Lilibeth A. Zambrano M , Nele Famaey , Michael Gilchrist , Aislin Ní Annaidh
{"title":"Fracture mechanics properties of human cranial bone","authors":"Lilibeth A. Zambrano M , Nele Famaey , Michael Gilchrist , Aislin Ní Annaidh","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The mechanical properties of the human skull have been examined and established previously in the literature, for example, the transversal isotropy of cranial bone and properties including the Elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio. However, despite the existing data, there are still mechanical properties which remain to be determined for the human skull. The present study aims to characterise the fracture properties of human cranial bone within the Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) framework. Unembalmed human (2 female and 3 male) cortical cranial bone samples were harvested from the frontal, and left and right parietal bones and were tested in Mode I (N = 124), Mode II (N = 31) and Mixed-Mode I-II (N = 47) loading conditions. For Mode I, samples were tested using Single Edge Notched Beams (SENB) under symmetric 3-point bending, while for Mixed-Mode I-II samples were tested under asymmetric 3-point bending. For Mode II, 4-point bend tests were carried out. All samples fractured in a brittle fashion. From these tests, reference values of stress intensity factor (<em>K</em><sub><em>I</em></sub> and <em>K</em><sub><em>II</em></sub>) and the strain energy release rate (<em>J</em><sub><em>I</em></sub><em>, G</em><sub><em>I</em></sub><em>, G</em><sub><em>II</em></sub><em>, G</em><sub><em>I-II</em></sub>) for the frontal, left and right parietal bones were calculated. It was determined that the fracture toughness of the frontal, and left and right parietal bones are not statistically different from each other and that they exhibit symmetry about the sagittal plane. It was also demonstrated that, as is the case for other human bones and for the age range tested here, the fracture toughness of human cranial bone is lower for females (<em>K</em><sub><em>I</em></sub> <em>female</em> 2.48 (±2.16) MPa∗m<sup>0.5</sup>, <em>K</em><sub><em>I</em></sub> <em>male</em> 4.75 (±2.58) MPa∗m<sup>0.5</sup>, <em>G</em><sub><em>I</em></sub> <em>female</em> 1.07 (±3.01) kJ/m<sup>2</sup>, <em>G</em><sub><em>I</em></sub> <em>male</em> 1.85 (±1.93) kJ/m<sup>2</sup>, <em>J</em><sub><em>I</em></sub> <em>female</em> 1.57 (1.89) kJ/m<sup>2</sup> and <em>J</em><sub><em>I</em></sub> <em>male</em> 4.03 (±3.32) kJ/m<sup>2</sup>) and varies with age. More experimental work should be carried out to confirm the extrapolation of these conclusions to the other fracture modes tested here.</div><div>Although these results are influenced by the age range and the age gap within the group of donors, the primary data presented here is valuable to those wishing to predict crack evolution and propagation in the human cranial bone and may prove useful in developing failure criterion or simulations of skull fracture using Finite Element Analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 106821"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124004533","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The mechanical properties of the human skull have been examined and established previously in the literature, for example, the transversal isotropy of cranial bone and properties including the Elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio. However, despite the existing data, there are still mechanical properties which remain to be determined for the human skull. The present study aims to characterise the fracture properties of human cranial bone within the Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) framework. Unembalmed human (2 female and 3 male) cortical cranial bone samples were harvested from the frontal, and left and right parietal bones and were tested in Mode I (N = 124), Mode II (N = 31) and Mixed-Mode I-II (N = 47) loading conditions. For Mode I, samples were tested using Single Edge Notched Beams (SENB) under symmetric 3-point bending, while for Mixed-Mode I-II samples were tested under asymmetric 3-point bending. For Mode II, 4-point bend tests were carried out. All samples fractured in a brittle fashion. From these tests, reference values of stress intensity factor (KI and KII) and the strain energy release rate (JI, GI, GII, GI-II) for the frontal, left and right parietal bones were calculated. It was determined that the fracture toughness of the frontal, and left and right parietal bones are not statistically different from each other and that they exhibit symmetry about the sagittal plane. It was also demonstrated that, as is the case for other human bones and for the age range tested here, the fracture toughness of human cranial bone is lower for females (KIfemale 2.48 (±2.16) MPa∗m0.5, KImale 4.75 (±2.58) MPa∗m0.5, GIfemale 1.07 (±3.01) kJ/m2, GImale 1.85 (±1.93) kJ/m2, JIfemale 1.57 (1.89) kJ/m2 and JImale 4.03 (±3.32) kJ/m2) and varies with age. More experimental work should be carried out to confirm the extrapolation of these conclusions to the other fracture modes tested here.
Although these results are influenced by the age range and the age gap within the group of donors, the primary data presented here is valuable to those wishing to predict crack evolution and propagation in the human cranial bone and may prove useful in developing failure criterion or simulations of skull fracture using Finite Element Analysis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials.
The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.