Embedding clinical trial elements into clinical practice: Experiences from trial designers and implementers.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2024-10-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.647
Carrie Dombeck, Teresa Swezey, Lindsay Kehoe, Kraig Kinchen, Matthew Roe, Mark Stewart, Amy Corneli
{"title":"Embedding clinical trial elements into clinical practice: Experiences from trial designers and implementers.","authors":"Carrie Dombeck, Teresa Swezey, Lindsay Kehoe, Kraig Kinchen, Matthew Roe, Mark Stewart, Amy Corneli","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Researchers and policymakers recognize that leveraging data routinely collected in clinical practice can support improved research and patient care. Embedding elements of clinical trials, such as patient identification and trial data acquisition, into clinical practice can enable research access and increase efficiencies by reducing duplication of trial and care activities. Yet, cultural, administrative, and data barriers exist. The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) developed evidenced-based, multi-partner recommendations to facilitate embedding interventional, randomized trials into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) with trial designers and implementers to describe their motivations for embedding interventional, randomized trials into clinical practice. Additionally, we aimed to identify barriers and potential solutions to implementing such trials. Interviews were audio-recorded and analyzed using applied thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted 16 IDIs with 18 trial designers and implementers. Motivations for embedding trials into clinical practice included the desire to implement a learning health system and evaluate trials in real-world settings. Barriers to trial implementation focused on limited staff time and availability, the lack of buy-in, and difficulties using electronic health record data. Solutions included minimizing healthcare settings and patient burden, having a sufficient data and research infrastructure in place, and creating a culture change.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results informed CTTI recommendations to facilitate the design and operation of embedded trials. These recommendations emphasize areas where sponsors and investigators can rethink the design and conduct of clinical trials to ultimately realize an aligned system of research and care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Researchers and policymakers recognize that leveraging data routinely collected in clinical practice can support improved research and patient care. Embedding elements of clinical trials, such as patient identification and trial data acquisition, into clinical practice can enable research access and increase efficiencies by reducing duplication of trial and care activities. Yet, cultural, administrative, and data barriers exist. The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) developed evidenced-based, multi-partner recommendations to facilitate embedding interventional, randomized trials into clinical practice.

Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) with trial designers and implementers to describe their motivations for embedding interventional, randomized trials into clinical practice. Additionally, we aimed to identify barriers and potential solutions to implementing such trials. Interviews were audio-recorded and analyzed using applied thematic analysis.

Results: We conducted 16 IDIs with 18 trial designers and implementers. Motivations for embedding trials into clinical practice included the desire to implement a learning health system and evaluate trials in real-world settings. Barriers to trial implementation focused on limited staff time and availability, the lack of buy-in, and difficulties using electronic health record data. Solutions included minimizing healthcare settings and patient burden, having a sufficient data and research infrastructure in place, and creating a culture change.

Conclusion: The results informed CTTI recommendations to facilitate the design and operation of embedded trials. These recommendations emphasize areas where sponsors and investigators can rethink the design and conduct of clinical trials to ultimately realize an aligned system of research and care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将临床试验元素嵌入临床实践:来自试验设计者和实施者的经验。
研究人员和政策制定者认识到,利用临床实践中常规收集的数据可以支持改进研究和患者护理。将临床试验的要素(如患者识别和试验数据获取)纳入临床实践,可以使研究获得,并通过减少试验和护理活动的重复来提高效率。然而,文化、管理和数据障碍依然存在。临床试验转化倡议(CTTI)制定了基于证据的多合作伙伴建议,以促进将干预性随机试验纳入临床实践。方法:我们对试验设计者和实施者进行了深度访谈(IDIs),以描述他们将干预性随机试验纳入临床实践的动机。此外,我们旨在确定实施此类试验的障碍和潜在解决方案。访谈录音并使用应用专题分析进行分析。结果:共进行了16次IDIs,试验设计人员和实施者18人。将试验纳入临床实践的动机包括实施学习型卫生系统和在现实环境中评估试验的愿望。试验实施的障碍集中在工作人员时间和可用性有限、缺乏支持以及难以使用电子健康记录数据。解决方案包括最大限度地减少医疗保健设置和患者负担,拥有足够的数据和研究基础设施,以及创建文化变革。结论:这些结果为CTTI提供了建议,以促进嵌入式试验的设计和操作。这些建议强调了发起人和研究者可以重新思考临床试验设计和实施的领域,以最终实现研究和护理的一致系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Using technology to increase reach and optimize consent experience for a large-scale research program. Engaging stakeholders to strengthen support for community-engaged research at Stanford School of Medicine: An institutional assessment and action planning approach. A maturity model for Clinical Trials Management Ecosystem. Bioethical and critical consciousness in clinical translational neuroscience. Collaborating with and enabling diverse communities to address health inequities: The experiences of a community engagement and outreach team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1