Prioritising domains of glucocorticoid therapy to measure in trials: Results from a modified delphi exercise from the OMERACT glucocorticoid impact working group.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152602
Joanna Tieu, Jonathan Tl Cheah, Suellen Lyne, Kevin Yip, Nilasha Ghosh, Pamela Richards, Robin Christensen, Rachel J Black, Joanna C Robson, Sarah L Mackie, Catherine L Hill, Susan M Goodman
{"title":"Prioritising domains of glucocorticoid therapy to measure in trials: Results from a modified delphi exercise from the OMERACT glucocorticoid impact working group.","authors":"Joanna Tieu, Jonathan Tl Cheah, Suellen Lyne, Kevin Yip, Nilasha Ghosh, Pamela Richards, Robin Christensen, Rachel J Black, Joanna C Robson, Sarah L Mackie, Catherine L Hill, Susan M Goodman","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is no consensus amongst patients and healthcare professionals about how to measure important adverse effects of glucocorticoids (GCs) that includes the patient's perspective. The OMERACT GC Impact working group sought to identify the domains of greatest importance to both patients and healthcare professionals for use in a proposed core outcome set.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients and healthcare professionals participated in a Delphi consensus exercise to rate the importance of previously identified candidate domains. Those deemed critical to include by at least 70% in both groups, after three rounds of a Delphi exercise were identified as meeting consensus. All participants were asked which additional domains should be measured in all trials in a final survey; those domains selected by more than 70% of all participants were added, resulting in a final list of potential core domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 363 people (295 patients and 68 healthcare professionals) participated in the Delphi process. The final list of potential core domains included: bone fragility, diabetes, eye problems and/or changes in vision, high blood pressure, infection, osteonecrosis, mood disturbance, fatigue, sleep disturbance, weight.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 10 domains identified through this exercise informed the proposed core domain set of GC effects to be considered for use in future clinical trials involving GCs. This core domain set was endorsed at the OMERACT 2020 virtual workshop.</p>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":" ","pages":"152602"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152602","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is no consensus amongst patients and healthcare professionals about how to measure important adverse effects of glucocorticoids (GCs) that includes the patient's perspective. The OMERACT GC Impact working group sought to identify the domains of greatest importance to both patients and healthcare professionals for use in a proposed core outcome set.

Methods: Patients and healthcare professionals participated in a Delphi consensus exercise to rate the importance of previously identified candidate domains. Those deemed critical to include by at least 70% in both groups, after three rounds of a Delphi exercise were identified as meeting consensus. All participants were asked which additional domains should be measured in all trials in a final survey; those domains selected by more than 70% of all participants were added, resulting in a final list of potential core domains.

Results: In total, 363 people (295 patients and 68 healthcare professionals) participated in the Delphi process. The final list of potential core domains included: bone fragility, diabetes, eye problems and/or changes in vision, high blood pressure, infection, osteonecrosis, mood disturbance, fatigue, sleep disturbance, weight.

Conclusion: The 10 domains identified through this exercise informed the proposed core domain set of GC effects to be considered for use in future clinical trials involving GCs. This core domain set was endorsed at the OMERACT 2020 virtual workshop.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在试验中衡量糖皮质激素治疗的优先领域:来自OMERACT糖皮质激素影响工作组的修改德尔菲练习的结果。
关于如何测量糖皮质激素(GCs)的重要不良反应,包括患者的观点,患者和医疗保健专业人员之间没有达成共识。OMERACT GC影响工作组试图确定对患者和医疗保健专业人员最重要的领域,以用于拟议的核心结果集。方法:患者和医疗保健专业人员参加德尔菲共识练习,以评估以前确定的候选领域的重要性。在经过三轮德尔菲分析后,两组中至少有70%的人认为关键的问题符合共识。在最后的调查中,所有参与者都被问及在所有试验中应该测量哪些额外的领域;所有参与者中超过70%的人选择的域名被添加,从而形成潜在核心域名的最终列表。结果:共有363人(295名患者和68名医护人员)参与了德尔菲过程。潜在核心领域的最终列表包括:骨骼脆弱、糖尿病、眼部问题和/或视力变化、高血压、感染、骨坏死、情绪障碍、疲劳、睡眠障碍、体重。结论:通过这项研究确定的10个结构域为GC效应的核心结构域集提供了信息,这些效应将被考虑用于未来涉及GC的临床试验。该核心域名集在OMERACT 2020虚拟研讨会上得到了认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Microbial pathways contributing to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: Advancing the identification and management. The cause is worse than the effect: Inequities in the United States health system; how could we change them? Metabolic checkpoints in rheumatoid arthritis. Promises and pitfalls of artificial intelligence models in forecasting rheumatoid arthritis treatment response and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1