Epidemiology and outcomes of severe injury patients related to suicide attempt or self-harm in Korea: Nationwide community-based study, 2016–2020

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2024.112032
Sun Young Lee , Kyoung Jun Song , Ki Jeong Hong , Jeong Ho Park , Tae Han Kim , Joo Jeong , Seul Ki Choi , Young Ho Choi
{"title":"Epidemiology and outcomes of severe injury patients related to suicide attempt or self-harm in Korea: Nationwide community-based study, 2016–2020","authors":"Sun Young Lee ,&nbsp;Kyoung Jun Song ,&nbsp;Ki Jeong Hong ,&nbsp;Jeong Ho Park ,&nbsp;Tae Han Kim ,&nbsp;Joo Jeong ,&nbsp;Seul Ki Choi ,&nbsp;Young Ho Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.112032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Suicide is a major social issue in Korea. Suicide attempt or self-harm (SA/SH)—a risk factor for suicides—is in itself a major public health problem. Investigating vulnerable populations is the first step for designing an effective prevention program. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology and outcomes of patients with severe injuries related to suicide attempts or self-harm (SA/SH) by age groups, using a nationwide database.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective observational study was conducted in Korea between 2016 and 2020. Its participants were patients with severe injuries, who were treated by emergency medical service (EMS). From among injured patients who met the criteria for a field-based injury triage scheme or had a prehospital physiological abnormality, those with SA/SH were included. Exposure was based on age groups: adolescents (10–18 years), adults (19–64 years), and older adults (≥65 years). The study's outcomes were in-hospital mortality. Patients’ characteristics and outcomes were compared by age groups and SA/SH mechanisms. Predictors of mortality were investigated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 204,211 patients with severe injuries transferred by EMS, 43,945 (21.5 %) were SA/SH-related. Their median (interquartile) age was 48 (35–61) years, and 52.9 % were female patients. The common SA/SH mechanisms were: poisoning (67.6 %), hanging (16.3 %), and jumping (8.1 %). Overall, the mortality was 21.9 %, but it was higher for hanging (69.2 %) and jumping (62.0 %), than for common poisoning (6.5 %). Among adolescents, poisoning (46.1 %), followed by jumping (34.0 %) was common, and the mortality was 23.3 %. In the older adults, poisoning (68.6 %), followed by hanging (20.2 %) was common, and the mortality was 34.9 %. Older adults compared to adults, males compared to females, and hanging and jumping compared to poisoning, were associated with higher mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>More than 20 % of EMS treated patients with severe injury were SA/SH-related, and the mortality was over 20 %. Although poisoning was the most common mechanism, the high proportions of jumping and hanging with high mortality, resulted in adolescents and the older adults groups having high mortality. Therefore, designing target-specific SA/SH prevention programs based on age, sex, and common SA/SH mechanisms are necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 2","pages":"Article 112032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324007769","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Suicide is a major social issue in Korea. Suicide attempt or self-harm (SA/SH)—a risk factor for suicides—is in itself a major public health problem. Investigating vulnerable populations is the first step for designing an effective prevention program. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology and outcomes of patients with severe injuries related to suicide attempts or self-harm (SA/SH) by age groups, using a nationwide database.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective observational study was conducted in Korea between 2016 and 2020. Its participants were patients with severe injuries, who were treated by emergency medical service (EMS). From among injured patients who met the criteria for a field-based injury triage scheme or had a prehospital physiological abnormality, those with SA/SH were included. Exposure was based on age groups: adolescents (10–18 years), adults (19–64 years), and older adults (≥65 years). The study's outcomes were in-hospital mortality. Patients’ characteristics and outcomes were compared by age groups and SA/SH mechanisms. Predictors of mortality were investigated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

Among the 204,211 patients with severe injuries transferred by EMS, 43,945 (21.5 %) were SA/SH-related. Their median (interquartile) age was 48 (35–61) years, and 52.9 % were female patients. The common SA/SH mechanisms were: poisoning (67.6 %), hanging (16.3 %), and jumping (8.1 %). Overall, the mortality was 21.9 %, but it was higher for hanging (69.2 %) and jumping (62.0 %), than for common poisoning (6.5 %). Among adolescents, poisoning (46.1 %), followed by jumping (34.0 %) was common, and the mortality was 23.3 %. In the older adults, poisoning (68.6 %), followed by hanging (20.2 %) was common, and the mortality was 34.9 %. Older adults compared to adults, males compared to females, and hanging and jumping compared to poisoning, were associated with higher mortality.

Conclusions

More than 20 % of EMS treated patients with severe injury were SA/SH-related, and the mortality was over 20 %. Although poisoning was the most common mechanism, the high proportions of jumping and hanging with high mortality, resulted in adolescents and the older adults groups having high mortality. Therefore, designing target-specific SA/SH prevention programs based on age, sex, and common SA/SH mechanisms are necessary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国重伤患者自杀或自残相关的流行病学和结果:2016-2020年全国社区研究
在韩国,自杀是一个重大的社会问题。自杀企图或自残(SA/SH)是自杀的一个危险因素,它本身就是一个主要的公共卫生问题。调查弱势群体是设计有效预防方案的第一步。本研究旨在使用全国数据库,按年龄组调查与自杀或自残相关的严重伤害患者(SA/SH)的流行病学和结果。材料和方法:本回顾性观察性研究于2016年至2020年在韩国进行。其参与者是严重受伤的病人,他们接受紧急医疗服务(EMS)的治疗。从符合现场损伤分诊方案标准或院前生理异常的受伤患者中,包括SA/SH患者。暴露基于年龄组:青少年(10-18岁)、成人(19-64岁)和老年人(≥65岁)。这项研究的结果是住院死亡率。按年龄组和SA/SH机制比较患者的特征和结局。使用多变量logistic回归分析对死亡率的预测因素进行调查。结果:EMS转送的204,211例重症患者中,有43,945例(21.5%)为SA/ sh相关。他们的中位(四分位数)年龄为48岁(35-61岁),52.9%为女性患者。常见的SA/SH机制为:中毒(67.6%)、吊死(16.3%)和跳死(8.1%)。总体死亡率为21.9%,但上吊(69.2%)和跳楼(62.0%)高于普通中毒(6.5%)。青少年以中毒(46.1%)、跳高(34.0%)居多,死亡率为23.3%。老年人以中毒(68.6%)居多,其次为上吊(20.2%),死亡率为34.9%。老年人与成年人相比,男性与女性相比,上吊和跳高与中毒相比,死亡率更高。结论:EMS治疗的重症外伤患者中有20%以上与SA/ sh相关,死亡率超过20%。虽然中毒是最常见的机制,但跳吊比例高,死亡率高,导致青少年和老年人群体死亡率高。因此,有必要根据年龄、性别和常见的SA/SH机制设计针对特定目标的SA/SH预防方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Modeling, experiment, and validation of a piglet head Epidemiology and outcomes of severe injury patients related to suicide attempt or self-harm in Korea: Nationwide community-based study, 2016–2020 Nanosphere hydrogel-mediated delivery of miR-34a-5p improves achilles tendon function in rat model Pelvic fractures and thoracolumbar spine injury: A critical overlook in high-impact vehicular trauma management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1