Assessment of Exercise Capacity in Patients Diagnosed with Moderate and Severe Bronchial Asthma: Preliminary Prospective Observational Study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Journal of Asthma and Allergy Pub Date : 2024-12-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JAA.S458717
Weronika Alicja Bajer, Marta Majewska-Pulsakowska, Małgorzata Paprocka-Borowicz, Krzysztof Wytrychowski, Jakub Taradaj, Kuba Ptaszkowski
{"title":"Assessment of Exercise Capacity in Patients Diagnosed with Moderate and Severe Bronchial Asthma: Preliminary Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Weronika Alicja Bajer, Marta Majewska-Pulsakowska, Małgorzata Paprocka-Borowicz, Krzysztof Wytrychowski, Jakub Taradaj, Kuba Ptaszkowski","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S458717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The main objective of the study was to assess exercise capacity and physical activity levels in patients with bronchial asthma compared to a control group without asthma, as well as to investigate how asthma severity affects the results of the 6MWT and physical activity as measured by the IPAQ questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 63 individuals were studied, divided into two groups: Group A, consisting of 33 individuals with bronchial asthma, and Group B, consisting of 30 individuals from the general population without bronchial asthma. In both groups, the following assessments were performed: The Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and the Borg rating of perceived exertion scale (the Borg RPE scale) ABB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was demonstrated that patients with moderate asthma covered more distance during the 6MWT than patients diagnosed with severe asthma. The difference in metres covered between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001), which could be observed during the walk test. The results indicate that a larger proportion of patients with asthma (76%) fall into the insufficient physical activity category compared to those without asthma (24%). Conversely, a higher percentage of non-asthmatic individuals (66.67%) report sufficient physical activity compared to asthmatic patients (33.33%)(P=0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that asthma severity significantly impacts exercise capacity, as shown by shorter distances covered in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) among patients with severe asthma. While overall physical activity levels (measured by the IPAQ) were not significantly different between asthma and non-asthma groups, asthma patients exhibited significantly more sitting time, suggesting a more sedentary lifestyle.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1247-1258"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S458717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The main objective of the study was to assess exercise capacity and physical activity levels in patients with bronchial asthma compared to a control group without asthma, as well as to investigate how asthma severity affects the results of the 6MWT and physical activity as measured by the IPAQ questionnaire.

Patients and methods: A total of 63 individuals were studied, divided into two groups: Group A, consisting of 33 individuals with bronchial asthma, and Group B, consisting of 30 individuals from the general population without bronchial asthma. In both groups, the following assessments were performed: The Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and the Borg rating of perceived exertion scale (the Borg RPE scale) ABB.

Results: It was demonstrated that patients with moderate asthma covered more distance during the 6MWT than patients diagnosed with severe asthma. The difference in metres covered between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001), which could be observed during the walk test. The results indicate that a larger proportion of patients with asthma (76%) fall into the insufficient physical activity category compared to those without asthma (24%). Conversely, a higher percentage of non-asthmatic individuals (66.67%) report sufficient physical activity compared to asthmatic patients (33.33%)(P=0.005).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that asthma severity significantly impacts exercise capacity, as shown by shorter distances covered in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) among patients with severe asthma. While overall physical activity levels (measured by the IPAQ) were not significantly different between asthma and non-asthma groups, asthma patients exhibited significantly more sitting time, suggesting a more sedentary lifestyle.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估中重度支气管哮喘患者的运动能力:初步前瞻性观察研究。
目的:本研究的主要目的是评估支气管哮喘患者与非哮喘对照组相比的运动能力和身体活动水平,以及哮喘严重程度如何影响IPAQ问卷测量的6MWT和身体活动结果。患者和方法:共研究63例,分为两组:A组33例支气管哮喘患者,B组30例无支气管哮喘的普通人群。两组均进行了以下评估:6分钟步行测试(6MWT)、国际体育活动问卷(IPAQ)和Borg感知运动量表(Borg RPE量表)abg。结果:中度哮喘患者在6MWT期间的步行距离大于重度哮喘患者。两组之间所覆盖的米的差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001),这可以在步行测试中观察到。结果表明,与没有哮喘的患者(24%)相比,哮喘患者(76%)属于身体活动不足类别的比例更大。相反,与哮喘患者(33.33%)相比,非哮喘个体(66.67%)报告有足够的身体活动的比例更高(P=0.005)。结论:本研究表明,哮喘严重程度显著影响运动能力,这可以从严重哮喘患者6分钟步行测试(6MWT)中较短的步行距离看出。虽然哮喘组和非哮喘组的整体身体活动水平(由IPAQ测量)没有显著差异,但哮喘患者的坐着时间明显更长,这表明他们的生活方式更久坐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
185
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reports, editorials and commentaries on the following topics: Asthma; Pulmonary physiology; Asthma related clinical health; Clinical immunology and the immunological basis of disease; Pharmacological interventions and new therapies. Although the main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans, preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Characteristics of 31 Patients with Chest Pain Variant Asthma. Clinical Burden and Healthcare Resource Use of Asthma in Children in the UK. Computational Phenotyping of Obstructive Airway Diseases: A Systematic Review. The Joint Association of Sleep Quality and Outdoor Activity with Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study in Shanghai. Bibliometric Analysis of Global Pediatric Research on Cow's Milk Protein Allergy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1