Decolonizing climate change response: African indigenous knowledge and sustainable development.

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2024-11-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1456871
James Ojochenemi David
{"title":"Decolonizing climate change response: African indigenous knowledge and sustainable development.","authors":"James Ojochenemi David","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1456871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) poses a critical challenge necessitating effective global climate change mitigation efforts. However, the pervasive influence of scientism in AGW discourse often marginalizes Indigenous perspectives crucial for addressing climate impacts, particularly in Africa where adaptive capacity is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study, rooted in Transformative Learning Theory and Ubuntu philosophy, employs critical qualitative research methods to examine how scientism shapes AGW discourse epistemologically and ethically. It explores the hindrances posed by climate change denialism and ecomodernism due to scientism while advocating the integration of African Indigenous Knowledge Systems (AIKs) into climate response strategies, particularly within the African education landscape.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Drawing on the theoretical frameworks of Transformative Learning and Ubuntu philosophy, and informed by critical qualitative research methodology, this research analyzes the role of scientism in AGW discourse. It investigates its implications for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and discusses arguments for the inclusion of AIK in educational and policy frameworks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study reveals that scientism perpetuates epistemological biases that undervalue AIK, thereby impeding comprehensive climate response strategies. Pathways are proposed that promote AIK integration and mainstreaming, thereby decolonizing climate response efforts and enhancing ESD within Africa's educational institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating insights from AIK, construed in terms of 'exemplary ethical communities' (EEC), into climate change responses is pivotal for fostering inclusive and effective strategies. This approach not only addresses the ethical imperatives of decolonization but also enhances resilience and sustainability in climate-vulnerable regions.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This study contributes to scholarship by highlighting the urgent need to diversify climate response strategies through the inclusion of AIK. By advocating for the integration of wisdom from EECs, it advances discussions on decoloniality within climate change discourse, emphasizing the importance of Indigenous knowledge in global sustainability efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"9 ","pages":"1456871"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1456871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) poses a critical challenge necessitating effective global climate change mitigation efforts. However, the pervasive influence of scientism in AGW discourse often marginalizes Indigenous perspectives crucial for addressing climate impacts, particularly in Africa where adaptive capacity is limited.

Objective: This study, rooted in Transformative Learning Theory and Ubuntu philosophy, employs critical qualitative research methods to examine how scientism shapes AGW discourse epistemologically and ethically. It explores the hindrances posed by climate change denialism and ecomodernism due to scientism while advocating the integration of African Indigenous Knowledge Systems (AIKs) into climate response strategies, particularly within the African education landscape.

Methods: Drawing on the theoretical frameworks of Transformative Learning and Ubuntu philosophy, and informed by critical qualitative research methodology, this research analyzes the role of scientism in AGW discourse. It investigates its implications for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and discusses arguments for the inclusion of AIK in educational and policy frameworks.

Results: The study reveals that scientism perpetuates epistemological biases that undervalue AIK, thereby impeding comprehensive climate response strategies. Pathways are proposed that promote AIK integration and mainstreaming, thereby decolonizing climate response efforts and enhancing ESD within Africa's educational institutions.

Conclusion: Integrating insights from AIK, construed in terms of 'exemplary ethical communities' (EEC), into climate change responses is pivotal for fostering inclusive and effective strategies. This approach not only addresses the ethical imperatives of decolonization but also enhances resilience and sustainability in climate-vulnerable regions.

Significance: This study contributes to scholarship by highlighting the urgent need to diversify climate response strategies through the inclusion of AIK. By advocating for the integration of wisdom from EECs, it advances discussions on decoloniality within climate change discourse, emphasizing the importance of Indigenous knowledge in global sustainability efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非殖民化气候变化应对:非洲土著知识与可持续发展。
背景:人为全球变暖(AGW)是一个严峻的挑战,需要有效的全球气候变化减缓努力。然而,科学主义在AGW话语中的普遍影响往往使土著观点边缘化,土著观点对应对气候影响至关重要,特别是在适应能力有限的非洲。目的:本研究以变革学习理论和乌班图哲学为基础,采用批判性质的研究方法,从认识论和伦理上考察科学主义如何塑造AGW话语。它探讨了由于科学主义而造成的气候变化否认主义和生态现代主义所造成的障碍,同时提倡将非洲土著知识系统(AIKs)整合到气候应对战略中,特别是在非洲教育领域。方法:借鉴变革学习和乌班图哲学的理论框架,采用批判性质的研究方法,分析科学主义在AGW话语中的作用。它调查了其对可持续发展教育(ESD)的影响,并讨论了将AIK纳入教育和政策框架的论点。结果:研究表明,科学主义延续了低估AIK的认识论偏见,从而阻碍了全面的气候应对策略。提出了促进AIK一体化和主流化的途径,从而使气候应对工作非殖民化,并加强非洲教育机构内的可持续发展教育。结论:将AIK的见解(以“模范道德社区”(EEC)的方式解释)整合到气候变化响应中,对于促进包容性和有效的战略至关重要。这种方法不仅解决了非殖民化的道德要求,而且还增强了气候脆弱地区的复原力和可持续性。意义:本研究强调了通过纳入AIK实现气候应对策略多样化的迫切需要,为学术研究做出了贡献。通过倡导整合来自欧共体的智慧,它推动了气候变化话语中关于非殖民化的讨论,强调了土著知识在全球可持续性努力中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cognitive dissonance as a reason for low perceived HIV risk among Black women. Indigenous Maya-Mam leadership competencies: a grounded theory study. Scientific mapping of the nexus between entrepreneurial orientation and environmental sustainability: bibliometric analysis. Contesting crisis narratives amidst climatic breakdown: Climate change, mobility, and state-centric approaches to migration. From speech acts to communicative acts: social network debates about sexual consent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1