Health System Expansion and Changes in Medicare Beneficiary Utilization of Safety Net Providers.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002083
Kun Li, José J Escarce, Shiyuan Zhang, Denis Agniel, Maria DeYoreo, Justin W Timbie
{"title":"Health System Expansion and Changes in Medicare Beneficiary Utilization of Safety Net Providers.","authors":"Kun Li, José J Escarce, Shiyuan Zhang, Denis Agniel, Maria DeYoreo, Justin W Timbie","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence is limited on insured patients' use of safety net providers as vertically integrated health systems spread throughout the United States.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine whether market-level health system penetration is associated with: (1) switches in Medicare beneficiaries' usual source of primary care from federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) to health systems; and (2) FQHCs' overall Medicare patient and visit volume.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Beneficiary-level discrete-time survival analysis and market-level linear regression analysis using Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2013 to 2018.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>A total of 659,652 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 and older lived in one of 27,386 empirically derived primary care markets whose usual source of care in 2013 was an FQHC or a non-FQHC-independent physician organization that predominantly served low-income patients.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Beneficiary-year measure of the probability of switching to health system-affiliated physician organizations and market-year measures of the number of FQHC visits by Medicare beneficiaries, number of beneficiaries attributed to FQHCs, and FQHC Medicare market shares.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 2013-2018, 16.5% of beneficiaries who sought care from FQHCs switched to health systems. When health system penetration increases from the 25th to 75th percentile, the probability of Medicare FQHC patient switching increases by 4.6 percentage points, with 22 fewer Medicare FQHC visits and 4 fewer beneficiaries attributed to FQHCs per market year. Complex patients and patients who sought care from non-FQHC, independent physician organizations exhibited higher rates of switching to health systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health system expansion was associated with the loss of Medicare patients by FQHCs, suggesting potential negative spillovers of vertical integration on independent safety net providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":"63 1","pages":"18-26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence is limited on insured patients' use of safety net providers as vertically integrated health systems spread throughout the United States.

Objectives: To examine whether market-level health system penetration is associated with: (1) switches in Medicare beneficiaries' usual source of primary care from federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) to health systems; and (2) FQHCs' overall Medicare patient and visit volume.

Research design: Beneficiary-level discrete-time survival analysis and market-level linear regression analysis using Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2013 to 2018.

Subjects: A total of 659,652 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 and older lived in one of 27,386 empirically derived primary care markets whose usual source of care in 2013 was an FQHC or a non-FQHC-independent physician organization that predominantly served low-income patients.

Measures: Beneficiary-year measure of the probability of switching to health system-affiliated physician organizations and market-year measures of the number of FQHC visits by Medicare beneficiaries, number of beneficiaries attributed to FQHCs, and FQHC Medicare market shares.

Results: During 2013-2018, 16.5% of beneficiaries who sought care from FQHCs switched to health systems. When health system penetration increases from the 25th to 75th percentile, the probability of Medicare FQHC patient switching increases by 4.6 percentage points, with 22 fewer Medicare FQHC visits and 4 fewer beneficiaries attributed to FQHCs per market year. Complex patients and patients who sought care from non-FQHC, independent physician organizations exhibited higher rates of switching to health systems.

Conclusions: Health system expansion was associated with the loss of Medicare patients by FQHCs, suggesting potential negative spillovers of vertical integration on independent safety net providers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗系统的扩张和医疗保险受益人利用安全网提供者的变化。
背景:有保险的患者使用安全网提供者的证据有限,因为垂直整合的卫生系统遍布美国。目的:研究市场层面的卫生系统渗透是否与以下因素有关:(1)医疗保险受益人通常的初级保健来源从联邦合格卫生中心(FQHCs)转向卫生系统;(2) fqhc的总体医保患者和就诊人数。研究设计:使用2013 - 2018年医疗保险按服务收费索赔数据进行受益人水平离散时间生存分析和市场水平线性回归分析。受试者:共有659,652名65岁及以上的医疗保险按服务收费受益人生活在27,386个经验得出的初级保健市场之一,这些市场在2013年通常的护理来源是FQHC或非FQHC独立的医生组织,主要服务于低收入患者。测量方法:受益人年度测量转换到卫生系统附属医生组织的可能性,市场年度测量医疗保险受益人访问FQHC的次数,归因于FQHC的受益人人数,以及FQHC医疗保险市场份额。结果:2013-2018年期间,16.5%从fqhc寻求治疗的受益人转向卫生系统。当卫生系统渗透率从第25个百分点增加到第75个百分点时,医疗保险FQHC患者转换的概率增加4.6个百分点,每个市场年医疗保险FQHC就诊减少22次,FQHC受益人减少4次。复杂患者和从非fqhc、独立医生组织寻求治疗的患者显示出更高的转用卫生系统的比率。结论:卫生系统扩张与fqhc的医疗保险患者流失有关,表明垂直整合对独立安全网提供者可能产生负面溢出效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of Community-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury: A Cohort Study of US Veterans. Factors Associated With Psychotherapist and Psychiatrist Participation in Public Insurance: Evidence From Georgia State. Medicare Accountable Care Organization Treatment of Serious Mental Illness: Associations Between Behavioral Health Integration Activities and Outcomes. Audio-Based Care for Managing Chronic Conditions in Adults: A Systematic Review. Audio-Based Care for Managing Diabetes in Adults: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1