Amanda Cyntia Lima Fonseca Rodrigues, Salem M Tos, Ahmed Shaaban, Georgios Mantziaris, Daniel M Trifiletti, Jason Sheehan
{"title":"Proton beam and carbon ion radiotherapy in skull base chordoma: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression with trial sequential analysis.","authors":"Amanda Cyntia Lima Fonseca Rodrigues, Salem M Tos, Ahmed Shaaban, Georgios Mantziaris, Daniel M Trifiletti, Jason Sheehan","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03117-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chordomas are rare, locally aggressive tumors that have a high rate of recurrence, especially at the skull base. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for skull base chordoma. We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Ovid up to November 26, 2023, following the PRISMA statement. Studies involving more than 10 patients with skull base chordoma treated with PBT or CIRT were included. The outcomes analyzed were local control, overall survival, progression-free survival, and toxicities. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method and the inverse variance method. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 1,145 patients (671 treated with PBT and 474 with CIRT). No significant difference was found between PBT and CIRT for 5-year local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). The only timepoint with a difference in local control was at 3 years, when PBT showed an advantage in local control (90% vs. 83% for CIRT; p = 0.05) and progression-free survival was similar (94% for PBT vs. 83% for CIRT; p = 0.09). Sensitivity analysis and meta-regression revealed no significant influence of predefined parameters on outcomes. Publication bias was suggested by asymmetrical funnel plots. Both PBT and CIRT are effective treatments for skull base chordoma, with comparable long-term efficacy. This meta-analysis underscores the need for individualized treatment approaches and further research to refine these therapies in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03117-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chordomas are rare, locally aggressive tumors that have a high rate of recurrence, especially at the skull base. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for skull base chordoma. We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Ovid up to November 26, 2023, following the PRISMA statement. Studies involving more than 10 patients with skull base chordoma treated with PBT or CIRT were included. The outcomes analyzed were local control, overall survival, progression-free survival, and toxicities. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method and the inverse variance method. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 1,145 patients (671 treated with PBT and 474 with CIRT). No significant difference was found between PBT and CIRT for 5-year local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). The only timepoint with a difference in local control was at 3 years, when PBT showed an advantage in local control (90% vs. 83% for CIRT; p = 0.05) and progression-free survival was similar (94% for PBT vs. 83% for CIRT; p = 0.09). Sensitivity analysis and meta-regression revealed no significant influence of predefined parameters on outcomes. Publication bias was suggested by asymmetrical funnel plots. Both PBT and CIRT are effective treatments for skull base chordoma, with comparable long-term efficacy. This meta-analysis underscores the need for individualized treatment approaches and further research to refine these therapies in clinical practice.
脊索瘤是一种罕见的局部侵袭性肿瘤,复发率高,尤其是在颅底。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在分析质子束治疗(PBT)和碳离子放疗(CIRT)治疗颅底脊索瘤的疗效和安全性。根据PRISMA的声明,我们对MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL、Web of Science和Ovid进行了系统检索,截止到2023年11月26日。我们纳入了10例以上颅底脊索瘤患者接受PBT或CIRT治疗的研究。分析的结果包括局部控制、总生存期、无进展生存期和毒性。meta分析采用Mantel-Haenszel法和反方差法。14项研究符合纳入标准,包括1145名患者(671名接受PBT治疗,474名接受CIRT治疗)。PBT和CIRT在5年局部控制(LC)和总生存(OS)方面无显著差异。唯一在局部控制方面存在差异的时间点是3年,PBT在局部控制方面表现出优势(90% vs. CIRT的83%;p = 0.05),无进展生存率相似(PBT为94%,CIRT为83%;p = 0.09)。敏感性分析和meta回归显示预定义参数对结果无显著影响。不对称漏斗图提示发表偏倚。PBT和CIRT都是颅底脊索瘤的有效治疗方法,长期疗效相当。这项荟萃分析强调了个体化治疗方法和进一步研究在临床实践中完善这些治疗方法的必要性。
期刊介绍:
The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.