Optimizing the Nonfungible Token Ecosystem: Effects of Business Models, Secondary Markets, and Royalties

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1109/TEM.2024.3500359
Xu Liu;He Xu;Stuart X. Zhu
{"title":"Optimizing the Nonfungible Token Ecosystem: Effects of Business Models, Secondary Markets, and Royalties","authors":"Xu Liu;He Xu;Stuart X. Zhu","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2024.3500359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adoption of blockchain technology has spurred significant growth in the global Non-fungible tokens (NFT) market, which distinguishes itself from traditional markets by features such as free second-hand transactions and creator royalties. To navigate this burgeoning landscape, diverse business models have emerged, such as No secondary market and no royalties, Secondary market but no royalties, and Secondary market with royalties (mandatory royalty). In response, our theoretical model delves into the impact of these models on creator decisions, profits, consumer surplus, and social welfare. The NFT secondary market proves pivotal, enabling creators to set higher prices and enhance profits. Interestingly, introducing a creator royalty, under certain conditions, further boosts profits. Contrary to expectations, a low royalty doesn't always harm consumers; in fact, a sufficiently high royalty prompts creators to lower regular selling prices, fostering secondary transactions and expanding consumer surplus. Beyond the secondary market's conventional role in improving social welfare, our research reveals that a well-calibrated royalty, coupled with creator investment in NFT quality, can amplify social welfare. A low royalty incentivizes creators to prioritize highquality NFT production. We also scrutinize mandatory versus optional royalty policies (Consumer Optional Royalty), finding that the creator's profit is higher under the optional royalty framework with moderate or substantial royalties. We recommend that NFT creators opt for a medium royalty rate when given the choice to set it themselves. Otherwise, in instances where the royalty rate is predetermined, creators are better with mandatory (optional) royalty when royalty is small (large).","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"71 ","pages":"15525-15539"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10755167/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adoption of blockchain technology has spurred significant growth in the global Non-fungible tokens (NFT) market, which distinguishes itself from traditional markets by features such as free second-hand transactions and creator royalties. To navigate this burgeoning landscape, diverse business models have emerged, such as No secondary market and no royalties, Secondary market but no royalties, and Secondary market with royalties (mandatory royalty). In response, our theoretical model delves into the impact of these models on creator decisions, profits, consumer surplus, and social welfare. The NFT secondary market proves pivotal, enabling creators to set higher prices and enhance profits. Interestingly, introducing a creator royalty, under certain conditions, further boosts profits. Contrary to expectations, a low royalty doesn't always harm consumers; in fact, a sufficiently high royalty prompts creators to lower regular selling prices, fostering secondary transactions and expanding consumer surplus. Beyond the secondary market's conventional role in improving social welfare, our research reveals that a well-calibrated royalty, coupled with creator investment in NFT quality, can amplify social welfare. A low royalty incentivizes creators to prioritize highquality NFT production. We also scrutinize mandatory versus optional royalty policies (Consumer Optional Royalty), finding that the creator's profit is higher under the optional royalty framework with moderate or substantial royalties. We recommend that NFT creators opt for a medium royalty rate when given the choice to set it themselves. Otherwise, in instances where the royalty rate is predetermined, creators are better with mandatory (optional) royalty when royalty is small (large).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化不可替代的代币生态系统:商业模式、二级市场和版税的影响
区块链技术的采用刺激了全球不可替代代币(NFT)市场的显着增长,该市场与传统市场的区别在于免费二手交易和创作者版税等特征。为了适应这一新兴市场,各种商业模式应运而生,如无二级市场且无版税,二级市场但无版税,二级市场有版税(强制版税)。作为回应,我们的理论模型深入研究了这些模型对创造者决策、利润、消费者剩余和社会福利的影响。事实证明,NFT二级市场至关重要,它使创作者能够设定更高的价格并提高利润。有趣的是,在某些情况下,引入创作者版税会进一步提高利润。与预期相反,低版税并不总是伤害消费者;事实上,足够高的版税会促使创作者降低正常销售价格,促进二次交易,扩大消费者剩余。除了二级市场在改善社会福利方面的传统作用之外,我们的研究表明,精心校准的版税,加上创作者对NFT质量的投资,可以扩大社会福利。低版税激励创作者优先考虑高质量的NFT产品。我们还仔细研究了强制性版税与可选版税政策(消费者可选版税),发现在适度或可观版税的可选版税框架下,创作者的利润更高。我们建议NFT创作者在自己设定版税时选择中等版税。否则,在版税率是预先确定的情况下,当版税小(大)时,创作者最好使用强制性(可选)版税。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
期刊最新文献
2024 Index IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Vol. 71 Performance Surplus Inconsistency and Firm Innovation: Evidence From China Quality 4.0 Key Dimensions and Implementation Profiles in Organizations of Excellence: A Cluster Analysis IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Society Publication Information Unpacking the Mechanism of the Economic Impact of University Interdisciplinary Research: A Topic Modeling Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1