Applied Political Analysis for Health System Reform.

Health systems and reform Pub Date : 2024-12-18 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1080/23288604.2024.2430284
Michael R Reich, Paola Abril Campos Rivera
{"title":"Applied Political Analysis for Health System Reform.","authors":"Michael R Reich, Paola Abril Campos Rivera","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2024.2430284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding and managing the political context of health policies is crucial to improving the chances of effectively designing, adopting, and implementing health policies and reforms that can achieve their intended objectives. This article focuses on applied political analysis as an approach to assist policymakers and public health professionals in improving political feasibility for policies and reforms. The article draws on our experience in doing applied political analysis and in advising and teaching others how to do applied political analysis. We describe the role of applied political analysis at six stages of the policy cycle (problem definition, diagnosis, policy development, political decision, implementation, and evaluation). We then present four steps for doing applied political analysis, using a concrete example at each step: 1) agree on the objectives and methods of analysis, 2) conduct a stakeholder analysis, 3) design a set of political strategies, and 4) assess the impact of the strategies on policitcal feasibility of the desired change. Political landscapes can change suddenly in unexpected ways. Doing applied political analysis, however, can increase the likelihood that the proposed policy changes will be adopted and achieve the desired outcomes in implementation. Repeating the analysis over time as the policy process unfolds and keeping track of stakeholders and strategies can increase the chances that health reform teams successfully manage the politics of policy change.</p>","PeriodicalId":73218,"journal":{"name":"Health systems and reform","volume":"10 3","pages":"2430284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems and reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2024.2430284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding and managing the political context of health policies is crucial to improving the chances of effectively designing, adopting, and implementing health policies and reforms that can achieve their intended objectives. This article focuses on applied political analysis as an approach to assist policymakers and public health professionals in improving political feasibility for policies and reforms. The article draws on our experience in doing applied political analysis and in advising and teaching others how to do applied political analysis. We describe the role of applied political analysis at six stages of the policy cycle (problem definition, diagnosis, policy development, political decision, implementation, and evaluation). We then present four steps for doing applied political analysis, using a concrete example at each step: 1) agree on the objectives and methods of analysis, 2) conduct a stakeholder analysis, 3) design a set of political strategies, and 4) assess the impact of the strategies on policitcal feasibility of the desired change. Political landscapes can change suddenly in unexpected ways. Doing applied political analysis, however, can increase the likelihood that the proposed policy changes will be adopted and achieve the desired outcomes in implementation. Repeating the analysis over time as the policy process unfolds and keeping track of stakeholders and strategies can increase the chances that health reform teams successfully manage the politics of policy change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Public Financial Management Save Life? Evidence from a Quantitative Review of PFM and Health Outcomes in Sub-Saharan African Countries. COVID-19 Deaths in Long-Term Care Facilities in the US: An Urgent Call for Equitable and Integrated Health Systems and an All-Hazards Approach to the Next Crisis. Resilience of Primary Health Care in Ukraine: Challenges of the Pandemic and War. The Impact of Centralized Procurement on Treatment Patterns for Myocardial Infarction and More Principled Utilization of Coronary Stents. Data Integration of Health Financing Systems as a Critical Enabler for Objective-Oriented Health System Reform: A Scoping Review from India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1