Shilpee Sinha MD, FACP, FAAHPM , Shannon Countryman MBA-HM, RN, CHPN , Ami Patel MD , Chelsea Powell RN, CHPN , James E. Slaven MS, MA , Amber R. Comer PhD, JD , Alexia M. Torke MD, MS
{"title":"Implementing Goals of Care Notes in a Statewide Health System: A Quality Improvement Initiative","authors":"Shilpee Sinha MD, FACP, FAAHPM , Shannon Countryman MBA-HM, RN, CHPN , Ami Patel MD , Chelsea Powell RN, CHPN , James E. Slaven MS, MA , Amber R. Comer PhD, JD , Alexia M. Torke MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.11.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Goals of care (GOC) documentation for seriously ill patients is integral to patient-centered care but not standardized. Collaborative efforts within the health system to improve the frequency and documentation of GOC to communicate patient preferences and values are essential to ensure both quality of life and quality of death.</div></div><div><h3>Measures</h3><div>We created a standard GOC note type and location in the electronic medical record for a large, statewide health system in the Midwest. Utilization and note content for all unique GOC note types documented in the first year were reviewed. A framework of GOC topics including treatment plan, prognosis, patient preferences and values, and quality of life was used to review the note content. Demographic data and outcomes including death during the observation period and hospice enrollment were also collected.</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><div>In the first year, 934 GOC notes were documented. Palliative care (PC) clinicians addressed more GOC fields compared to other clinicians (70% vs 31%, <em>P</em> < .0001) and had earlier discussions (median 19 days before death vs 4 days, <em>P</em> < .0001). Hospice was discussed more by PC (50% vs 27%, <em>P</em> = .0001) and PC discussions were followed by higher hospice enrollments before death (50% vs 35% <em>P</em> = .0166).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We successfully implemented a standard electronic medical record location for GOC notes which improved GOC documentation across a state healthcare system and found variations and gaps in fields addressed by all clinicians as well as key differences between PC clinicians vs other clinicians.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":"138 5","pages":"Pages 782-788"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002934324007861","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Goals of care (GOC) documentation for seriously ill patients is integral to patient-centered care but not standardized. Collaborative efforts within the health system to improve the frequency and documentation of GOC to communicate patient preferences and values are essential to ensure both quality of life and quality of death.
Measures
We created a standard GOC note type and location in the electronic medical record for a large, statewide health system in the Midwest. Utilization and note content for all unique GOC note types documented in the first year were reviewed. A framework of GOC topics including treatment plan, prognosis, patient preferences and values, and quality of life was used to review the note content. Demographic data and outcomes including death during the observation period and hospice enrollment were also collected.
Outcomes
In the first year, 934 GOC notes were documented. Palliative care (PC) clinicians addressed more GOC fields compared to other clinicians (70% vs 31%, P < .0001) and had earlier discussions (median 19 days before death vs 4 days, P < .0001). Hospice was discussed more by PC (50% vs 27%, P = .0001) and PC discussions were followed by higher hospice enrollments before death (50% vs 35% P = .0166).
Conclusions
We successfully implemented a standard electronic medical record location for GOC notes which improved GOC documentation across a state healthcare system and found variations and gaps in fields addressed by all clinicians as well as key differences between PC clinicians vs other clinicians.
背景:重症患者的护理目标(GOC)文件是以患者为中心的护理不可或缺的一部分,但尚未标准化。卫生系统内的合作努力,提高GOC的频率和记录,以传达患者的偏好和价值观,对于确保生活质量和死亡质量至关重要。措施:我们为中西部的一个大型全州卫生系统在电子医疗记录(EMR)中创建了一个标准的GOC注释类型和位置。对第一年记录的所有独特GOC注释类型的使用情况和注释内容进行了审查。使用GOC主题框架,包括治疗计划、预后、患者偏好和价值观以及生活质量来审查笔记内容。人口统计数据和结果包括观察期间的死亡和临终关怀登记也被收集。结果:在第一年,记录了934份GOC笔记。与其他临床医生相比,姑息治疗(PC)临床医生处理的GOC领域更多(70% vs . 31%, p)。结论:我们成功实施了GOC笔记的标准电子病历定位,改善了整个州医疗保健系统的GOC文档,并发现了所有临床医生处理领域的差异和差距,以及PC临床医生与其他临床医生之间的关键差异。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.