Correlation of endoscopic third ventriculostomy with postoperative body temperature elevation: a single-center retrospective comparative study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1007/s10143-025-03190-0
Mohammed Issa, Clara Dannehl, Angelika Seitz, Pavlina Lenga, Steffen Syrbe, Sandro M Krieg, Ahmed El Damaty
{"title":"Correlation of endoscopic third ventriculostomy with postoperative body temperature elevation: a single-center retrospective comparative study.","authors":"Mohammed Issa, Clara Dannehl, Angelika Seitz, Pavlina Lenga, Steffen Syrbe, Sandro M Krieg, Ahmed El Damaty","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03190-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative fever following neuroendoscopic procedures has been well-documented, yet specific differentiation based on the nature and site of the procedure remains lacking. Given the anatomical involvement of the hypothalamus in temperature regulation, we propose that endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) may have a distinct impact on postoperative fever. This study aims to investigate this phenomenon. This retrospective comparative analysis includes all patients who underwent neuroendoscopic procedures between January 2017 and September 2023. Patients were divided into ETV and non-ETV groups, and comparisons were made regarding postoperative body temperature during the initial 7 days after surgery. Comprehensive data were collected on case numbers, surgical duration, symptoms, treatments, and outcomes. Body temperature was measured postoperatively in the morning and evening for 7 days, with elevated temperature categorized as sub-fever (37.5 to 38.2 °C) and fever (≥ 38.3 °C). 207 patients underwent neuroendoscopic procedures in our neurosurgical centers (median age19.1 ± 21.7 years, 50.7% male), primarily for aqueduct stenosis (25.6%) and intra- and periventricular tumors (25.1%). Among them, 104 (50.2%) patients underwent ETV, while 103 (49.8%) underwent other neuroendoscopic procedures (43.7% intracranial cysts fenestrations, 39.8% placement of intraventricular catheters, 3.9% intraventricular lavage, 4.9% septostomy, and 5.8% tumor biopsy). All postoperative infections were excluded. No significant differences were observed in preoperative symptoms, laboratory findings, or postoperative antibiotic usage between the two groups. The ETV group exhibited significantly more postoperative fever (37.5% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.005), particularly from the first night to the third night after the operation. This study substantiates the hypothesis that manipulation of the floor of third ventricle through endoscopic ventriculostomy may contribute to postoperative fever, rather than the neuroendoscopic procedure. Elevated temperatures were observable from the first night post-surgery and typically normalized by third day without necessitating specific treatment. Further prospective studies are warranted to elucidate the precise mechanisms underlying intraoperative manipulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03190-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postoperative fever following neuroendoscopic procedures has been well-documented, yet specific differentiation based on the nature and site of the procedure remains lacking. Given the anatomical involvement of the hypothalamus in temperature regulation, we propose that endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) may have a distinct impact on postoperative fever. This study aims to investigate this phenomenon. This retrospective comparative analysis includes all patients who underwent neuroendoscopic procedures between January 2017 and September 2023. Patients were divided into ETV and non-ETV groups, and comparisons were made regarding postoperative body temperature during the initial 7 days after surgery. Comprehensive data were collected on case numbers, surgical duration, symptoms, treatments, and outcomes. Body temperature was measured postoperatively in the morning and evening for 7 days, with elevated temperature categorized as sub-fever (37.5 to 38.2 °C) and fever (≥ 38.3 °C). 207 patients underwent neuroendoscopic procedures in our neurosurgical centers (median age19.1 ± 21.7 years, 50.7% male), primarily for aqueduct stenosis (25.6%) and intra- and periventricular tumors (25.1%). Among them, 104 (50.2%) patients underwent ETV, while 103 (49.8%) underwent other neuroendoscopic procedures (43.7% intracranial cysts fenestrations, 39.8% placement of intraventricular catheters, 3.9% intraventricular lavage, 4.9% septostomy, and 5.8% tumor biopsy). All postoperative infections were excluded. No significant differences were observed in preoperative symptoms, laboratory findings, or postoperative antibiotic usage between the two groups. The ETV group exhibited significantly more postoperative fever (37.5% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.005), particularly from the first night to the third night after the operation. This study substantiates the hypothesis that manipulation of the floor of third ventricle through endoscopic ventriculostomy may contribute to postoperative fever, rather than the neuroendoscopic procedure. Elevated temperatures were observable from the first night post-surgery and typically normalized by third day without necessitating specific treatment. Further prospective studies are warranted to elucidate the precise mechanisms underlying intraoperative manipulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜下第三脑室造瘘术与术后体温升高的相关性:单中心回顾性比较研究。
神经内窥镜手术后的术后发热已被充分记录,但基于手术性质和部位的具体区分仍然缺乏。考虑到下丘脑参与温度调节的解剖结构,我们认为内镜下第三脑室造口术(ETV)可能对术后发热有明显的影响。本研究旨在调查这一现象。这项回顾性比较分析包括2017年1月至2023年9月期间接受神经内窥镜手术的所有患者。将患者分为ETV组和非ETV组,比较术后最初7天的体温。收集了病例数、手术时间、症状、治疗和结果的综合数据。术后早晚测体温,持续7 d,体温升高分为亚热(37.5 ~ 38.2℃)和发热(≥38.3℃)。207例患者在我们的神经外科中心接受了神经内窥镜手术(中位年龄19.1±21.7岁,50.7%为男性),主要治疗导水管狭窄(25.6%)和脑室内和脑室周围肿瘤(25.1%)。其中104例(50.2%)患者接受了ETV, 103例(49.8%)患者接受了其他神经内镜手术(43.7%颅内囊肿开窗,39.8%放置脑室导管,3.9%脑室灌洗,4.9%鼻中隔造口,5.8%肿瘤活检)。排除所有术后感染。两组患者术前症状、实验室检查结果或术后抗生素使用均无显著差异。ETV组术后发热明显增加(37.5% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.005),尤其是术后第1晚至第3晚。本研究证实了通过内窥镜脑室造口术操作第三脑室底可能导致术后发热的假设,而不是神经内窥镜手术。术后第一天晚上可观察到体温升高,通常在第三天恢复正常,无需特殊治疗。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来阐明术中操作的确切机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Performance of Radiomics-based machine learning and deep learning-based methods in the prediction of tumor grade in meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Research progress of early brain Injury in subarachnoid hemorrhage from 2004 to 2024: a bibliometric analysis. Risk factors of posthemorrhagic seizure in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Delirium after deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of incidence and risk factors. Parkinson's disease and deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS): long-term disease evaluation and neuropsychological outcomes in a 9-year matched-controlled study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1