Proton beam and carbon ion radiotherapy in skull base chordoma: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression with trial sequential analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1007/s10143-024-03117-1
Amanda Cyntia Lima Fonseca Rodrigues, Salem M Tos, Ahmed Shaaban, Georgios Mantziaris, Daniel M Trifiletti, Jason Sheehan
{"title":"Proton beam and carbon ion radiotherapy in skull base chordoma: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression with trial sequential analysis.","authors":"Amanda Cyntia Lima Fonseca Rodrigues, Salem M Tos, Ahmed Shaaban, Georgios Mantziaris, Daniel M Trifiletti, Jason Sheehan","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03117-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chordomas are rare, locally aggressive tumors that have a high rate of recurrence, especially at the skull base. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for skull base chordoma. We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Ovid up to November 26, 2023, following the PRISMA statement. Studies involving more than 10 patients with skull base chordoma treated with PBT or CIRT were included. The outcomes analyzed were local control, overall survival, progression-free survival, and toxicities. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method and the inverse variance method. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 1,145 patients (671 treated with PBT and 474 with CIRT). No significant difference was found between PBT and CIRT for 5-year local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). The only timepoint with a difference in local control was at 3 years, when PBT showed an advantage in local control (90% vs. 83% for CIRT; p = 0.05) and progression-free survival was similar (94% for PBT vs. 83% for CIRT; p = 0.09). Sensitivity analysis and meta-regression revealed no significant influence of predefined parameters on outcomes. Publication bias was suggested by asymmetrical funnel plots. Both PBT and CIRT are effective treatments for skull base chordoma, with comparable long-term efficacy. This meta-analysis underscores the need for individualized treatment approaches and further research to refine these therapies in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03117-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chordomas are rare, locally aggressive tumors that have a high rate of recurrence, especially at the skull base. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for skull base chordoma. We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Ovid up to November 26, 2023, following the PRISMA statement. Studies involving more than 10 patients with skull base chordoma treated with PBT or CIRT were included. The outcomes analyzed were local control, overall survival, progression-free survival, and toxicities. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method and the inverse variance method. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 1,145 patients (671 treated with PBT and 474 with CIRT). No significant difference was found between PBT and CIRT for 5-year local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). The only timepoint with a difference in local control was at 3 years, when PBT showed an advantage in local control (90% vs. 83% for CIRT; p = 0.05) and progression-free survival was similar (94% for PBT vs. 83% for CIRT; p = 0.09). Sensitivity analysis and meta-regression revealed no significant influence of predefined parameters on outcomes. Publication bias was suggested by asymmetrical funnel plots. Both PBT and CIRT are effective treatments for skull base chordoma, with comparable long-term efficacy. This meta-analysis underscores the need for individualized treatment approaches and further research to refine these therapies in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
ADC histogram analysis of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cell levels in meningioma. Circumferential nerve wrapping with muscle autograft: a modified strategy of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Correlation of endoscopic third ventriculostomy with postoperative body temperature elevation: a single-center retrospective comparative study. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with deep venous drainage: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Microsurgical clipping remains a viable option for the treatment of coilable ruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms in the endovascular era.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1