Comparison of robustness, resilience and intrinsic capacity including prediction of long-term adverse health outcomes: The KORA-Age study.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100433
Michaela Rippl, Marie-Theres Huemer, Lars Schwettmann, Eva Grill, Annette Peters, Michael Drey, Barbara Thorand
{"title":"Comparison of robustness, resilience and intrinsic capacity including prediction of long-term adverse health outcomes: The KORA-Age study.","authors":"Michaela Rippl, Marie-Theres Huemer, Lars Schwettmann, Eva Grill, Annette Peters, Michael Drey, Barbara Thorand","doi":"10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty, resilience and intrinsic capacity (IC) are concepts to evaluate older person`s health status, but no comparison of their associations with adverse health outcomes exists. We therefore aimed to assess which concept is most useful for determining long-term health of older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses were based on the KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg)-Age study (n = 940, 65-93 years). Frailty was evaluated using the physical frailty-phenotype by Fried et al. For comparability to resilience and IC, we chose the protective concept of robustness instead of frailty in the present analysis. Resilience was measured by the 11-item resilience-scale. The IC-score was based on 4 domains (locomotion, cognition, vitality and psychiatric capacities). Associations with falls, disability, and hospitalization at 3-year and 7-year follow-up and with mortality were evaluated by multivariable adjusted logistic and Cox regression. Concept overlaps were illustrated by a Venn-diagram.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the fully adjusted models, robustness showed significant inverse associations with most outcomes (3-year follow-up: OR (95%CI): disability 0.448 (0.300-0.668), 7-year follow-up: falls 0.477 (0.298-0.764), hospitalization 0.547 (0.349-0.856), and all-cause mortality 0.649 (0.460-0.915)) while resilience and IC showed significant inverse associations with disability only (e.g., 7-year-follow-up: resilience: 0.467 (0.304-0.716), IC: 0.510 (0.329-0.793)). 23% of the participants met the criteria for both robustness and IC while 22% met those for robustness and resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robustness was the most useful concept, showing the strongest protective associations for most adverse health outcomes. IC and resilience showed their main strengths in capturing protective associations for disabilities. Robustness overlapped with resilience and IC, supporting the concept of mind-body-interaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":54778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging","volume":"29 1","pages":"100433"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty, resilience and intrinsic capacity (IC) are concepts to evaluate older person`s health status, but no comparison of their associations with adverse health outcomes exists. We therefore aimed to assess which concept is most useful for determining long-term health of older adults.

Methods: Analyses were based on the KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg)-Age study (n = 940, 65-93 years). Frailty was evaluated using the physical frailty-phenotype by Fried et al. For comparability to resilience and IC, we chose the protective concept of robustness instead of frailty in the present analysis. Resilience was measured by the 11-item resilience-scale. The IC-score was based on 4 domains (locomotion, cognition, vitality and psychiatric capacities). Associations with falls, disability, and hospitalization at 3-year and 7-year follow-up and with mortality were evaluated by multivariable adjusted logistic and Cox regression. Concept overlaps were illustrated by a Venn-diagram.

Results: In the fully adjusted models, robustness showed significant inverse associations with most outcomes (3-year follow-up: OR (95%CI): disability 0.448 (0.300-0.668), 7-year follow-up: falls 0.477 (0.298-0.764), hospitalization 0.547 (0.349-0.856), and all-cause mortality 0.649 (0.460-0.915)) while resilience and IC showed significant inverse associations with disability only (e.g., 7-year-follow-up: resilience: 0.467 (0.304-0.716), IC: 0.510 (0.329-0.793)). 23% of the participants met the criteria for both robustness and IC while 22% met those for robustness and resilience.

Conclusion: Robustness was the most useful concept, showing the strongest protective associations for most adverse health outcomes. IC and resilience showed their main strengths in capturing protective associations for disabilities. Robustness overlapped with resilience and IC, supporting the concept of mind-body-interaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
稳健性、弹性和内在能力的比较,包括对长期不良健康结果的预测:KORA-Age研究
背景:虚弱、恢复力和内在能力(IC)是评估老年人健康状况的概念,但没有比较它们与不良健康结果的关系。因此,我们旨在评估哪种概念对确定老年人的长期健康状况最有用。方法:分析基于奥格斯堡地区合作卫生研究(KORA)-年龄研究(n = 940, 65-93岁)。弗里德等人使用生理脆弱表型来评估脆弱性。为了与弹性和集成电路的可比性,我们在本分析中选择了鲁棒性的保护概念而不是脆弱性。弹性是通过11项弹性量表来衡量的。ic评分基于4个领域(运动、认知、活力和精神能力)。通过多变量调整logistic和Cox回归评估3年和7年随访时跌倒、残疾、住院以及死亡率的相关性。概念重叠用维恩图表示。结果:在完全调整后的模型中,稳健性与大多数结果呈显著负相关(3年随访:OR (95%CI):残疾0.448(0.300-0.668),7年随访:跌倒0.477(0.298-0.764),住院0.547(0.349-0.856),全因死亡率0.649(0.460-0.915)),而韧性和IC仅与残疾呈显著负相关(例如,7年随访:韧性:0.467 (0.304-0.716),IC: 0.510(0.329-0.793))。23%的参与者满足稳健性和IC的标准,而22%的参与者满足稳健性和弹性的标准。结论:稳健性是最有用的概念,显示了对大多数不良健康结果的最强保护关联。IC和复原力在捕捉残疾保护性关联方面显示出它们的主要优势。鲁棒性与弹性和IC重叠,支持身心相互作用的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: There is increasing scientific and clinical interest in the interactions of nutrition and health as part of the aging process. This interest is due to the important role that nutrition plays throughout the life span. This role affects the growth and development of the body during childhood, affects the risk of acute and chronic diseases, the maintenance of physiological processes and the biological process of aging. A major aim of "The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging" is to contribute to the improvement of knowledge regarding the relationships between nutrition and the aging process from birth to old age.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor on: The impact of dietary acid load on super-agers with exceptional cognitive abilities: A propensity score analysis of national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES) 2011-2014. Pauca verba on the association between protein intake and sarcopenia in older adults. Association between cardiometabolic multimorbidity, body roundness index, and frailty index in Chinese middle-aged and older adults. Differential effects of short-term and long-term ketogenic diet on gene expression in the aging mouse brain. Impact of diabetes on the progression of Alzheimer's disease via trajectories of amyloid-tau-neurodegeneration (ATN) biomarkers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1