Flume investigation of debris flow entrained boulders with cylindrical baffles and a rigid barrier

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Engineering Geology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107836
Beom-Jun Kim , Chan-Young Yune
{"title":"Flume investigation of debris flow entrained boulders with cylindrical baffles and a rigid barrier","authors":"Beom-Jun Kim ,&nbsp;Chan-Young Yune","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Large boulders entrained by debris flow can generate destructive impact force and cause significant damage to a rigid barrier located downstream. Baffle arrays can be installed in front of the rigid barrier to reduce the potential damage from large boulders by dissipating flow energy with filtering boulders from the debris flows. In this study, to investigate the effect of baffle arrays on the flow behavior and the dynamic impact force of debris flows acting on the terminal barrier, small-scale flume experiments were performed with various baffle configurations. After the experiments, the dynamic flow behavior with boulders, impact forces, and travel distances of boulders, were analyzed with transverse blockage ratios and numbers of baffle rows. As a result, entrained boulders in debris flows significantly increased impact force about six times. With the installations of baffle arrays, however, peak impact force decreased by an average of 70 % and by up to 94 %. In addition, increasing the number of rows of baffles from one to two led to an average reduction of 50 % in impact force for each transverse blockage ratio. However, in the case of one row of baffles, the impact force reduction for high <em>s/δ</em> values proved to be less effective compared to the other baffle configurations. Finally, the results of this study can provide appropriate ranges for the baffle spacing and the number of baffle rows in the baffle design to estimate the load attenuation due to boulder filtration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"344 ","pages":"Article 107836"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795224004368","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large boulders entrained by debris flow can generate destructive impact force and cause significant damage to a rigid barrier located downstream. Baffle arrays can be installed in front of the rigid barrier to reduce the potential damage from large boulders by dissipating flow energy with filtering boulders from the debris flows. In this study, to investigate the effect of baffle arrays on the flow behavior and the dynamic impact force of debris flows acting on the terminal barrier, small-scale flume experiments were performed with various baffle configurations. After the experiments, the dynamic flow behavior with boulders, impact forces, and travel distances of boulders, were analyzed with transverse blockage ratios and numbers of baffle rows. As a result, entrained boulders in debris flows significantly increased impact force about six times. With the installations of baffle arrays, however, peak impact force decreased by an average of 70 % and by up to 94 %. In addition, increasing the number of rows of baffles from one to two led to an average reduction of 50 % in impact force for each transverse blockage ratio. However, in the case of one row of baffles, the impact force reduction for high s/δ values proved to be less effective compared to the other baffle configurations. Finally, the results of this study can provide appropriate ranges for the baffle spacing and the number of baffle rows in the baffle design to estimate the load attenuation due to boulder filtration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带有圆柱形挡板和刚性屏障的泥石流夹带巨石的水槽研究
被泥石流夹带的大块巨石会产生破坏性的冲击力,对位于下游的刚性屏障造成重大破坏。在刚性屏障前安装折流板阵列,通过过滤泥石流中的巨石来耗散水流能量,从而降低巨石的潜在危害。为了研究折流板阵列对流动特性的影响以及泥石流对末端屏障的动态冲击力,本研究采用不同折流板配置进行了小规模水槽试验。实验结束后,以横向堵塞比和挡板数为参数,分析了岩石的动态流动特性、冲击力和岩石的移动距离。结果,泥石流中夹带的巨石显著增加了冲击力约6倍。然而,随着挡板阵列的安装,峰值冲击力平均下降了70%,最高可达94%。此外,将挡板的排数从一排增加到两排,导致每个横向堵塞比的冲击力平均降低50%。然而,在单排挡板的情况下,高s/δ值挡板的减震力效果不如其他挡板。最后,本文的研究结果可以为设计中挡板间距和挡板排数提供合适的范围,以估计由于巨石过滤引起的载荷衰减。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Geology
Engineering Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
12.20%
发文量
327
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of morphological features and mechanical behavior of jointed limestone subjected to wet-dry cycles and cyclic shear in drawdown areas of the Three Gorges Reservoir Efficient probabilistic tunning of large geological model (LGM) for underground digital twin Flash flood impacts and vulnerability mapping at catchment scale: Insights from southern Apennines The mechanisms of salt weathering responsible for sandstone deterioration in the Yungang Grottoes, China Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1