Is the shift in treatment patterns towards new, more expensive drugs still driving the increase in pharmaceutical expenditure? A decomposition analysis of expenditure data in Sweden 1990-2022.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1080/14737167.2024.2439482
Marie-Catherine Schaller, Ulf-G Gerdtham, Johan Jarl
{"title":"Is the shift in treatment patterns towards new, more expensive drugs still driving the increase in pharmaceutical expenditure? A decomposition analysis of expenditure data in Sweden 1990-2022.","authors":"Marie-Catherine Schaller, Ulf-G Gerdtham, Johan Jarl","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2439482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmaceutical expenditures (PE) are increasing worldwide, raising concerns about sustainability. However, the current price index provides an incomplete picture of this trend due to the rapid introduction of new drugs on the market.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to decompose PE into their components and investigate the development in Sweden from 1990 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PE index was broken down into separate indices for price, quantity, and a residual. The residual reflects changes in expenditure driven by shifts in drug treatment patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PE increased by 227% during the study period. The decomposition showed that this increase was mainly driven by the residual (215%). Drug quantity increased by 105%, while the relative prices decreased by 50%. When dividing the whole study period into three 11-year-subperiods, the increase in real drug expenditure, drug quantity, and the residual was the highest from 1990 to 2000.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The finding that the residual is the main driver indicates that the increase in PE is due to the introduction of and shift to more expensive pharmaceutical treatments, while existing treatments tend to become cheaper. Further research is needed to determine whether newer, more expensive drugs are indeed worth the extra cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2439482","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pharmaceutical expenditures (PE) are increasing worldwide, raising concerns about sustainability. However, the current price index provides an incomplete picture of this trend due to the rapid introduction of new drugs on the market.

Objective: The aim of this study is to decompose PE into their components and investigate the development in Sweden from 1990 to 2022.

Methods: The PE index was broken down into separate indices for price, quantity, and a residual. The residual reflects changes in expenditure driven by shifts in drug treatment patterns.

Results: PE increased by 227% during the study period. The decomposition showed that this increase was mainly driven by the residual (215%). Drug quantity increased by 105%, while the relative prices decreased by 50%. When dividing the whole study period into three 11-year-subperiods, the increase in real drug expenditure, drug quantity, and the residual was the highest from 1990 to 2000.

Conclusions: The finding that the residual is the main driver indicates that the increase in PE is due to the introduction of and shift to more expensive pharmaceutical treatments, while existing treatments tend to become cheaper. Further research is needed to determine whether newer, more expensive drugs are indeed worth the extra cost.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗模式转向新的、更昂贵的药物是否仍在推动药品支出的增加?1990-2022年瑞典支出数据的分解分析。
背景:世界范围内药品支出(PE)不断增加,引起了人们对可持续性的关注。然而,由于新药在市场上的迅速推出,目前的价格指数不能完全反映这一趋势。目的:本研究的目的是将PE分解成其组成部分,并调查瑞典1990年至2022年的发展情况。方法:将PE指数分为价格指数、数量指数和残差指数。剩余部分反映了药物治疗模式转变导致的支出变化。结果:在研究期间,PE增加了227%。分解表明,这一增长主要是由残差(215%)驱动的。药品数量增长105%,相对价格下降50%。将整个研究期划分为3个11年亚期,1990 - 2000年实际药品支出、药品数量和剩余量的增幅最大。结论:残差是主要驱动因素的发现表明,PE的增加是由于引入和转向更昂贵的药物治疗,而现有治疗往往变得更便宜。需要进一步的研究来确定更新、更昂贵的药物是否真的值得付出额外的代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
期刊最新文献
How do we approach integrating digital endpoint studies into health technology assessment? Cost-effectiveness analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) for response prediction of neoadjuvant radio(chemo)therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in the Netherlands. Cost-utility of pre-emptive plerixafor versus rescue plerixafor in the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in multiple myeloma. Cost of rimegepant and lasmiditan associated adverse events, for acute treatment in migraine in Spain. Real-world healthcare resource utilization and medical costs in patients with overweight or obesity and multimorbidity treated with semaglutide in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1