The Use of a Digital Well-Being App (Stay Strong App) With Indigenous People in Prison: Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Jmir Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.2196/53280
Elke Perdacher, David Kavanagh, Jeanie Sheffield, Penny Dale, Edward Heffernan
{"title":"The Use of a Digital Well-Being App (Stay Strong App) With Indigenous People in Prison: Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Elke Perdacher, David Kavanagh, Jeanie Sheffield, Penny Dale, Edward Heffernan","doi":"10.2196/53280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indigenous Australians in custody experience much greater rates of poor mental health and well-being than those of the general community, and these problems are not adequately addressed. Digital mental health strategies offer innovative opportunities to address the problems, but little is known about their feasibility in or impact on this population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to conduct a pilot trial evaluating the impact of adding the Stay Strong app to mental health and well-being services for Indigenous women and men in custody. The trial compared immediate and 3-month delayed use of the app by the health service, assessing its effects on well-being, empowerment, and psychological distress at 3 and 6 months after the baseline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Indigenous participants were recruited from 3 high-security Australian prisons from January 2017 to September 2019. The outcome measures assessed well-being (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale), empowerment (Growth and Empowerment Measure [GEM]-giving total, 14-item Emotional Empowerment Scale, and 12 Scenarios scores), and psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale). Intention-to-treat effects on these outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Substantial challenges in obtaining ethical and institutional approval for the trial were encountered, as were difficulties in timely recruitment and retention due to staff shortages and the release of participants from prison before follow-up assessments and an inability to follow up with participants after release. A total of 132 prisoners (age: mean 33, SD 8 y) were randomized into either an immediate (n=82) or a delayed treatment (n=52) group. However, only 56 (42.4%) could be assessed at 3 months and 37 (28%) at 6 months, raising questions concerning the representativeness of the results. Linear improvements over time were seen in all outcomes (GEM total: Cohen d=0.99; GEM 14-item Emotional Empowerment Scale: Cohen d=0.94; GEM 12 Scenarios: Cohen d=0.87; Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale: Cohen d=0.76; Kessler Psychological Distress Scale: Cohen d=0.49), but no differential effects for group or the addition of the Stay Strong app were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We believe this to be Australia's first evaluation of a digital mental health app in prison and the first among Indigenous people in custody. While the study demonstrated that the use of a well-being app within a prison was feasible, staff shortages led to delayed recruitment and a consequent low retention, and significant beneficial effects of the app's use within a forensic mental health service were not seen. Additional staff resources and a longer intervention may be needed to allow a demonstration of satisfactory retention and impact in future research.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ANZCTR ACTRN12624001261505; https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12624001261505.aspx.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e53280"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jmir Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53280","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Indigenous Australians in custody experience much greater rates of poor mental health and well-being than those of the general community, and these problems are not adequately addressed. Digital mental health strategies offer innovative opportunities to address the problems, but little is known about their feasibility in or impact on this population.

Objective: This study aims to conduct a pilot trial evaluating the impact of adding the Stay Strong app to mental health and well-being services for Indigenous women and men in custody. The trial compared immediate and 3-month delayed use of the app by the health service, assessing its effects on well-being, empowerment, and psychological distress at 3 and 6 months after the baseline.

Methods: Indigenous participants were recruited from 3 high-security Australian prisons from January 2017 to September 2019. The outcome measures assessed well-being (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale), empowerment (Growth and Empowerment Measure [GEM]-giving total, 14-item Emotional Empowerment Scale, and 12 Scenarios scores), and psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale). Intention-to-treat effects on these outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed models.

Results: Substantial challenges in obtaining ethical and institutional approval for the trial were encountered, as were difficulties in timely recruitment and retention due to staff shortages and the release of participants from prison before follow-up assessments and an inability to follow up with participants after release. A total of 132 prisoners (age: mean 33, SD 8 y) were randomized into either an immediate (n=82) or a delayed treatment (n=52) group. However, only 56 (42.4%) could be assessed at 3 months and 37 (28%) at 6 months, raising questions concerning the representativeness of the results. Linear improvements over time were seen in all outcomes (GEM total: Cohen d=0.99; GEM 14-item Emotional Empowerment Scale: Cohen d=0.94; GEM 12 Scenarios: Cohen d=0.87; Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale: Cohen d=0.76; Kessler Psychological Distress Scale: Cohen d=0.49), but no differential effects for group or the addition of the Stay Strong app were found.

Conclusions: We believe this to be Australia's first evaluation of a digital mental health app in prison and the first among Indigenous people in custody. While the study demonstrated that the use of a well-being app within a prison was feasible, staff shortages led to delayed recruitment and a consequent low retention, and significant beneficial effects of the app's use within a forensic mental health service were not seen. Additional staff resources and a longer intervention may be needed to allow a demonstration of satisfactory retention and impact in future research.

Trial registration: ANZCTR ACTRN12624001261505; https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12624001261505.aspx.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在监狱中使用数字健康应用程序(Stay Strong应用程序):随机对照试验。
背景:与一般社区相比,被拘留的澳大利亚土著居民心理健康和福祉状况不佳的比例要高得多,而这些问题没有得到充分解决。数字心理健康战略为解决这些问题提供了创新机会,但人们对其在这一人群中的可行性或影响知之甚少。目的:本研究旨在开展一项试点试验,评估将Stay Strong应用程序添加到被拘留的土著男女的心理健康和福祉服务中的影响。该试验比较了卫生服务部门立即和延迟3个月使用该应用程序的情况,评估了其在基线后3个月和6个月对幸福感、赋权和心理困扰的影响。方法:2017年1月至2019年9月,从澳大利亚3所高安全级别监狱招募土著参与者。结果测量评估了幸福感(沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表),赋权(成长和赋权测量[GEM]-给出总数,14项情绪赋权量表,12个场景得分)和心理困扰(凯斯勒心理困扰量表)。使用线性混合模型分析意向治疗对这些结果的影响。结果:在获得试验的伦理和制度批准方面遇到了重大挑战,由于工作人员短缺和在后续评估之前将参与者从监狱释放以及在释放参与者后无法对参与者进行随访,因此在及时招聘和保留方面遇到了困难。共有132名囚犯(平均年龄33岁,标准差8岁)被随机分为立即治疗组(n=82)和延迟治疗组(n=52)。然而,只有56例(42.4%)在3个月时可以评估,37例(28%)在6个月时可以评估,这引起了对结果代表性的质疑。随着时间的推移,所有结果均出现线性改善(GEM total: Cohen d=0.99;GEM 14项情绪授权量表:Cohen d=0.94;GEM 12情景:Cohen d=0.87;沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表:Cohen d=0.76;Kessler心理困扰量表:Cohen d=0.49),但没有发现不同组或添加Stay Strong应用程序的差异效应。结论:我们认为这是澳大利亚首次对监狱中的数字心理健康应用程序进行评估,也是首次对在押土著人进行评估。虽然该研究表明,在监狱内使用健康应用程序是可行的,但人员短缺导致招聘延迟,因此保留率低,并且在法医心理健康服务中使用应用程序的显着有益效果未见。可能需要额外的工作人员资源和更长时间的干预,以便在今后的研究中证明令人满意的保留和影响。试验注册:ANZCTR ACTRN12624001261505;https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12624001261505.aspx。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jmir Mental Health
Jmir Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
104
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Mental Health (JMH, ISSN 2368-7959) is a PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed sister journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR Mental Health focusses on digital health and Internet interventions, technologies and electronic innovations (software and hardware) for mental health, addictions, online counselling and behaviour change. This includes formative evaluation and system descriptions, theoretical papers, review papers, viewpoint/vision papers, and rigorous evaluations.
期刊最新文献
Role of Tailored Timing and Frequency Prompts on the Efficacy of an Internet-Delivered Stress Recovery Intervention for Health Care Workers: Randomized Controlled Trial. Establishment and Maintenance of a Digital Therapeutic Alliance in People Living With Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia: Two Exploratory Single-Arm Studies. Exploring the Psychological and Physiological Insights Through Digital Phenotyping by Analyzing the Discrepancies Between Subjective Insomnia Severity and Activity-Based Objective Sleep Measures: Observational Cohort Study. Effectiveness of Digital Mental Health Interventions in the Workplace: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews. Integrating Videoconferencing Therapist Guidance Into Stepped Care Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Child and Adolescent Anxiety: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1