Can all roads lead to competency? School levels effects in Licensing examinations scores.

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Advances in Health Sciences Education Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1007/s10459-024-10398-0
Kulamakan Kulasegaram, Douglas Archibald, Ilona Bartman, Saad Chahine, Amrit Kirpalani, Claire Wilson, Brian Ross, Erin Cameron, John Hogenbirk, Cassandra Barber, Raquel Burgess, Eleni Katsoulas, Claire Touchie, Lawrence Grierson
{"title":"Can all roads lead to competency? School levels effects in Licensing examinations scores.","authors":"Kulamakan Kulasegaram, Douglas Archibald, Ilona Bartman, Saad Chahine, Amrit Kirpalani, Claire Wilson, Brian Ross, Erin Cameron, John Hogenbirk, Cassandra Barber, Raquel Burgess, Eleni Katsoulas, Claire Touchie, Lawrence Grierson","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10398-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At the foundation of research concerned with professional training is the idea of an assumed causal chain between the policies and practices of education and the eventual behaviours of those that graduate these programs. In medicine, given the social accountability to ensure that teaching and learning gives way to a health human resource that is willing and able to provide the healthcare that patients and communities need, it is of critical importance to generate evidence regarding this causal relationship. One question that medical education scholars ask regularly is the degree to which the unique features of training programs and learning environments impact trainee achievement of the intended learning outcomes. To date, this evidence has been difficult to generate because data pertaining to learners is only rarely systematically brought together across institutions or periods of training. We describe new research which leverages an inter-institutional data-driven approach to investigate the influence of school-level factors on the licensing outcomes of medical students. Specifically, we bring together sociodemographic, admissions, and in-training assessment variables pertaining to medical trainee graduates at each of the six medical schools in Ontario, Canada into multilevel stepwise regression models that determine the degree of association between these variables and graduate performances on the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examinations (Part 1, n = 1097 observations; Part 2, n = 616 observations), established predictors of downstream physician performance. As part of this analysis, we include an anonymized school-level (School 1, School 2) independent variable in each of these models. Our results demonstrate that the largest variable associated with performance on both the first and second parts of the licensing examinations is prior academic achievement, notably clerkship performance. Ratings of biomedical knowledge were also significantly associated with the first examination, while clerkship OSCE scores and enrollment in a family medicine residency were significantly associated with the Part 2. Small significant school effects were realized in both models accounting for 4% and 2% of the variance realized in the first and second examinations, respectively. These findings highlight that school enrollment plays a minor role relative to individual student performance in influencing examination outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10398-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the foundation of research concerned with professional training is the idea of an assumed causal chain between the policies and practices of education and the eventual behaviours of those that graduate these programs. In medicine, given the social accountability to ensure that teaching and learning gives way to a health human resource that is willing and able to provide the healthcare that patients and communities need, it is of critical importance to generate evidence regarding this causal relationship. One question that medical education scholars ask regularly is the degree to which the unique features of training programs and learning environments impact trainee achievement of the intended learning outcomes. To date, this evidence has been difficult to generate because data pertaining to learners is only rarely systematically brought together across institutions or periods of training. We describe new research which leverages an inter-institutional data-driven approach to investigate the influence of school-level factors on the licensing outcomes of medical students. Specifically, we bring together sociodemographic, admissions, and in-training assessment variables pertaining to medical trainee graduates at each of the six medical schools in Ontario, Canada into multilevel stepwise regression models that determine the degree of association between these variables and graduate performances on the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examinations (Part 1, n = 1097 observations; Part 2, n = 616 observations), established predictors of downstream physician performance. As part of this analysis, we include an anonymized school-level (School 1, School 2) independent variable in each of these models. Our results demonstrate that the largest variable associated with performance on both the first and second parts of the licensing examinations is prior academic achievement, notably clerkship performance. Ratings of biomedical knowledge were also significantly associated with the first examination, while clerkship OSCE scores and enrollment in a family medicine residency were significantly associated with the Part 2. Small significant school effects were realized in both models accounting for 4% and 2% of the variance realized in the first and second examinations, respectively. These findings highlight that school enrollment plays a minor role relative to individual student performance in influencing examination outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
所有的道路都能通向能力吗?学校水平对执照考试成绩的影响。
有关专业培训的研究的基础是,在教育政策和实践与这些课程的毕业生的最终行为之间存在假定的因果链。在医学领域,鉴于确保教学和学习让位于愿意并能够提供患者和社区所需医疗保健的卫生人力资源的社会责任,就这种因果关系提出证据至关重要。医学教育学者经常提出的一个问题是,培训项目和学习环境的独特特征在多大程度上影响了实习生的预期学习成果。迄今为止,这种证据很难产生,因为与学习者有关的数据很少系统地跨机构或培训期间汇集在一起。我们描述了一项新的研究,利用机构间数据驱动的方法来调查学校层面因素对医学生许可结果的影响。具体而言,我们将加拿大安大略省六所医学院的医学实习毕业生的社会人口学、入学和在职评估变量纳入多水平逐步回归模型,以确定这些变量与毕业生在加拿大医学委员会资格考试中的表现之间的关联程度(第1部分,n = 1097观察结果;第2部分,n = 616个观察值),建立了下游医师表现的预测因子。作为分析的一部分,我们在每个模型中都包含了一个匿名的学校级别(学校1,学校2)自变量。我们的研究结果表明,与执照考试第一部分和第二部分的表现相关的最大变量是先前的学术成就,特别是职员表现。生物医学知识的评分也与第一次考试显著相关,而欧安组织办案成绩和家庭医学住院医师的注册与第二部分显著相关。两个模型都实现了小的显著学校效应,分别占第一次和第二次考试实现方差的4%和2%。这些发现强调,相对于个别学生的表现,入学对考试结果的影响较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
期刊最新文献
Is 'data science' science? The liminal space of metacognitive reflection: the art of contradistinction (a response to define or not define). Career coaching to support medical student career decision-making: a randomized controlled trial. Correction to: Can all roads lead to competency? School levels effects in licensing examinations scores. On concepts, constructs, measures, metrics, and the variable necessity of definitions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1