Association between the focus of attention and brain activation pattern during golf putting task in amateur and novice: A fNIRS study.

Psychology of sport and exercise Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102793
Jingxuan Yu, Bowen Liu, Caixian Ruan, Hong Cao, Rui Fu, Zhanbing Ren
{"title":"Association between the focus of attention and brain activation pattern during golf putting task in amateur and novice: A fNIRS study.","authors":"Jingxuan Yu, Bowen Liu, Caixian Ruan, Hong Cao, Rui Fu, Zhanbing Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>External focus of attention (FOA) has been shown to improve motor performance. However, recent research has found that the effectiveness of FOA is related to the level of expertise. Therefore, this study examined the effects of FOA on putting performance in golfers of different levels of expertise. The neural mechanisms behind FOA were explored in conjunction with fNIRS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 30 participants, including 15 amateurs (M<sub>age</sub>: 23.31(SD = 1.32)years; 15 males) and 15 novices (M<sub>age</sub>: 22.69(SD = 1.55) years; 11 males; 4 females) were recruited. Participants completed EF and IF golf putting at a duration of 3s per time wearing fNIRS for 3 blocks of 30 s interspersed with 10-s rest blocks.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Behavioral results showed a significant difference in the putting performance of the amateur group under the EF condition compared to the IF condition (P = 0.019), and relative to novices, the amateur group performed better under the EF condition (P = 0.003). fNIRS results revealed that the amateur group had higher activation levels in the right somatosensory association cortex (RSAC) and right motor cortex (RMC) under the IF condition. In contrast, for the novice group, higher activation levels were observed in the left prefrontal cortex and RMC under the EF condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results revealed SAC and MC over-activation in the amateur group under IF conditions with poor golf putting performance. Our findings suggest that the impairment of automated motor neural networks could be a possible mechanism by which IF affects motor performance with SAC and MC over-activation. Guiding novices to focus on task-related factors consciously could be a potential mechanism by which EF enhances motor performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94181,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sport and exercise","volume":" ","pages":"102793"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of sport and exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: External focus of attention (FOA) has been shown to improve motor performance. However, recent research has found that the effectiveness of FOA is related to the level of expertise. Therefore, this study examined the effects of FOA on putting performance in golfers of different levels of expertise. The neural mechanisms behind FOA were explored in conjunction with fNIRS.

Method: A total of 30 participants, including 15 amateurs (Mage: 23.31(SD = 1.32)years; 15 males) and 15 novices (Mage: 22.69(SD = 1.55) years; 11 males; 4 females) were recruited. Participants completed EF and IF golf putting at a duration of 3s per time wearing fNIRS for 3 blocks of 30 s interspersed with 10-s rest blocks.

Result: Behavioral results showed a significant difference in the putting performance of the amateur group under the EF condition compared to the IF condition (P = 0.019), and relative to novices, the amateur group performed better under the EF condition (P = 0.003). fNIRS results revealed that the amateur group had higher activation levels in the right somatosensory association cortex (RSAC) and right motor cortex (RMC) under the IF condition. In contrast, for the novice group, higher activation levels were observed in the left prefrontal cortex and RMC under the EF condition.

Conclusions: Our results revealed SAC and MC over-activation in the amateur group under IF conditions with poor golf putting performance. Our findings suggest that the impairment of automated motor neural networks could be a possible mechanism by which IF affects motor performance with SAC and MC over-activation. Guiding novices to focus on task-related factors consciously could be a potential mechanism by which EF enhances motor performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
业余和新手高尔夫推杆过程中注意力集中与大脑激活模式的关系:一项近红外光谱研究。
目的:外部注意力集中(FOA)已被证明可以改善运动表现。然而,最近的研究发现,FOA的有效性与专业知识水平有关。因此,本研究考察了FOA对不同专业水平高尔夫球手推杆成绩的影响。结合近红外光谱研究了FOA背后的神经机制。方法:共30名参与者,其中业余爱好者15名(年龄:23.31(SD = 1.32)岁;15名男性)和15名新手(法师:22.69(SD = 1.55)岁;11男性;4名女性)被招募。参与者戴着fNIRS完成EF和IF高尔夫推杆,每次持续3秒,每次30秒,间隔10秒休息。结果:行为学结果显示,EF条件下业余组推杆成绩与IF条件下有显著差异(P = 0.019), EF条件下业余组推杆成绩优于新手(P = 0.003)。fNIRS结果显示,中频条件下,业余组右侧体感关联皮层(RSAC)和右侧运动皮层(RMC)的激活水平较高。相比之下,新手组在EF条件下,左前额叶皮层和RMC的激活水平更高。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在IF条件下,业余组SAC和MC过度激活,推杆成绩较差。我们的研究结果表明,自动运动神经网络的损伤可能是IF影响SAC和MC过度激活的运动表现的可能机制。引导新手有意识地关注任务相关因素可能是EF提高运动表现的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A psychological intervention reduces doping likelihood in Italian athletes: A replication and extension. Association between the focus of attention and brain activation pattern during golf putting task in amateur and novice: A fNIRS study. Body image experiences in retired Olympians: Losing the embodied self. Objectively measured physical activity and mental health among asylum seekers residing in a camp. Contextual and affective precursors of physical activity intention and enactment examined through ecological momentary assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1