Michaela Rippl, Pauline Grupp, Sebastian Martini, Katharina Müller, Olivia Tausendfreund, Ralf Schmidmaier, Michael Drey
{"title":"Characteristics of patients with very high fracture risk in a community-dwelling geriatric cohort.","authors":"Michaela Rippl, Pauline Grupp, Sebastian Martini, Katharina Müller, Olivia Tausendfreund, Ralf Schmidmaier, Michael Drey","doi":"10.1016/j.bone.2024.117366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bone anabolic treatment has been shown to be superior to oral bisphosphonates, especially in osteoporosis patients with a very high fracture-risk. The current German osteoporosis guideline classifies the very high 3-year fracture-risk based upon a novel fracture-risk model. As age is a severe risk-factor, we examined the distribution and associations to geriatric assessment parameters of the very high-risk group in a well-characterized cohort of community-dwelling geriatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses were based on 166 patients (mean age 82 ± 6 years) taken from MUSAR (MUnich SArcopenia Registry). Fracture-risk was calculated as described in the current German guideline. Thereupon, patients were allocated to the low-/moderate (<5 %), high- (5-10 %) or very high-risk group (>10 %). Associations of geriatric assessment parameters with the group allocation to the fracture-risk group were evaluated by covariate-adjusted linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>>80 % of the study population were at an increased fracture-risk. Besides, >50 % were allocated to the very high-risk group. Patients in the very high-risk group showed limitations in all physical performance tests (short physical performance battery (SPPB), gaitspeed, handgrip strength and chair rise test). Also, polypharmacy and a risk for malnutrition (from mini nutritional assessment short form (MNA-SF)), were present. All parameters showed significant associations with group allocation to very high-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the geriatric patients are at a very high-risk for osteoporotic fractures. Also, this group presented several limitations in the comprehensive geriatric assessment highlighting the vulnerability of this group. Clinicians need to reinforce fracture-risk assessment and familiarize with treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":93913,"journal":{"name":"Bone","volume":" ","pages":"117366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2024.117366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Bone anabolic treatment has been shown to be superior to oral bisphosphonates, especially in osteoporosis patients with a very high fracture-risk. The current German osteoporosis guideline classifies the very high 3-year fracture-risk based upon a novel fracture-risk model. As age is a severe risk-factor, we examined the distribution and associations to geriatric assessment parameters of the very high-risk group in a well-characterized cohort of community-dwelling geriatric patients.
Methods: Analyses were based on 166 patients (mean age 82 ± 6 years) taken from MUSAR (MUnich SArcopenia Registry). Fracture-risk was calculated as described in the current German guideline. Thereupon, patients were allocated to the low-/moderate (<5 %), high- (5-10 %) or very high-risk group (>10 %). Associations of geriatric assessment parameters with the group allocation to the fracture-risk group were evaluated by covariate-adjusted linear regression analysis.
Results: >80 % of the study population were at an increased fracture-risk. Besides, >50 % were allocated to the very high-risk group. Patients in the very high-risk group showed limitations in all physical performance tests (short physical performance battery (SPPB), gaitspeed, handgrip strength and chair rise test). Also, polypharmacy and a risk for malnutrition (from mini nutritional assessment short form (MNA-SF)), were present. All parameters showed significant associations with group allocation to very high-risk group.
Conclusion: Most of the geriatric patients are at a very high-risk for osteoporotic fractures. Also, this group presented several limitations in the comprehensive geriatric assessment highlighting the vulnerability of this group. Clinicians need to reinforce fracture-risk assessment and familiarize with treatment options.