Comparing NIRA and Traditional Network Approaches: A Study Case With Antisocial Personality Disorder Traits.

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1111/jopy.13005
Gisele Magarotto Machado, Knut Erik Skjeldal, Cato Grønnerød, Lucas de Francisco de Carvalho
{"title":"Comparing NIRA and Traditional Network Approaches: A Study Case With Antisocial Personality Disorder Traits.","authors":"Gisele Magarotto Machado, Knut Erik Skjeldal, Cato Grønnerød, Lucas de Francisco de Carvalho","doi":"10.1111/jopy.13005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explores the NodeIdentifyR algorithm (NIRA) as a novel network analysis method for examining Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD) traits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a sample of 2230 Brazilian adults (aged 18-73 years) who responded to ASPD-related factors of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), we applied NIRA to an ASPD network and compared its results with traditional network analysis methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings revealed that deceitfulness emerged as the most central trait across both methodologies. NIRA provided additional insights, indicating that simulated decreases in the likelihood of irresponsibility reduced the presence of other traits, while a simulated increase in deceitfulness amplified the likelihood of other ASPD pathological traits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that traditional network centrality measures converge with NIRA's simulated increase results, but NIRA's simulated decrease provides additional information not captured by traditional centrality estimates. We recommend further research to validate these findings across different psychopathologies and refine NIRA use in clinical settings. The insights from this study could serve as a foundation for developing targeted interventions and enhancing our understanding of ASPD trait dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.13005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study explores the NodeIdentifyR algorithm (NIRA) as a novel network analysis method for examining Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD) traits.

Methods: Using a sample of 2230 Brazilian adults (aged 18-73 years) who responded to ASPD-related factors of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), we applied NIRA to an ASPD network and compared its results with traditional network analysis methods.

Results: Our findings revealed that deceitfulness emerged as the most central trait across both methodologies. NIRA provided additional insights, indicating that simulated decreases in the likelihood of irresponsibility reduced the presence of other traits, while a simulated increase in deceitfulness amplified the likelihood of other ASPD pathological traits.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that traditional network centrality measures converge with NIRA's simulated increase results, but NIRA's simulated decrease provides additional information not captured by traditional centrality estimates. We recommend further research to validate these findings across different psychopathologies and refine NIRA use in clinical settings. The insights from this study could serve as a foundation for developing targeted interventions and enhancing our understanding of ASPD trait dynamics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NIRA与传统网络方法的比较:一个反社会人格障碍特征的研究案例。
目的:探讨NodeIdentifyR算法(NIRA)作为一种新的网络分析方法来检测反社会人格障碍(ASPD)的特征。方法:选取对DSM-5 (pid5)人格量表中ASPD相关因素有反应的2230名巴西成年人(18-73岁)为样本,将NIRA应用于一个ASPD网络,并将其结果与传统网络分析方法进行比较。结果:我们的研究结果表明,欺骗是两种方法中最核心的特征。NIRA提供了额外的见解,表明模拟的不负责任可能性的减少减少了其他特征的存在,而模拟的欺骗增加了其他反社会障碍病理特征的可能性。结论:我们的研究结果表明,传统的网络中心性度量与NIRA模拟的增加结果收敛,但NIRA模拟的减少提供了传统中心性估计无法捕获的额外信息。我们建议进一步研究以验证不同精神病理学的这些发现,并完善NIRA在临床环境中的应用。本研究的见解可以作为制定有针对性的干预措施和增强我们对反社会人格障碍特征动态的理解的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
期刊最新文献
Investigating solitude as a tool for downregulation of daily arousal using ecological momentary assessments. Embodied Cognition and the Structure of Personality: An Exploratory Study of Longitudinal Pathways From Early Psychomotor Function Does a Small Country Have Meaningful Regional Personality Differences? The Case of Estonia Empathy During Crises: Investigating Attitudes, Tolerance, and Ingroup–Outgroup Dynamics in Response to Refugee Movements Does Perfectionism Affect Parental Identity Development? A One‐Year Longitudinal Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1