The Effects of Eliminating Idiomatic American English From High-Stakes Nursing Examinations.

Timothy M Parker, Kathleen O'Connell
{"title":"The Effects of Eliminating Idiomatic American English From High-Stakes Nursing Examinations.","authors":"Timothy M Parker, Kathleen O'Connell","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240725-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) health care providers are important to the nursing workforce but often face challenges when taking the NCLEX-RN examination. This study evaluated the effects of removing slang and words with multiple meanings from high-stakes examination questions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study used a quantitative, experimental posttest-only control group design and included a convenience sample of 169 nursing students from a college in southern Florida.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nursing students performed significantly better on the experimental (<i>M</i> = 79.9 [7.48]) than on the control examination (<i>M</i> = 75.08 [10.51]), <i>t</i>(151.8) = 2.973, <i>p</i> = .003. Students with low language acculturation scores achieved significantly higher scores on the experimental (<i>M</i> = 81.48 [<i>SD</i> = 6.05]) versus the control examinations (<i>M</i> = 72.21 [10.09]), <i>t</i>(60.9) = 4.975, <i>p</i> = .001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modifying examination questions linguistically can help ESOL nursing students perform better and aid examination creators to design bias-free tests. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(12):818-825.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":"63 12","pages":"818-825"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240725-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the United States, English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) health care providers are important to the nursing workforce but often face challenges when taking the NCLEX-RN examination. This study evaluated the effects of removing slang and words with multiple meanings from high-stakes examination questions.

Method: This study used a quantitative, experimental posttest-only control group design and included a convenience sample of 169 nursing students from a college in southern Florida.

Results: Nursing students performed significantly better on the experimental (M = 79.9 [7.48]) than on the control examination (M = 75.08 [10.51]), t(151.8) = 2.973, p = .003. Students with low language acculturation scores achieved significantly higher scores on the experimental (M = 81.48 [SD = 6.05]) versus the control examinations (M = 72.21 [10.09]), t(60.9) = 4.975, p = .001.

Conclusion: Modifying examination questions linguistically can help ESOL nursing students perform better and aid examination creators to design bias-free tests. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(12):818-825.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Clinical Exposure on Examination Performance of Nursing Students. Understanding NCLEX-RN Repeat Writers' Learning Needs: A Pilot Developmental Design Research Study. "They Assume I'm Not Intelligent Just Because I Have an Accent": Supporting Retention of Nursing Students Who Speak English as an Additional Language. Care of the Transgender Surgical Client: A Video Simulation for Baccalaureate Nursing Students. Developing a Pilot Curriculum to Enhance Undergraduate Student Well-Being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1