External validation of the Memory Assessment Clinics Scale for Epilepsy (MAC-E).

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Epilepsy & Behavior Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110168
Kayela Arrotta, Brittany Lapin, Margaret Miller, Thomas Hogan, William B Barr, Daniel Friedman, Erica Cotton, Stephan Schuele, Samuel Wiebe, Lara Jehi, Robyn M Busch
{"title":"External validation of the Memory Assessment Clinics Scale for Epilepsy (MAC-E).","authors":"Kayela Arrotta, Brittany Lapin, Margaret Miller, Thomas Hogan, William B Barr, Daniel Friedman, Erica Cotton, Stephan Schuele, Samuel Wiebe, Lara Jehi, Robyn M Busch","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to externally validate the Memory Assessment Clinics Scale for Epilepsy (MAC-E), a brief self-report measure of subjective memory complaints in adults with epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted including adults with focal pharmacoresistant epilepsy from three Level 4 epilepsy centers in the U.S., who completed the MAC-E as part of a clinical neuropsychological evaluation. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted, and goodness-of-fit criteria were calculated to assess model fit: comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized root mean residual (SRMR). Item response theory models were constructed, and Mokken analysis was used to assess discrimination and unidimensionality. Internal consistency was evaluated with McDonald's Omega.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 191 patients included in the study (mean age = 41 ± 14, 51 % female, 87 % white race). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the 5-factor structure of the MAC-E identified in prior research (CFI = 0.989, RMSEA = 0.056, SRMR = 0.069) with high standardized loadings and R<sup>2</sup> values for each of the 5 factors (0.58-0.91 and 0.34-0.82, respectively). MAC-E items demonstrated high levels of discrimination as well as the ability to evaluate across the entirety of each latent trait. Score responses were uniformly distributed across latent traits, and unidimensionality was established by factor (all H coefficients > 0.4). Internal consistency was high across factors (omega range: 0.77-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results of this study demonstrate good external validation of the MAC-E in an independent, multicenter cohort of adults with epilepsy. These findings provide further support that the MAC-E is a psychometrically valid, self-report instrument to assess every-day memory abilities in adults with epilepsy in both clinical and research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"163 ","pages":"110168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to externally validate the Memory Assessment Clinics Scale for Epilepsy (MAC-E), a brief self-report measure of subjective memory complaints in adults with epilepsy.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted including adults with focal pharmacoresistant epilepsy from three Level 4 epilepsy centers in the U.S., who completed the MAC-E as part of a clinical neuropsychological evaluation. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted, and goodness-of-fit criteria were calculated to assess model fit: comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized root mean residual (SRMR). Item response theory models were constructed, and Mokken analysis was used to assess discrimination and unidimensionality. Internal consistency was evaluated with McDonald's Omega.

Results: There were 191 patients included in the study (mean age = 41 ± 14, 51 % female, 87 % white race). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the 5-factor structure of the MAC-E identified in prior research (CFI = 0.989, RMSEA = 0.056, SRMR = 0.069) with high standardized loadings and R2 values for each of the 5 factors (0.58-0.91 and 0.34-0.82, respectively). MAC-E items demonstrated high levels of discrimination as well as the ability to evaluate across the entirety of each latent trait. Score responses were uniformly distributed across latent traits, and unidimensionality was established by factor (all H coefficients > 0.4). Internal consistency was high across factors (omega range: 0.77-0.88).

Conclusions: Results of this study demonstrate good external validation of the MAC-E in an independent, multicenter cohort of adults with epilepsy. These findings provide further support that the MAC-E is a psychometrically valid, self-report instrument to assess every-day memory abilities in adults with epilepsy in both clinical and research settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癫痫记忆评估临床量表(MAC-E)的外部验证
目的:本研究旨在外部验证癫痫记忆评估临床量表(MAC-E),这是一种用于评估成人癫痫患者主观记忆抱怨的简短自我报告量表。方法:横断面研究包括来自美国三个4级癫痫中心的局灶性耐药癫痫患者,他们完成了MAC-E作为临床神经心理学评估的一部分。进行验证性因子分析,并计算拟合优度标准来评估模型拟合:比较拟合指数(CFI)、近似均方根误差(RMSEA)和标准化均方根残差(SRMR)。构建项目反应理论模型,并采用Mokken分析法评估歧视和单一性。内部一致性是用麦当劳的Omega来评估的。结果:共纳入191例患者(平均年龄41±14岁,女性51%,白人87%)。验证性因子分析支持前期研究确定的MAC-E的5因素结构(CFI = 0.989, RMSEA = 0.056, SRMR = 0.069),具有较高的标准化负荷,5个因素的R2值分别为0.58-0.91和0.34-0.82。MAC-E项目显示出高水平的辨别能力以及评估每个潜在特质的整体能力。得分反应在各潜在性状间均匀分布,以因子确定其单维性(所有H系数均为> 0.4)。各因素的内部一致性很高(ω范围:0.77-0.88)。结论:本研究结果在独立的多中心成人癫痫患者队列中证明了MAC-E的良好外部验证。这些发现进一步支持MAC-E是一种心理测量学上有效的自我报告工具,用于评估临床和研究环境中成人癫痫患者的日常记忆能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
期刊最新文献
A computer-assisted rehabilitation program improves self-management, cognition, and quality of life in epilepsy: A randomized controlled trial. Caregiving burden for adults with epilepsy and coping strategies, a systematic review. Cognitive and behavioral impact of antiseizure medications, neuromodulation, ketogenic diet, and surgery in lennox-gastaut syndrome: A comprehensive review. Incidence of RINCH in pediatric EMU patients. The attitude of medical students, resident doctors, and nurses toward people with epilepsy: A multi-centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1