Irl B Hirsch, Roy W Beck, Martin C Marak, Yogish Kudva, Halis K Akturk, Anuj Bhargava, Kevin Codorniz, Jamie Diner, Grazia Aleppo, Thomas Blevins, Carol J Levy, Philip Raskin, Kristin Castorino, Anastasios Manessis, David Pickering, Devin W Steenkamp, Ruth S Weinstock, Bruce W Bode, Osama Hamdy, Quang T Nguyen, Mark Kipnes, Katrina J Ruedy, Donna Desjardins, Zehra Haider, Christopher Jacobson, Scott Lee, John B Buse, Klara Rachel Klein, Grenye O'Malley, Mei Mei Church, Adham Mottalib, Jesica D Baran, Corey Kurek, Shafaq Rizvi, Cassandra Donahue, Denisa Tamarez, Astrid Atakov Castillo, Sarah Borgman, Sarah Frey, Peter Calhoun
{"title":"A Randomized Trial Comparing Inhaled Insulin Plus Basal Insulin Versus Usual Care in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.","authors":"Irl B Hirsch, Roy W Beck, Martin C Marak, Yogish Kudva, Halis K Akturk, Anuj Bhargava, Kevin Codorniz, Jamie Diner, Grazia Aleppo, Thomas Blevins, Carol J Levy, Philip Raskin, Kristin Castorino, Anastasios Manessis, David Pickering, Devin W Steenkamp, Ruth S Weinstock, Bruce W Bode, Osama Hamdy, Quang T Nguyen, Mark Kipnes, Katrina J Ruedy, Donna Desjardins, Zehra Haider, Christopher Jacobson, Scott Lee, John B Buse, Klara Rachel Klein, Grenye O'Malley, Mei Mei Church, Adham Mottalib, Jesica D Baran, Corey Kurek, Shafaq Rizvi, Cassandra Donahue, Denisa Tamarez, Astrid Atakov Castillo, Sarah Borgman, Sarah Frey, Peter Calhoun","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate a regimen of inhaled Technosphere insulin (TI) plus insulin degludec in adults with type 1 diabetes, who prestudy were predominately using either an automated insulin delivery (AID) system or multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) with continuous glucose monitoring.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>At 19 sites, adults with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned to TI plus insulin degludec (N = 62) or usual care (UC) with continuation of prestudy insulin delivery method (N = 61) for 17 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prestudy, AID was used by 48% and MDI by 45%. Mean ± SD HbA1c was 7.57% ± 0.97% at baseline and 7.62% ± 1.06% at 17 weeks in the TI group and 7.59% ± 0.80% and 7.54% ± 0.77%, respectively, in the UC group (adjusted difference 0.11%, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.33, P value for noninferiority = 0.01). HbA1c improved from baseline to 17 weeks by >0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) in 12 (21%) in the TI group and in 3 (5%) in the UC group and worsened by >0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) in 15 (26%) in the TI group and in 2 (3%) in the UC group. The most common TI side effect was a brief cough; eight participants discontinued TI due to side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adults with type 1 diabetes, HbA1c after 17 weeks with a regimen of TI and degludec was noninferior to UC, which consisted predominately of either AID or MDI. TI should be considered an option for people with type 1 diabetes, particularly those who are motivated to further reduce postprandial hyperglycemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate a regimen of inhaled Technosphere insulin (TI) plus insulin degludec in adults with type 1 diabetes, who prestudy were predominately using either an automated insulin delivery (AID) system or multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) with continuous glucose monitoring.
Research design and methods: At 19 sites, adults with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned to TI plus insulin degludec (N = 62) or usual care (UC) with continuation of prestudy insulin delivery method (N = 61) for 17 weeks.
Results: Prestudy, AID was used by 48% and MDI by 45%. Mean ± SD HbA1c was 7.57% ± 0.97% at baseline and 7.62% ± 1.06% at 17 weeks in the TI group and 7.59% ± 0.80% and 7.54% ± 0.77%, respectively, in the UC group (adjusted difference 0.11%, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.33, P value for noninferiority = 0.01). HbA1c improved from baseline to 17 weeks by >0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) in 12 (21%) in the TI group and in 3 (5%) in the UC group and worsened by >0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) in 15 (26%) in the TI group and in 2 (3%) in the UC group. The most common TI side effect was a brief cough; eight participants discontinued TI due to side effects.
Conclusions: In adults with type 1 diabetes, HbA1c after 17 weeks with a regimen of TI and degludec was noninferior to UC, which consisted predominately of either AID or MDI. TI should be considered an option for people with type 1 diabetes, particularly those who are motivated to further reduce postprandial hyperglycemia.