Sequencing bispecific antibodies and CAR T cells for FL.

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1182/hematology.2024000667
David A Russler-Germain, Nancy L Bartlett
{"title":"Sequencing bispecific antibodies and CAR T cells for FL.","authors":"David A Russler-Germain, Nancy L Bartlett","doi":"10.1182/hematology.2024000667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment for relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) has evolved over recent years with the introduction of multiple novel immunotherapies: anti-CD3  ×  CD20 bispecific antibody (BsAb) T-cell engagers and anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T). Both drug classes are highly active, and their adverse event profiles overlap considerably, with cytokine release syndrome, cytopenias, and infections being most common. However, key differences include accessibility and logistical considerations as well as distinct neurologic toxicities, which make recommending a BsAb or CAR T a nuanced decision for each patient with R/R FL. Notably, patients could receive both classes of therapies in sequence; however, data guiding this decision are sparse. Considering the 3 most advanced agents in each class, we generally favor BsAbs before CAR T as the standard-of-care third-line treatment for the typical patient with R/R FL without concern for aggressive histologic transformation (HT). This is based on a 3-year follow-up of the mosunetuzumab phase 2 trial in R/R FL highlighting durable complete responses after a time-limited therapy with an acceptable safety profile for patients of all ages and reasonable performance status. We generally prioritize CAR T before BsAbs for patients with proven or suspected HT given the curative-potential of this approach based on trial data from R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; it is unknown whether BsAbs offer the same long-term benefit in transformed FL. Overall, with the ability to personalize the sequencing of BsAbs and CAR T, the recently expanding portfolio of highly effective immunotherapies for R/R FL is poised to offer considerable benefit to this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12973,"journal":{"name":"Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program","volume":"2024 1","pages":"310-317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/hematology.2024000667","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment for relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) has evolved over recent years with the introduction of multiple novel immunotherapies: anti-CD3  ×  CD20 bispecific antibody (BsAb) T-cell engagers and anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T). Both drug classes are highly active, and their adverse event profiles overlap considerably, with cytokine release syndrome, cytopenias, and infections being most common. However, key differences include accessibility and logistical considerations as well as distinct neurologic toxicities, which make recommending a BsAb or CAR T a nuanced decision for each patient with R/R FL. Notably, patients could receive both classes of therapies in sequence; however, data guiding this decision are sparse. Considering the 3 most advanced agents in each class, we generally favor BsAbs before CAR T as the standard-of-care third-line treatment for the typical patient with R/R FL without concern for aggressive histologic transformation (HT). This is based on a 3-year follow-up of the mosunetuzumab phase 2 trial in R/R FL highlighting durable complete responses after a time-limited therapy with an acceptable safety profile for patients of all ages and reasonable performance status. We generally prioritize CAR T before BsAbs for patients with proven or suspected HT given the curative-potential of this approach based on trial data from R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; it is unknown whether BsAbs offer the same long-term benefit in transformed FL. Overall, with the ability to personalize the sequencing of BsAbs and CAR T, the recently expanding portfolio of highly effective immunotherapies for R/R FL is poised to offer considerable benefit to this patient population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FL的双特异性抗体和CAR - T细胞测序。
近年来,随着多种新型免疫疗法的引入,复发/难治性(R/R)滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)的治疗不断发展:抗cd3 × CD20双特异性抗体(BsAb) T细胞结合剂和抗cd19嵌合抗原受体T细胞(CAR - T)。这两种药物都具有高活性,其不良事件特征有很大的重叠,细胞因子释放综合征、细胞减少和感染是最常见的。然而,关键的差异包括可及性和后勤考虑以及不同的神经毒性,这使得推荐BsAb或CAR - T对每个R/R FL患者来说是一个微妙的决定。值得注意的是,患者可以依次接受这两类治疗;然而,指导这一决策的数据很少。考虑到每个类别中3种最先进的药物,我们通常倾向于在CAR - T之前使用bsab作为典型R/R FL患者的标准护理三线治疗,而无需考虑侵袭性组织学转化(HT)。这是基于对R/R FL的mosunetuzumab 2期试验的3年随访,强调在有限的时间治疗后持续完全缓解,对所有年龄的患者和合理的表现状态具有可接受的安全性。基于R/R弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤的试验数据,鉴于CAR - T疗法的治疗潜力,我们通常优先考虑CAR - T疗法,而不是bsab疗法。目前尚不清楚bsab是否能在转化的FL中提供相同的长期益处。总的来说,由于bsab和CAR - T的个性化测序能力,最近扩大的R/R FL高效免疫疗法组合有望为这一患者群体提供可观的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program
Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-HEMATOLOGY
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Hematology, the ASH Education Program, is published annually by the American Society of Hematology (ASH) in one volume per year.
期刊最新文献
Novel conditioning and prophylaxis regimens for relapse prevention. On the horizon: upcoming new agents for the management of ITP. Patient-reported outcomes after CAR T-cell therapy in patients with hematological malignancies. The POD24 challenge: where do we go from here for early progressors? Givosiran: a targeted treatment for acute intermittent porphyria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1