Emergency clinician perceptions of end-of-life care in Irish emergency departments: a cross-sectional survey.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2023-213534
James Foley, Etimbuk Umana, Saema Saeed, Jeffrey Mulcaire, Owen Keane, Leonard Browne, Mary Jane O' Leary, Conor Deasy
{"title":"Emergency clinician perceptions of end-of-life care in Irish emergency departments: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"James Foley, Etimbuk Umana, Saema Saeed, Jeffrey Mulcaire, Owen Keane, Leonard Browne, Mary Jane O' Leary, Conor Deasy","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with end-of-life care (EoLC) needs present to the emergency departments (ED) frequently and at times, it can be difficult to provide a high standard of care. Within the Irish setting, there is limited literature on the provision of EoLC in EDs and this study, therefore, aimed to evaluate the perceptions of emergency medicine (EM) clinicians regarding the provision of EoLC in EDs in Ireland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The End-of-Life Care in Emergency Department Study was a cross-sectional electronic survey study of EM doctors working across 23 of the 29 EDs in the Ireland. This study was conducted through the Irish Trainee Emergency Research Network over a 6-week period from 27 September 2021 to 8 November 2021. Analysis of the survey domains regarding knowledge and attitude has been published previously by the present authors, with this current analysis focusing on communication, education and resources for the provision of EoLC in EDs. Descriptive data on outcomes are reported with additional subgroup analysis according to years of experience in EM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 694 potential respondents, 311 (44.8%) had fully completed surveys. The majority (62% n=193) were between 25 and 35 years of age with 60% (n=186) having <5 years' experience in EM; 58% (n=180) were men. Experienced respondents (>10 years' experience) were more likely to agree that they were comfortable discussing EoL with patients and families than those with <5 years' experience (80% vs 32%) (p<0.001). Questions on ED infrastructure revealed that just 23.5% agreed that appropriate rooms are allocated for EoL patients, with just 11.6% agreeing that the physical environment is conducive to the provision of EoLC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EM clinicians agree that they are comfortable breaking bad news and discussing EoLC with patients and families, but disagree that adequate resources and infrastructure are in place to provide a high standard of EoLC in Irish EDs. Challenges exist centred on training and infrastructure and addressing these may lead to enhanced EoLC in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2023-213534","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with end-of-life care (EoLC) needs present to the emergency departments (ED) frequently and at times, it can be difficult to provide a high standard of care. Within the Irish setting, there is limited literature on the provision of EoLC in EDs and this study, therefore, aimed to evaluate the perceptions of emergency medicine (EM) clinicians regarding the provision of EoLC in EDs in Ireland.

Methods: The End-of-Life Care in Emergency Department Study was a cross-sectional electronic survey study of EM doctors working across 23 of the 29 EDs in the Ireland. This study was conducted through the Irish Trainee Emergency Research Network over a 6-week period from 27 September 2021 to 8 November 2021. Analysis of the survey domains regarding knowledge and attitude has been published previously by the present authors, with this current analysis focusing on communication, education and resources for the provision of EoLC in EDs. Descriptive data on outcomes are reported with additional subgroup analysis according to years of experience in EM.

Results: Of the 694 potential respondents, 311 (44.8%) had fully completed surveys. The majority (62% n=193) were between 25 and 35 years of age with 60% (n=186) having <5 years' experience in EM; 58% (n=180) were men. Experienced respondents (>10 years' experience) were more likely to agree that they were comfortable discussing EoL with patients and families than those with <5 years' experience (80% vs 32%) (p<0.001). Questions on ED infrastructure revealed that just 23.5% agreed that appropriate rooms are allocated for EoL patients, with just 11.6% agreeing that the physical environment is conducive to the provision of EoLC.

Conclusion: EM clinicians agree that they are comfortable breaking bad news and discussing EoLC with patients and families, but disagree that adequate resources and infrastructure are in place to provide a high standard of EoLC in Irish EDs. Challenges exist centred on training and infrastructure and addressing these may lead to enhanced EoLC in the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科医生对爱尔兰急诊科临终关怀的看法:横断面调查。
背景:临终关怀(EoLC)患者需要经常出现在急诊科(ED),有时很难提供高水平的护理。在爱尔兰的背景下,关于急诊室提供EoLC的文献有限,因此,本研究旨在评估急诊医学(EM)临床医生对爱尔兰急诊室提供EoLC的看法。方法:急诊科临终关怀研究是一项横断面电子调查研究,研究对象是爱尔兰29家急诊科中的23家急诊科的急诊医生。这项研究是通过爱尔兰受训应急研究网络进行的,为期6周,从2021年9月27日至2021年11月8日。关于知识和态度的调查领域的分析已经由目前的作者发表过,目前的分析集中在教育部门提供EoLC的沟通、教育和资源方面。结果的描述性数据报告,并根据多年的em经验进行额外的亚组分析。结果:在694名潜在受访者中,311名(44.8%)完全完成了调查。大多数人(62% n=193)年龄在25至35岁之间,60% (n=186)有10年的经验)更有可能同意他们与患者和家属讨论EoL比那些有结论:EM临床医生同意他们很舒服地透露坏消息并与患者和家属讨论EoLC,但不同意足够的资源和基础设施在爱尔兰急诊室提供高标准的EoLC。目前存在的挑战集中在培训和基础设施方面,解决这些问题可能会在未来加强EoLC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of self-reported disease severity and need for hospital admission. Best possible care in the circumstances. Being a patient in a crowded emergency department: a qualitative service evaluation. A qualitative study exploring the experiences of advanced clinical practitioner training in emergency care in the South West of England, United Kingdom. How can we improve on advanced clinical practitioner training?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1