Local and systemic reactogenicity after mRNA and protein-based COVID-19 vaccines compared to meningococcal vaccine (MenACWY) in a UK blinded, randomized phase 2 trial (COV-BOOST)

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Vaccine Pub Date : 2025-01-12 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126569
Anthony M. Marchese , Hadi Beyhaghi , Matthew D. Rousculp , Vivian Huang , Xinxue Liu , Seth Toback , Saul N. Faust
{"title":"Local and systemic reactogenicity after mRNA and protein-based COVID-19 vaccines compared to meningococcal vaccine (MenACWY) in a UK blinded, randomized phase 2 trial (COV-BOOST)","authors":"Anthony M. Marchese ,&nbsp;Hadi Beyhaghi ,&nbsp;Matthew D. Rousculp ,&nbsp;Vivian Huang ,&nbsp;Xinxue Liu ,&nbsp;Seth Toback ,&nbsp;Saul N. Faust","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reactogenicity, the occurrence of vaccine side effects, can impact vaccine acceptance. There is limited data comparing the reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines to other routinely used vaccines, such as the meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY). In a trial of UK adults, participants received a third COVID-19 vaccine dose (NVX-CoV2373, BNT162b2, or mRNA1273) alongside MenACWY as an active control. Compared to MenACWY, we found that mRNA vaccines, particularly mRNA1273, showed the greatest relative increase in side effects, while protein-based NVX-CoV2373 generally elicited similar reactogenicity to MenACWY. These findings suggest that platform type can influence vaccine reactogenicity, and further research is needed to compare COVID-19 vaccines with other routinely administered vaccines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 126569"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24012519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reactogenicity, the occurrence of vaccine side effects, can impact vaccine acceptance. There is limited data comparing the reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines to other routinely used vaccines, such as the meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY). In a trial of UK adults, participants received a third COVID-19 vaccine dose (NVX-CoV2373, BNT162b2, or mRNA1273) alongside MenACWY as an active control. Compared to MenACWY, we found that mRNA vaccines, particularly mRNA1273, showed the greatest relative increase in side effects, while protein-based NVX-CoV2373 generally elicited similar reactogenicity to MenACWY. These findings suggest that platform type can influence vaccine reactogenicity, and further research is needed to compare COVID-19 vaccines with other routinely administered vaccines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在英国一项盲法、随机2期试验(COV-BOOST)中,与脑膜炎球菌疫苗(MenACWY)相比,基于mRNA和蛋白质的COVID-19疫苗的局部和全身反应性。
反应原性,即疫苗副作用的发生,会影响疫苗的接受。将COVID-19疫苗与其他常规使用的疫苗(如脑膜炎球菌结合疫苗(MenACWY))的反应原性进行比较的数据有限。在一项针对英国成年人的试验中,参与者接受了第三剂COVID-19疫苗(NVX-CoV2373、BNT162b2或mRNA1273)和MenACWY作为主动对照。与MenACWY相比,我们发现mRNA疫苗,特别是mRNA1273,副作用的相对增加最大,而基于蛋白质的NVX-CoV2373通常引起与MenACWY相似的反应性。这些发现表明,平台类型会影响疫苗的反应原性,需要进一步研究将COVID-19疫苗与其他常规接种疫苗进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
期刊最新文献
Enhanced passive safety surveillance during the first use of the meningococcal vaccine A/C/W/Y/X conjugate for outbreak response in Niger and Nigeria Senescent Cancer cell-derived vaccines: Current Progress, immunological challenges, and translational perspectives RSV vaccination uptake by the end of the 2024–25 respiratory virus season among adults aged 60–74 years at increased risk of severe RSV and adults aged ≥75 years Glycoprotein-specific transcriptional response contributes to differential vaccine protection against lethal Ebola virus infection Synthetic TRAC478 emulsion and saponin based adjuvant systems enhance humoral and cellular immune responses elicited by computationally optimized H1 and H3 hemagglutinin subunit vaccines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1