Diabetes distress and associated factors among adults with diabetes mellitus residing in a metropolitan city of India: a community-based study.

Anam Anil Alwani, Ravneet Kaur, Mohan Bairwa, Puneet Misra, Baridalyne Nongkynrih
{"title":"Diabetes distress and associated factors among adults with diabetes mellitus residing in a metropolitan city of India: a community-based study.","authors":"Anam Anil Alwani, Ravneet Kaur, Mohan Bairwa, Puneet Misra, Baridalyne Nongkynrih","doi":"10.1186/s40842-024-00203-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes distress \"refers to the negative emotional or affective experiences resulting from the challenge of living with the demands of diabetes.\" Despite recommendations to screen for distress at regular intervals, it usually remains undiagnosed. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of diabetes distress among adults living with diabetes, determine the factors associated with distress, the association between selfcare and distress, glycemic control and distress and compare the health-related quality of life among those with and without distress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, community-based study was conducted in an urban colony in Delhi, India. The participants were selected using simple random sampling and included adults diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. The sample size calculated was 390. The questionnaire included the Diabetes Distress Scale 17, Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire and Healthy Days measure. Factors associated with distress were tested using bivariate followed by multivariable logistic regression. Multivariable logistic regression was used to find the association between selfcare and distress and glycemic control and distress. Mean number of unhealthy days and health rating were compared between distressed and non-distressed diabetics using Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi square test respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 412 adults were included in the study, of which 35.4% had clinically significant distress. Female sex, low socio-economic status, 1 or more comorbidities, diagnosis of diabetes 10 or more years prior, being on treatment and an unmet need for social support were the factors found to be associated with distress. There was a positive association between physicians contact and distress. Those with poor glycemic control had higher odds of distress. There was a significant difference in the health reported by those with and without distress (p < 0.001). Those with distress also suffered from significantly more physically unhealthy days and mentally unhealthy days than those without distress (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, more than one in three diabetics were found to be distressed. Healthcare providers should increase their focus on the psychological aspects of diabetes and improve their communication with patients. Diabetes distress needs to be screened for in routine clinical settings and addressed appropriately.</p>","PeriodicalId":56339,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology","volume":"10 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40842-024-00203-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetes distress "refers to the negative emotional or affective experiences resulting from the challenge of living with the demands of diabetes." Despite recommendations to screen for distress at regular intervals, it usually remains undiagnosed. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of diabetes distress among adults living with diabetes, determine the factors associated with distress, the association between selfcare and distress, glycemic control and distress and compare the health-related quality of life among those with and without distress.

Methods: This cross-sectional, community-based study was conducted in an urban colony in Delhi, India. The participants were selected using simple random sampling and included adults diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. The sample size calculated was 390. The questionnaire included the Diabetes Distress Scale 17, Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire and Healthy Days measure. Factors associated with distress were tested using bivariate followed by multivariable logistic regression. Multivariable logistic regression was used to find the association between selfcare and distress and glycemic control and distress. Mean number of unhealthy days and health rating were compared between distressed and non-distressed diabetics using Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi square test respectively.

Results: A total of 412 adults were included in the study, of which 35.4% had clinically significant distress. Female sex, low socio-economic status, 1 or more comorbidities, diagnosis of diabetes 10 or more years prior, being on treatment and an unmet need for social support were the factors found to be associated with distress. There was a positive association between physicians contact and distress. Those with poor glycemic control had higher odds of distress. There was a significant difference in the health reported by those with and without distress (p < 0.001). Those with distress also suffered from significantly more physically unhealthy days and mentally unhealthy days than those without distress (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In this study, more than one in three diabetics were found to be distressed. Healthcare providers should increase their focus on the psychological aspects of diabetes and improve their communication with patients. Diabetes distress needs to be screened for in routine clinical settings and addressed appropriately.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology is an open access journal publishing within the field of diabetes and endocrine disease. The journal aims to provide a widely available resource for people working within the field of diabetes and endocrinology, in order to improve the care of people affected by these conditions. The audience includes, but is not limited to, physicians, researchers, nurses, nutritionists, pharmacists, podiatrists, psychologists, epidemiologists, exercise physiologists and health care researchers. Research articles include patient-based research (clinical trials, clinical studies, and others), translational research (translation of basic science to clinical practice, translation of clinical practice to policy and others), as well as epidemiology and health care research. Clinical articles include case reports, case seminars, consensus statements, clinical practice guidelines and evidence-based medicine. Only articles considered to contribute new knowledge to the field will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Diabetes distress and associated factors among adults with diabetes mellitus residing in a metropolitan city of India: a community-based study. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and risk factors of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Nigeria. Adherence to diabetic retinopathy screening among children and young adults in Bangladesh. From adiposity to steatosis: metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, a hepatic expression of metabolic syndrome - current insights and future directions. Does EFSA statement on Monacolin content of nutraceutical combinations impair their lipid lowering effect? The LopiGLIK experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1