Is Sarcopenia Associated with Worse Outcomes Following Ventral Hernia Repair? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1089/lap.2024.0319
Carlos A Balthazar da Silveira, Diego B S Zamata-Ovalle, Ana Caroline D Rasador, João P G Kasakewitch, Flavio Malcher, Diego L Lima
{"title":"Is Sarcopenia Associated with Worse Outcomes Following Ventral Hernia Repair? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Carlos A Balthazar da Silveira, Diego B S Zamata-Ovalle, Ana Caroline D Rasador, João P G Kasakewitch, Flavio Malcher, Diego L Lima","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The concept of preoperative prehabilitation has garnered attention as a means to manage the comorbidities of patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR). In this regard, some comorbidities have been studied as potential risk factors for postoperative complications following VHR, such as diabetes, immunosuppression, and smoking. However, evidence regarding the impact of sarcopenia, defined by reduced muscle mass and highly associated with frailty syndrome, remains a gap. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis analyzing the impact of sarcopenia on VHR outcomes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Cochrane Central, Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for studies analyzing the impact of sarcopenia on VHR from inception until April 2024. Outcomes assessed were recurrence, surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infection (SSI), and hospital length of stay (LOS). Data analysis was done using RStudio 4.1.2 Software. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The initial search yielded 263 results, of which 172 were screened after the exclusion of the duplicates. The full-text review was done for eight studies, of which three were included after applying the eligibility criteria. Our sample comprised 275 patients, of which 79 (28,7%) presented with sarcopenia. All included studies used radiological muscle findings to define sarcopenia. Our analysis showed no differences in recurrence rates between patients with sarcopenia and controls (risk ratios [RR]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-1.94; <i>P</i> = .35). Furthermore, no differences were found in SSI (RR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.39-1.25.; <i>P</i> = .23). Interestingly, a higher SSO rate was noted for patients without sarcopenia (95% CI: 0.35-0.96; <i>P</i> = .04). No differences were found in LOS (mean difference 4.7 hours; 95% CI: -0.67 to 10.1; <i>P</i> = .4). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our analysis showed no differences were found in recurrence, SSI, and LOS following VHR in patients with sarcopenia. Furthermore, there was a reduced SSO for patients with sarcopenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"42-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The concept of preoperative prehabilitation has garnered attention as a means to manage the comorbidities of patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR). In this regard, some comorbidities have been studied as potential risk factors for postoperative complications following VHR, such as diabetes, immunosuppression, and smoking. However, evidence regarding the impact of sarcopenia, defined by reduced muscle mass and highly associated with frailty syndrome, remains a gap. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis analyzing the impact of sarcopenia on VHR outcomes. Methods: Cochrane Central, Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for studies analyzing the impact of sarcopenia on VHR from inception until April 2024. Outcomes assessed were recurrence, surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infection (SSI), and hospital length of stay (LOS). Data analysis was done using RStudio 4.1.2 Software. Results: The initial search yielded 263 results, of which 172 were screened after the exclusion of the duplicates. The full-text review was done for eight studies, of which three were included after applying the eligibility criteria. Our sample comprised 275 patients, of which 79 (28,7%) presented with sarcopenia. All included studies used radiological muscle findings to define sarcopenia. Our analysis showed no differences in recurrence rates between patients with sarcopenia and controls (risk ratios [RR]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-1.94; P = .35). Furthermore, no differences were found in SSI (RR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.39-1.25.; P = .23). Interestingly, a higher SSO rate was noted for patients without sarcopenia (95% CI: 0.35-0.96; P = .04). No differences were found in LOS (mean difference 4.7 hours; 95% CI: -0.67 to 10.1; P = .4). Conclusion: Our analysis showed no differences were found in recurrence, SSI, and LOS following VHR in patients with sarcopenia. Furthermore, there was a reduced SSO for patients with sarcopenia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sarcopenia 与腹股沟疝修补术后的不良结果有关吗?系统回顾与元分析。
背景:术前康复作为一种管理腹股沟疝修补术(VHR)患者合并症的方法,其概念已引起人们的关注。在这方面,一些合并症已被研究为 VHR 术后并发症的潜在风险因素,如糖尿病、免疫抑制和吸烟。然而,有关肌肉疏松症影响的证据仍是一个空白,肌肉疏松症是指肌肉质量下降,与虚弱综合征高度相关。我们旨在进行一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析,分析肌肉疏松症对 VHR 结果的影响。研究方法在 Cochrane Central、Embase、PubMed、MEDLINE 和 Web of Science 中检索了从开始到 2024 年 4 月期间有关肌肉疏松症对 VHR 影响的分析研究。评估的结果包括复发率、手术部位发生率(SSO)、手术部位感染率(SSI)和住院时间(LOS)。数据分析使用 RStudio 4.1.2 软件进行。结果初步搜索结果为 263 项,排除重复后筛选出 172 项。对 8 项研究进行了全文检讨,其中 3 项研究在适用资格标准后被纳入。我们的样本包括 275 名患者,其中 79 人(28.7%)患有肌肉疏松症。所有纳入的研究都采用了肌肉放射学检查结果来定义肌肉疏松症。我们的分析表明,肌肉疏松症患者与对照组的复发率没有差异(风险比 [RR]:1.24;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.79-1.94;P = .35)。此外,在 SSI 方面也未发现差异(RR:0.7;95% 置信区间:0.39-1.25;P = .23)。有趣的是,无肌肉疏松症患者的 SSO 率较高(95% CI:0.35-0.96;P = .04)。在住院时间方面没有发现差异(平均差异为 4.7 小时;95% CI:-0.67 至 10.1;P = .4)。结论:我们的分析表明,肌肉疏松症患者在进行 VHR 后,复发率、SSI 和 LOS 均无差异。此外,肌肉疏松症患者的 SSO 有所降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
期刊最新文献
Image-Guided Robotic-Assisted Waterjet Ablation of Prostate (Aquablation) Versus Convective Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (Rezūm) in Patients with Prostate Volume Less than 80 Grams. First Case of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Patient with Situs Inversus Totalis in Ethiopia. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer. Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration: How We Do It? A 5-Year-Experience Report. Complete Mesocolic Excision Versus D2 Lymphadenectomy for Right Colon Cancer: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Assessing Surgical and Perioperative Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1