Comparison of 68Ga-DOTANOC and 18F-FDOPA PET/CT for Detection of Recurrent or Metastatic Paragangliomas.

IF 5.6 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiology. Imaging cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1148/rycan.240059
Linjie Bian, Junyan Xu, Panli Li, Liyan Bai, Shaoli Song
{"title":"Comparison of <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC and <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT for Detection of Recurrent or Metastatic Paragangliomas.","authors":"Linjie Bian, Junyan Xu, Panli Li, Liyan Bai, Shaoli Song","doi":"10.1148/rycan.240059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of gallium 68 (<sup>68</sup>Ga)-DOTA-NaI3-octreotide (<sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC) and fluorine 18 (<sup>18</sup>F)-fluoro-l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (<sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA) PET/CT in detecting recurrent or metastatic paragangliomas. Materials and Methods This single-center retrospective study included patients with paragangliomas who underwent both <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT between August 2021 and December 2023. The diagnostic performance of these two tracers in detecting recurrent or metastatic tumors was compared using several metrics, including sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy. Results This study included 36 patients (median age, 52 years [range, 14-78 years]; 16 female, 20 male). Of these, nine underwent initial <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC and <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT examinations before treatment, and the remaining 27 underwent posttreatment examinations. Twenty-two of those 27 patients had recurrence or metastasis. According to lesion-level analysis, <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC had higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for diagnosis of bone metastases than did <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT (97% vs 78% [<i>P</i> < .001], 85% vs 42% [<i>P</i> = .02], and 97% vs 81% [<i>P</i> < .001], respectively). <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT had higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for the diagnosis of liver metastases than did <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (73% vs 15% [<i>P</i> < .001], 68% vs 41% [<i>P</i> = .04], and 83% vs 46% [<i>P</i> < .001], respectively). According to patient-level analysis, the sensitivity of <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT for diagnosing liver metastases was higher than that of <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (88% vs 25%; <i>P</i> = .04). Conclusion In patients with recurrent or metastatic paragangliomas, <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT showed better performance than <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT in detecting bone metastases, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA PET/CT performed better in detecting liver metastases. <b>Keywords:</b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC, <sup>18</sup>F-FDOPA, Pheochromocytoma, Paraganglioma Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.</p>","PeriodicalId":20786,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","volume":"7 1","pages":"e240059"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.240059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of gallium 68 (68Ga)-DOTA-NaI3-octreotide (68Ga-DOTANOC) and fluorine 18 (18F)-fluoro-l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-FDOPA) PET/CT in detecting recurrent or metastatic paragangliomas. Materials and Methods This single-center retrospective study included patients with paragangliomas who underwent both 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT and 18F-FDOPA PET/CT between August 2021 and December 2023. The diagnostic performance of these two tracers in detecting recurrent or metastatic tumors was compared using several metrics, including sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy. Results This study included 36 patients (median age, 52 years [range, 14-78 years]; 16 female, 20 male). Of these, nine underwent initial 68Ga-DOTANOC and 18F-FDOPA PET/CT examinations before treatment, and the remaining 27 underwent posttreatment examinations. Twenty-two of those 27 patients had recurrence or metastasis. According to lesion-level analysis, 68Ga-DOTANOC had higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for diagnosis of bone metastases than did 18F-FDOPA PET/CT (97% vs 78% [P < .001], 85% vs 42% [P = .02], and 97% vs 81% [P < .001], respectively). 18F-FDOPA PET/CT had higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for the diagnosis of liver metastases than did 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (73% vs 15% [P < .001], 68% vs 41% [P = .04], and 83% vs 46% [P < .001], respectively). According to patient-level analysis, the sensitivity of 18F-FDOPA PET/CT for diagnosing liver metastases was higher than that of 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (88% vs 25%; P = .04). Conclusion In patients with recurrent or metastatic paragangliomas, 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT showed better performance than 18F-FDOPA PET/CT in detecting bone metastases, and 18F-FDOPA PET/CT performed better in detecting liver metastases. Keywords: 68Ga-DOTANOC, 18F-FDOPA, Pheochromocytoma, Paraganglioma Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of 68Ga-DOTANOC and 18F-FDOPA PET/CT for Detection of Recurrent or Metastatic Paragangliomas. Radiologically Negative Colorectal Diaphragmatic Metastasis Mimicking Liver Lesion. 18F-FLT PET and Blood-based Biomarkers for Identifying Gastrointestinal Graft versus Host Disease after Allogeneic Cell Transplantation. Gastric Cancer Metastasis Mimicking Thyroiditis. Association of Clinical and US Features with Malignancy of Breast Tumors: Investigating Shear-Wave Elastography and Radiomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1