>P</i> < .001], respectively). <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT had higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for the diagnosis of liver metastases than did <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (73% vs 15% [<i>P</i> < .001], 68% vs 41% [<i>P</i> = .04], and 83% vs 46% [<i>P</i> < .001], respectively). According to patient-level analysis, the sensitivity of <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT for diagnosing liver metastases was higher than that of <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (88% vs 25%; <i>P</i> = .04). Conclusion In patients with recurrent or metastatic paragangliomas, <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT showed better performance than <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT in detecting bone metastases, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT performed better in detecting liver metastases. <b>Keywords:</b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC, <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA, Pheochromocytoma, Paraganglioma Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.</p>","PeriodicalId":20786,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","volume":"7 1","pages":"e240059"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.240059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of gallium 68 (68Ga)-DOTA-NaI3-octreotide (68Ga-DOTANOC) and fluorine 18 (18F)-fluoro-l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-FDOPA) PET/CT in detecting recurrent or metastatic paragangliomas. Materials and Methods This single-center retrospective study included patients with paragangliomas who underwent both 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT and 18F-FDOPA PET/CT between August 2021 and December 2023. The diagnostic performance of these two tracers in detecting recurrent or metastatic tumors was compared using several metrics, including sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy. Results This study included 36 patients (median age, 52 years [range, 14-78 years]; 16 female, 20 male). Of these, nine underwent initial 68Ga-DOTANOC and 18F-FDOPA PET/CT examinations before treatment, and the remaining 27 underwent posttreatment examinations. Twenty-two of those 27 patients had recurrence or metastasis. According to lesion-level analysis, 68Ga-DOTANOC had higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for diagnosis of bone metastases than did 18F-FDOPA PET/CT (97% vs 78% [P < .001], 85% vs 42% [P = .02], and 97% vs 81% [P < .001], respectively). 18F-FDOPA PET/CT had higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for the diagnosis of liver metastases than did 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (73% vs 15% [P < .001], 68% vs 41% [P = .04], and 83% vs 46% [P < .001], respectively). According to patient-level analysis, the sensitivity of 18F-FDOPA PET/CT for diagnosing liver metastases was higher than that of 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (88% vs 25%; P = .04). Conclusion In patients with recurrent or metastatic paragangliomas, 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT showed better performance than 18F-FDOPA PET/CT in detecting bone metastases, and 18F-FDOPA PET/CT performed better in detecting liver metastases. Keywords:68Ga-DOTANOC, 18F-FDOPA, Pheochromocytoma, Paraganglioma Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.