Hierarchically Positioning Laparoscopic Microwave Ablation in the Therapeutic Span of Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-Life Comparative Analysis.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16462-8
Umberto Cillo, Silvia Caregari, Matteo Barabino, Ilaria Billato, Andrea Marchini, Alessandro Furlanetto, Sara Lazzari, Marco Brolese, Mattia Ballo, Elisabetta Biasini, Ciro Celsa, Angelo Sangiovanni, Francesco Giuseppe Foschi, Claudia Campani, Gianpaolo Vidili, Carlo Saitta, Fabio Piscaglia, Maurizia Rossana Brunetto, Alberto Masotto, Fabio Farinati, Franco Trevisani, Marco Antonio Zappa, Alessandro Vitale, Roberto Santambrogio
{"title":"Hierarchically Positioning Laparoscopic Microwave Ablation in the Therapeutic Span of Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-Life Comparative Analysis.","authors":"Umberto Cillo, Silvia Caregari, Matteo Barabino, Ilaria Billato, Andrea Marchini, Alessandro Furlanetto, Sara Lazzari, Marco Brolese, Mattia Ballo, Elisabetta Biasini, Ciro Celsa, Angelo Sangiovanni, Francesco Giuseppe Foschi, Claudia Campani, Gianpaolo Vidili, Carlo Saitta, Fabio Piscaglia, Maurizia Rossana Brunetto, Alberto Masotto, Fabio Farinati, Franco Trevisani, Marco Antonio Zappa, Alessandro Vitale, Roberto Santambrogio","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-16462-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic microwave ablation (LMWA) has yet to gain a specific place in treatment guidelines for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study compared the outcomes of LMWA and trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for early non-resectable patients with HCC, taking percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) as the reference treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicenter observational study was conducted, enrolling non-transplantable, non-resectable patients who had early HCC treated with LMWA (n = 658) from Padua and Milan centers, and with PRFA (n = 844), and TACE (n = 425) from the ITA.LI.CA multicenter database. The matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) method was used to obtain weighted LMWA and TACE populations similar to the reference PRFA population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Laparoscopic ablation showed an excellent safety profile, and MAIC-weighted early postoperative deaths were comparable among the groups. The MAIC-weighted overall survival was similar between the LMWA (1-, 3-, and 5 year survival of 91.0 %, 67.9 %, 47.0 %, respectively) and PRFA (1-, 3- and 5 year survivals of 90.0 %, 64.7 %, 46.6 %, respectively) groups (p = 0.678) and significantly better for the LMWA group than for the TACE group (1-, 3- and 5 year survivals of 84.7 %, 48.8 %, 33.6 %, respectively) (p < 0.001). Weighted multivariate overall survival analysis and competing risk/subgroup analyses confirmed the non-inferiority of LMWA to PRFA and its superiority to TACE. The LMWA- and PRFA-treated patients had a significantly lower risk of HCC-related death (p = 0.004) than the TACE-treated patients (p = 0.001). Conversely, the groups did not differ significantly in terms of non-HCC-related deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The non-inferiority of LMWA to PRFA, its superiority to TACE, and its applicability to a wide range of presentations with few contraindications support its inclusion among radical therapies for treating early-HCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1063-1072"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16462-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic microwave ablation (LMWA) has yet to gain a specific place in treatment guidelines for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study compared the outcomes of LMWA and trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for early non-resectable patients with HCC, taking percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) as the reference treatment.

Methods: A retrospective multicenter observational study was conducted, enrolling non-transplantable, non-resectable patients who had early HCC treated with LMWA (n = 658) from Padua and Milan centers, and with PRFA (n = 844), and TACE (n = 425) from the ITA.LI.CA multicenter database. The matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) method was used to obtain weighted LMWA and TACE populations similar to the reference PRFA population.

Results: Laparoscopic ablation showed an excellent safety profile, and MAIC-weighted early postoperative deaths were comparable among the groups. The MAIC-weighted overall survival was similar between the LMWA (1-, 3-, and 5 year survival of 91.0 %, 67.9 %, 47.0 %, respectively) and PRFA (1-, 3- and 5 year survivals of 90.0 %, 64.7 %, 46.6 %, respectively) groups (p = 0.678) and significantly better for the LMWA group than for the TACE group (1-, 3- and 5 year survivals of 84.7 %, 48.8 %, 33.6 %, respectively) (p < 0.001). Weighted multivariate overall survival analysis and competing risk/subgroup analyses confirmed the non-inferiority of LMWA to PRFA and its superiority to TACE. The LMWA- and PRFA-treated patients had a significantly lower risk of HCC-related death (p = 0.004) than the TACE-treated patients (p = 0.001). Conversely, the groups did not differ significantly in terms of non-HCC-related deaths.

Conclusions: The non-inferiority of LMWA to PRFA, its superiority to TACE, and its applicability to a wide range of presentations with few contraindications support its inclusion among radical therapies for treating early-HCC patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分层定位腹腔镜微波消融治疗早期肝细胞癌:现实对比分析。
背景:腹腔镜微波消融(LMWA)在早期肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗指南中尚未获得特定的地位。本研究以经皮射频消融(PRFA)作为对照治疗,比较LMWA和经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗早期不可切除HCC患者的疗效。方法:进行了一项回顾性多中心观察性研究,纳入了来自帕多瓦和米兰中心的LMWA (n = 658)和来自ITA.LI.CA多中心数据库的PRFA (n = 844)和TACE (n = 425)治疗的不可移植、不可切除的早期HCC患者。采用匹配调整间接比较(MAIC)方法获得与参考PRFA种群相似的加权LMWA和TACE种群。结果:腹腔镜消融术显示出极好的安全性,各组间的术后早期死亡率具有可比性。LMWA组(1年、3年、5年生存率分别为91.0%、67.9%、47.0%)和PRFA组(1年、3年、5年生存率分别为90.0%、64.7%、46.6%)的mac加权总生存率相似(p = 0.678),且LMWA组显著优于TACE组(1年、3年、5年生存率分别为84.7%、48.8%、33.6%)(p < 0.001)。加权多变量总生存分析和竞争风险/亚组分析证实了LMWA对PRFA的非劣效性和对TACE的优越性。LMWA和prfa治疗的患者hcc相关死亡风险显著低于tace治疗的患者(p = 0.001)。相反,两组在非hcc相关死亡方面没有显著差异。结论:LMWA相对于PRFA的非劣效性,相对于TACE的优越性,适用于广泛的表现,禁忌症少,支持将其纳入治疗早期hcc患者的根治性治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
期刊最新文献
ASO Visual Abstract: Hashimoto's Thyroiditis Shows Sex- and Age-Dependent Inverse Associations with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Progression: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of 6963 Surgical Cases. Correction: Risk Factors for Recurrence of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Anatomical Segmentectomy. ASO Visual Abstract: Prediction of Tracheobronchial Invasion in ycT3 Esophageal Cancer Using Contact Angle on Preoperative CT Images: A Multicenter Analysis. ASO Visual Abstract: External Validation of a Pragmatic Scoring System for Predicting Upgrade of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at the Time of Surgery. ASO Visual Abstract: The Effect of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection on Cancer-Specific Mortality in Partial Cystectomy According to Eligibility Criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1