Implementation of the mini-CEX in a paediatric emergency department.

Anales de pediatria Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.anpede.2024.11.005
Iris Alonso Sánchez, Sandra Morán Moya, Gemma Claret Teruel, Roser Garrido Romero, David Muñoz Santanach, Victoria Trenchs Sainz de la Maza, Carles Luaces Cubells
{"title":"Implementation of the mini-CEX in a paediatric emergency department.","authors":"Iris Alonso Sánchez, Sandra Morán Moya, Gemma Claret Teruel, Roser Garrido Romero, David Muñoz Santanach, Victoria Trenchs Sainz de la Maza, Carles Luaces Cubells","doi":"10.1016/j.anpede.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The mini-CEX is a direct observation of care delivery that provides feedback to the medical resident; and previous studies have confirmed its validity, reliability, feasibility and user satisfaction. Its application in the paediatric emergency care setting is scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess trends in the acquisition of emergency care skills in paediatrics residents through the mini-CEX and determine the satisfaction of participants after its implementation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Inclusion criteria: paediatrics residents in the first (MIR1) and second (MIR2) year of residency.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>emergency department.</p><p><strong>Study period: </strong>4 years (May 2019-May 2023). Evaluated competencies: anamnesis, physical examination, professionalism, clinical judgment, communication, organization-efficiency and global assessment. Number of evaluations: maximum of 6 per resident per year; each evaluation assessed 2-3 competencies (each competency could be evaluated twice per year). The evaluators were adjunct physicians in the emergency department; medical residents were assessed for training purposes. Satisfaction was rated on a scale from 1 to 9.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 217 evaluations were performed on 54 residents (1-9 per resident). The median observation time was 16 min per visit (IQR, 14-25) and the feedback time was 10 min per visit (IQR, 7-15). The median anamnesis, physical examination, clinical judgment, organization-efficacy and global scores were 7 for MR1 and 8 for MRI2 residents (P = .015; P = .001, P = .076, P = .009 and P = .010, respectively). We did not find significant differences in the remaining competencies. The average satisfaction score was 9 for both evaluators and residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The acquisition of skills was high; with favourable outcomes observed in MRI2 relative to MRI1. The implementation of the mini-CEX was well accepted among the involved professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":93868,"journal":{"name":"Anales de pediatria","volume":" ","pages":"388-392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpede.2024.11.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The mini-CEX is a direct observation of care delivery that provides feedback to the medical resident; and previous studies have confirmed its validity, reliability, feasibility and user satisfaction. Its application in the paediatric emergency care setting is scarce.

Objective: To assess trends in the acquisition of emergency care skills in paediatrics residents through the mini-CEX and determine the satisfaction of participants after its implementation.

Material and methods: Inclusion criteria: paediatrics residents in the first (MIR1) and second (MIR2) year of residency.

Setting: emergency department.

Study period: 4 years (May 2019-May 2023). Evaluated competencies: anamnesis, physical examination, professionalism, clinical judgment, communication, organization-efficiency and global assessment. Number of evaluations: maximum of 6 per resident per year; each evaluation assessed 2-3 competencies (each competency could be evaluated twice per year). The evaluators were adjunct physicians in the emergency department; medical residents were assessed for training purposes. Satisfaction was rated on a scale from 1 to 9.

Results: A total of 217 evaluations were performed on 54 residents (1-9 per resident). The median observation time was 16 min per visit (IQR, 14-25) and the feedback time was 10 min per visit (IQR, 7-15). The median anamnesis, physical examination, clinical judgment, organization-efficacy and global scores were 7 for MR1 and 8 for MRI2 residents (P = .015; P = .001, P = .076, P = .009 and P = .010, respectively). We did not find significant differences in the remaining competencies. The average satisfaction score was 9 for both evaluators and residents.

Conclusions: The acquisition of skills was high; with favourable outcomes observed in MRI2 relative to MRI1. The implementation of the mini-CEX was well accepted among the involved professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Neutrophil CD64 expression increases in infants aged less than 3 months with fever without source: pilot study in the paediatric emergency care setting. Physical, social, and emotional impact on patients with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac catheterization. If triage works, the ED works. Oral blistering mucositis in adolescent. Metabolopathy with characteristic clinical triad: Sengers syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1