Disentangling the ‘digital’: A critical review of information technology capabilities, information technology–enabled capabilities and digital capabilities in business research

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Management Reviews Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1111/ijmr.12389
Marica Grego, Marcin Bartosiak, Biagio Palese, Gabriele Piccoli, Stefano Denicolai
{"title":"Disentangling the ‘digital’: A critical review of information technology capabilities, information technology–enabled capabilities and digital capabilities in business research","authors":"Marica Grego, Marcin Bartosiak, Biagio Palese, Gabriele Piccoli, Stefano Denicolai","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.12389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business and management scholars have always placed a strong emphasis on the study of capabilities. As digital technology moves from the back office to the forefront of digital innovation and transformation, organizations increasingly recognize the vital role of their digital‐related capabilities. Yet, despite the attention, substantial confusion remains in the cross‐disciplinary management and business literature, caused by conflating related, yet distinct, constructs: information technology (IT) capabilities, IT‐enabled capabilities and digital capabilities. Our objective in this article is twofold. First, we analyse the capability literature across business research areas to identify weaknesses, contradictions, controversies or inconsistencies regarding ‘IT’ and ‘digital’ constructs. We do so by conducting a theory‐driven critical review encompassing 360 studies in fields ranging from accounting to strategy. Second, our article advances a theoretical framework that clarifies the differences across IT capabilities, IT‐enabled capabilities and digital capabilities. It also provides solid ground for future inquiry by ensuring reliable knowledge accumulation while pointing research attention to unique and novel research questions.","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12389","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Business and management scholars have always placed a strong emphasis on the study of capabilities. As digital technology moves from the back office to the forefront of digital innovation and transformation, organizations increasingly recognize the vital role of their digital‐related capabilities. Yet, despite the attention, substantial confusion remains in the cross‐disciplinary management and business literature, caused by conflating related, yet distinct, constructs: information technology (IT) capabilities, IT‐enabled capabilities and digital capabilities. Our objective in this article is twofold. First, we analyse the capability literature across business research areas to identify weaknesses, contradictions, controversies or inconsistencies regarding ‘IT’ and ‘digital’ constructs. We do so by conducting a theory‐driven critical review encompassing 360 studies in fields ranging from accounting to strategy. Second, our article advances a theoretical framework that clarifies the differences across IT capabilities, IT‐enabled capabilities and digital capabilities. It also provides solid ground for future inquiry by ensuring reliable knowledge accumulation while pointing research attention to unique and novel research questions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解开“数字化”:对商业研究中信息技术能力、信息技术支持能力和数字能力的批判性回顾
工商管理学者一直非常重视对能力的研究。随着数字技术从后台转移到数字创新和转型的前沿,组织越来越认识到其数字相关能力的重要作用。然而,尽管受到关注,跨学科管理和商业文献中仍然存在实质性的混淆,这是由合并相关但不同的结构造成的:信息技术(IT)能力、IT启用能力和数字能力。本文的目的有两个。首先,我们分析跨业务研究领域的能力文献,以确定关于“IT”和“数字”结构的弱点、矛盾、争议或不一致。我们通过进行理论驱动的批判性审查,包括从会计到战略等领域的360项研究。其次,我们的文章提出了一个理论框架,澄清了IT能力、IT支持能力和数字能力之间的差异。它还通过确保可靠的知识积累,同时将研究注意力指向独特和新颖的研究问题,为未来的研究提供坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.
期刊最新文献
Interactional governing activities: A novel perspective on how actors co‐develop field governance Issue information Reflecting back and looking forward: A systematic literature review of SME–university collaborations Deceptive signalling: Causes, consequences and remedies Conceptualising SME brand co‐creation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1