Current Trends in Deep Plane Neck Lifting: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004163
Sachin R Chinta, Hilliard T Brydges, Matteo Laspro, Alay R Shah, Joshua Cohen, Daniel J Ceradini
{"title":"Current Trends in Deep Plane Neck Lifting: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Sachin R Chinta, Hilliard T Brydges, Matteo Laspro, Alay R Shah, Joshua Cohen, Daniel J Ceradini","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aging neck is a prevalent aesthetic concern, with over 160,000 neck procedures performed in 2020. It is characterized by increased soft tissue laxity and displacement of cervical structures. While nonsurgical interventions like cryoablation and laser resurfacing show promise, their variable responses highlight the necessity for surgical solutions. Traditional neck lifts address superficial structures but often neglect the subplatysmal plane. Recently, deep plane neck lifts have gained attention for addressing deeper anatomical structures. This paper systematically reviews the literature on subplatysmal modifications in cervicoplasty, aiming to clarify the risks and benefits of these evolving surgical techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On February 20, 2024, a systematic review adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines was performed. MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were searched for terms related to neck rejuvenation. Independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, including all relevant studies. Data extracted included patient numbers, procedures, outcomes, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From an initial 771 articles, 57 studies encompassing 8648 patients met inclusion criteria. The most commonly altered anatomical structures during \"deep plane\" neck lift (DPNL) were the submandibular gland (69.9%), digastric muscles (58.6%), and subplatysmal fat (48.6%). Postoperative complications were reported in 59.6% of studies, with nerve palsy (0.2%-12%) and hematoma (0.2%-4%) being most common. Aesthetic outcomes were less frequently reported (56% of studies); patient satisfaction ranged from 81.6% to 98.6%, while objective measures were reported in only 12% of studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recent surveys indicate a growing concern over excess laxity under the chin, with patients increasingly seeking neck rejuvenation. Our review found that DPNL techniques vary widely, with the submandibular gland and digastric muscles being the most frequently altered structures. Despite a general lack of standardized outcome measures, patient satisfaction was high. However, DPNL showed a higher rate of postoperative nerve palsy compared to traditional neck lift. Overall, while DPNL demonstrates potential aesthetic benefits, the increased risk necessitates thorough patient counseling and further studies for standardization and comparison.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"222-228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aging neck is a prevalent aesthetic concern, with over 160,000 neck procedures performed in 2020. It is characterized by increased soft tissue laxity and displacement of cervical structures. While nonsurgical interventions like cryoablation and laser resurfacing show promise, their variable responses highlight the necessity for surgical solutions. Traditional neck lifts address superficial structures but often neglect the subplatysmal plane. Recently, deep plane neck lifts have gained attention for addressing deeper anatomical structures. This paper systematically reviews the literature on subplatysmal modifications in cervicoplasty, aiming to clarify the risks and benefits of these evolving surgical techniques.

Methods: On February 20, 2024, a systematic review adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines was performed. MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were searched for terms related to neck rejuvenation. Independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, including all relevant studies. Data extracted included patient numbers, procedures, outcomes, and complications.

Results: From an initial 771 articles, 57 studies encompassing 8648 patients met inclusion criteria. The most commonly altered anatomical structures during "deep plane" neck lift (DPNL) were the submandibular gland (69.9%), digastric muscles (58.6%), and subplatysmal fat (48.6%). Postoperative complications were reported in 59.6% of studies, with nerve palsy (0.2%-12%) and hematoma (0.2%-4%) being most common. Aesthetic outcomes were less frequently reported (56% of studies); patient satisfaction ranged from 81.6% to 98.6%, while objective measures were reported in only 12% of studies.

Conclusions: Recent surveys indicate a growing concern over excess laxity under the chin, with patients increasingly seeking neck rejuvenation. Our review found that DPNL techniques vary widely, with the submandibular gland and digastric muscles being the most frequently altered structures. Despite a general lack of standardized outcome measures, patient satisfaction was high. However, DPNL showed a higher rate of postoperative nerve palsy compared to traditional neck lift. Overall, while DPNL demonstrates potential aesthetic benefits, the increased risk necessitates thorough patient counseling and further studies for standardization and comparison.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深平面颈部提升的当前趋势:系统综述。
颈部老化是一个普遍的美学问题,2020年有超过16万例颈部手术。其特点是软组织松弛和颈椎结构移位增加。虽然冷冻消融和激光表面置换等非手术干预措施显示出希望,但它们的不同反应突出了手术解决方案的必要性。传统的颈部提升术针对的是表面结构,但往往忽略了阔椎下平面。最近,深平面颈部提升术因解决深层解剖结构而受到关注。本文系统地回顾了颈椎成形术中关于颈椎病下改良的文献,旨在阐明这些不断发展的手术技术的风险和益处。方法:2024年2月20日,遵循2020年系统评价和meta分析指南的首选报告项目进行了系统评价。在MEDLINE、PubMed、Cochrane和Scopus数据库中检索与颈部年轻化相关的术语。独立审稿人筛选了题目、摘要和全文,包括所有相关研究。提取的数据包括患者数量、手术、结果和并发症。结果:从最初的771篇文章中,57项研究包括8648名患者符合纳入标准。在“深平面”颈部提升术(DPNL)中,最常见的解剖结构改变是下颌下腺(69.9%)、二腹肌(58.6%)和板下脂肪(48.6%)。59.6%的研究报告了术后并发症,其中神经麻痹(0.2%-12%)和血肿(0.2%-4%)最为常见。美学结果的报道频率较低(56%的研究);患者满意度从81.6%到98.6%不等,而只有12%的研究报告了客观测量。结论:最近的调查表明,随着越来越多的患者寻求颈部年轻化,人们越来越关注下巴下的过度松弛。我们的综述发现DPNL技术差异很大,下颌下腺和二腹肌是最常见的改变结构。尽管普遍缺乏标准化的结果测量,但患者满意度很高。然而,与传统的颈部提升术相比,DPNL术后神经麻痹的发生率更高。总的来说,虽然DPNL显示出潜在的美学优势,但增加的风险需要彻底的患者咨询和进一步的标准化和比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Hourglass Constriction of a Single Fascicle of the Anterior Interosseous Nerve: A Case Report. Interprogram Differences in Core General, Core Plastic, and Plastic Surgery-Adjacent Training. Simple Approach to Cosmetic Medial Epicanthoplasty: A Modification of the Skin Redraping Method. The Impact of International Fellowship on Research Productivity: International Fellowship on Research Productivity. Mandible Fracture Outcome Disparities in the Incarcerated Patient Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1