Psychometric properties of the Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale in depressed youth.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2024.12.018
Dylan Hammond, Sue Cotton, Simon Rice, Sarah E Hetrick, Paul Amminger, Olivia Dean, Seetal Dodd, Patrick McGorry, Andrew M Chanen, Christopher G Davey, Michael Berk, Aswin Ratheesh
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale in depressed youth.","authors":"Dylan Hammond, Sue Cotton, Simon Rice, Sarah E Hetrick, Paul Amminger, Olivia Dean, Seetal Dodd, Patrick McGorry, Andrew M Chanen, Christopher G Davey, Michael Berk, Aswin Ratheesh","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2024.12.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Youth with depression may be at a higher risk of developing bipolar disorder (BD). Self-reported, dimensional measures, like the Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale (BSDS), aim to assess for BD in these groups. We explored properties of this instrument within a cohort of depressed, help-seeking youth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used baseline data from two randomized controlled trials for depressed youth (aged 15-25 years) who had no history of BD or psychosis and who completed the BSDS (n = 240; mean Age = 19.9 years, SD = 2.7; Female = 57 %). Structured diagnostic assessments were repeated at 26-weeks to detect new-onset BD. We examined false-positive rates for concurrent BD using established thresholds on the BSDS, utilised factor analyses to determine its underlying structure, and explored associations between the BSDS and demographic, clinical, and personality variables using linear regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>False-positives rates were high. Most (60 %) participants scored above BSDS thresholds at baseline, though none developed BD over the 26-week study period. A three-factor model best fit BSDS items, representing depression, mania, and lability factors. BSDS total, mania and lability sub-scale scores were associated with similar characteristics, with a different pattern of association for the BSDS depression subscale.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>With no long-term follow-up of the current sample nor a separate bipolar youth sample, we were unable to determine the overall discriminant validity, sensitivity, or longer-term predictive validity of the BSDS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At recommended thresholds, BSDS has high false positive rates for detecting current BD in youth with moderate to severe depression, especially with mental state or personality disorder comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"347-355"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.12.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Youth with depression may be at a higher risk of developing bipolar disorder (BD). Self-reported, dimensional measures, like the Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale (BSDS), aim to assess for BD in these groups. We explored properties of this instrument within a cohort of depressed, help-seeking youth.

Methods: We used baseline data from two randomized controlled trials for depressed youth (aged 15-25 years) who had no history of BD or psychosis and who completed the BSDS (n = 240; mean Age = 19.9 years, SD = 2.7; Female = 57 %). Structured diagnostic assessments were repeated at 26-weeks to detect new-onset BD. We examined false-positive rates for concurrent BD using established thresholds on the BSDS, utilised factor analyses to determine its underlying structure, and explored associations between the BSDS and demographic, clinical, and personality variables using linear regressions.

Results: False-positives rates were high. Most (60 %) participants scored above BSDS thresholds at baseline, though none developed BD over the 26-week study period. A three-factor model best fit BSDS items, representing depression, mania, and lability factors. BSDS total, mania and lability sub-scale scores were associated with similar characteristics, with a different pattern of association for the BSDS depression subscale.

Limitations: With no long-term follow-up of the current sample nor a separate bipolar youth sample, we were unable to determine the overall discriminant validity, sensitivity, or longer-term predictive validity of the BSDS.

Conclusion: At recommended thresholds, BSDS has high false positive rates for detecting current BD in youth with moderate to severe depression, especially with mental state or personality disorder comorbidities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抑郁青年双相情感障碍诊断量表的心理测量特征。
背景:青少年抑郁症患者发展为双相情感障碍(BD)的风险较高。自我报告的维度测量,如双相情感障碍诊断量表(BSDS),旨在评估这些群体的双相情感障碍。我们在一群抑郁、寻求帮助的年轻人中探索了这种工具的特性。方法:我们使用了来自两项随机对照试验的基线数据,这些试验对象是无双相障碍或精神疾病病史并完成了BSDS (n = 240;平均年龄 = 19.9 岁,标准差 = 2.7;女性 = 57 %)。在26周时重复结构化诊断评估,以检测新发双相障碍。我们使用BSDS的既定阈值检查并发双相障碍的假阳性率,利用因子分析确定其潜在结构,并使用线性回归探讨BSDS与人口统计学、临床和人格变量之间的关系。结果:假阳性率高。大多数(60 %)参与者在基线时得分高于BSDS阈值,但在26周的研究期间没有人出现BD。一个三因素模型最适合BSDS项目,代表抑郁、躁狂和不稳定因素。BSDS总分、躁狂和不稳定分量表得分与相似的特征相关,但BSDS抑郁分量表的关联模式不同。局限性:由于没有对当前样本进行长期随访,也没有单独的双相青年样本,我们无法确定BSDS的总体判别效度、敏感性或长期预测效度。结论:在推荐的阈值下,BSDS在检测中重度抑郁的青年双相障碍中有很高的假阳性率,尤其是伴有精神状态或人格障碍合并症的青年双相障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
期刊最新文献
Attention and emotion in adolescents with ADHD; a time-varying functional connectivity study. Loneliness partially mediates the relationship between Internet access and cognitive function in late adulthood: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Middle frontal gyrus volume mediates the relationship between interleukin-1β and antidepressant response in major depressive disorder. Multiple pathways to suicide: A network analysis based on three components of psychological pain. Emptiness in patients with borderline personality disorder: Severity and predictors of outcome over 24 years of prospective follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1