Field test of geosynthetic-reinforced floating pile-supported embankments on soft soil

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geotextiles and Geomembranes Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.11.010
Rui Rui , Shi-kai He , Long-fan Peng , S.J.M. Van Eekelen , Liang-hao Li , Yu-qiu Ye
{"title":"Field test of geosynthetic-reinforced floating pile-supported embankments on soft soil","authors":"Rui Rui ,&nbsp;Shi-kai He ,&nbsp;Long-fan Peng ,&nbsp;S.J.M. Van Eekelen ,&nbsp;Liang-hao Li ,&nbsp;Yu-qiu Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.11.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study conducted field tests on geosynthetic-reinforced floating pile-supported embankments to evaluate the load transfer mechanism and embankment deformation during embankment construction. Vertical pressures on pile caps and subsoils between piles, geosynthetic strains, settlement of pile caps and subsoils between piles, and settlement of the embankment at different elevations were measured throughout the embankment construction. Test results showed that the maximum settlement of the pile cap was approximately 66% of subsoils between the piles. Due to the large settlement of the floating piles, the soil arching was not significantly mobilized. The geosynthetic reinforcement exhibited a maximum tensile strain of 0.2% at the end of embankment construction, indicating a mobilization of low tensioned membrane effect. The predicted equal settlement heights at adjacent piles center and the diagonal pile center were close with an average value of approximately 1.23 times the pile net spacing. The measured vertical pressures on subsoil between piles were compared with calculated results using available analytical models from the literature. The analytical models underestimated the vertical pressures on the subsoils between piles, while the modified Terzaghi's model showed better agreement with the measured results than other analytical models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"53 2","pages":"Pages 528-544"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114424001353","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study conducted field tests on geosynthetic-reinforced floating pile-supported embankments to evaluate the load transfer mechanism and embankment deformation during embankment construction. Vertical pressures on pile caps and subsoils between piles, geosynthetic strains, settlement of pile caps and subsoils between piles, and settlement of the embankment at different elevations were measured throughout the embankment construction. Test results showed that the maximum settlement of the pile cap was approximately 66% of subsoils between the piles. Due to the large settlement of the floating piles, the soil arching was not significantly mobilized. The geosynthetic reinforcement exhibited a maximum tensile strain of 0.2% at the end of embankment construction, indicating a mobilization of low tensioned membrane effect. The predicted equal settlement heights at adjacent piles center and the diagonal pile center were close with an average value of approximately 1.23 times the pile net spacing. The measured vertical pressures on subsoil between piles were compared with calculated results using available analytical models from the literature. The analytical models underestimated the vertical pressures on the subsoils between piles, while the modified Terzaghi's model showed better agreement with the measured results than other analytical models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软土上土工合成筋浮桩支撑路堤的现场试验
本文对土工合成筋浮桩支撑路堤进行了现场试验,对路堤施工过程中的荷载传递机理和路堤变形进行了评价。在整个路堤施工过程中,测量了承台和桩间底土的竖向压力、土工合成应变、承台和桩间底土的沉降以及不同标高路堤的沉降。试验结果表明,承台最大沉降量约为桩间底土沉降量的66%。由于浮桩沉降较大,土拱没有受到明显的调动。土工合成钢筋在路堤施工结束时的最大拉伸应变为0.2%,表明低张力膜效应的动员。相邻桩心和对角桩心预测的等沉降高度接近,平均值约为桩网距的1.23倍。将实测的桩间底土竖向压力与文献中现有分析模型的计算结果进行了比较。分析模型低估了桩间底土的竖向压力,而改进的Terzaghi模型与实测结果吻合较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Geotextiles and Geomembranes 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
21.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident. Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Use of soilbags to protect flexible pipes against repeated load effects Editorial Board Deformation and load transfer of pile-supported foundation reinforced with soilbags raft cushion Evaluation of two-layered soils reinforced with 3D printed geogrid models under axisymmetric loading conditions Numerical investigation of ground reinforced embankments: Structural geometry design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1