Demographic rescue falters when pathogens are present

IF 4.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecology Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1002/ecy.4495
Catherine L. Searle, Stephanie O. Gutierrez, Ilinca I. Ciubotariu, Alana López-Cruz, Mark R. Christie
{"title":"Demographic rescue falters when pathogens are present","authors":"Catherine L. Searle,&nbsp;Stephanie O. Gutierrez,&nbsp;Ilinca I. Ciubotariu,&nbsp;Alana López-Cruz,&nbsp;Mark R. Christie","doi":"10.1002/ecy.4495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As natural populations continue to decline globally, direct forms of intervention are increasingly necessary to prevent extinction. One type of intervention, known as demographic rescue, occurs when individuals are added directly to a population to increase abundance and ultimately prevent population extinction. However, the role of infectious disease in demographic rescue remains unknown. To examine the effects of pathogens on demographic rescue, we used a host–pathogen system with the aquatic crustacean <i>Daphnia dentifera</i> as the host and the fungus <i>Metschnikowia bicuspidata</i> as the pathogen. We constructed a randomized 3 × 2 factorial experiment with three rescue treatments (none, low, high) and two pathogen treatments (unexposed, exposed), where the pathogen was introduced via infected individuals during rescue events. We found that adding more individuals to demographically depressed populations increased abundance over the short term; highly supplemented populations initially had 62% more individuals than populations that had no introduced individuals. However, by the end of the experiment, populations that did not have any individuals introduced averaged 640% higher abundance than populations where infected individuals had been added. Thus, the introduction of infected individuals can result in worse demographic outcomes for populations than if no rescue is attempted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.4495","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.4495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As natural populations continue to decline globally, direct forms of intervention are increasingly necessary to prevent extinction. One type of intervention, known as demographic rescue, occurs when individuals are added directly to a population to increase abundance and ultimately prevent population extinction. However, the role of infectious disease in demographic rescue remains unknown. To examine the effects of pathogens on demographic rescue, we used a host–pathogen system with the aquatic crustacean Daphnia dentifera as the host and the fungus Metschnikowia bicuspidata as the pathogen. We constructed a randomized 3 × 2 factorial experiment with three rescue treatments (none, low, high) and two pathogen treatments (unexposed, exposed), where the pathogen was introduced via infected individuals during rescue events. We found that adding more individuals to demographically depressed populations increased abundance over the short term; highly supplemented populations initially had 62% more individuals than populations that had no introduced individuals. However, by the end of the experiment, populations that did not have any individuals introduced averaged 640% higher abundance than populations where infected individuals had been added. Thus, the introduction of infected individuals can result in worse demographic outcomes for populations than if no rescue is attempted.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当病原体出现时,人口救援就会动摇。
随着全球自然种群数量的持续下降,为了防止灭绝,直接干预的形式越来越必要。一种被称为人口救助的干预措施是将个体直接添加到种群中,以增加种群的丰度,最终防止种群灭绝。然而,传染病在人口救援中的作用仍然未知。为了研究病原菌对人口统计学救助的影响,我们采用以水生甲壳类水蚤(Daphnia dentifera)为寄主,以双尖蚤(Metschnikowia bicuspidata)为病原菌的宿主-病原菌系统。我们构建了一个随机的3 × 2因子实验,包括三种救援处理(无、低、高)和两种病原体处理(未暴露、暴露),其中病原体是在救援事件中通过被感染的个体引入的。我们发现,在人口统计学上抑郁的人群中增加更多的个体,在短期内会增加丰度;高度补充的种群最初比没有引入个体的种群多出62%的个体。然而,在实验结束时,没有引入任何个体的种群的丰度平均比添加了受感染个体的种群高640%。因此,引入受感染的个体对人口的影响可能比不采取任何救援措施更糟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
期刊最新文献
Uncovering the mechanisms underpinning divergent environmental change impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning The relative influence of climate extremes and species richness on the temporal variability of bird communities Residential development reduces black bear (Ursus americanus) opportunity to scavenge cougar (Puma concolor) killed prey DiverReef: A global database of the behavior of recreational divers and their interactions with reefs over 20 years Historical reindeer corrals in northern boreal forests reveal divergent post-disturbance reorganization by forest type
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1