Examining individual- versus population-level social determinants of health in a cluster randomized trial of health coaches for patients with multiple chronic conditions.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.598
Mary E Charlson, Martin T Wells, James Hollenberg, Rosio Ramos, Guillerma Maritza Martinez, Martin J Gerard, Andrea Cassells, T J Lin, Ilana Mittleman, Alice Eggleston, Jonathan N Tobin
{"title":"Examining individual- versus population-level social determinants of health in a cluster randomized trial of health coaches for patients with multiple chronic conditions.","authors":"Mary E Charlson, Martin T Wells, James Hollenberg, Rosio Ramos, Guillerma Maritza Martinez, Martin J Gerard, Andrea Cassells, T J Lin, Ilana Mittleman, Alice Eggleston, Jonathan N Tobin","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDOH) are an important contributor to health status and health outcomes. In this analysis, we compare SDOH measured both at the individual and population levels in patients with high comorbidity who receive primary care at Federally Qualified Health Centers in New York and Chicago and enrolled in the Tipping Points trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed individual- and population-level measures of SDOH in 1,488 patients with high comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 4) enrolled in Tipping Points. At the individual level, we used a standardized patient-reported questionnaire. At the population level, we employed patient addresses to calculate the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) and Area Deprivation Index. Multivariable regressions were conducted in addition to qualitative feedback from stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individual-level SDOH are distinct from population-level measures. Significant component predictors of population SDI are being unhoused, unable to pay for utilities, and difficulty accessing medical transportation. Qualitative findings mirrored these results. High comorbidity patients report significant SDOH challenges at the individual level. Fitting a binomial generalized linear model, the comorbidity score is significantly predicted by the composite individual SDOH index (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) controlling for age and race/ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individual- and population-level SDOH measures provide different risk assessments. The use of community-level SDI data is informative in the aggregate but should not be used to identify patients with individual unmet social needs. Health systems should implement a standardized individualized assessment of unmet SDOH needs and build strong, enduring partnerships with community-based organizations that can provide those services.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"e191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Social determinants of health (SDOH) are an important contributor to health status and health outcomes. In this analysis, we compare SDOH measured both at the individual and population levels in patients with high comorbidity who receive primary care at Federally Qualified Health Centers in New York and Chicago and enrolled in the Tipping Points trial.

Methods: We analyzed individual- and population-level measures of SDOH in 1,488 patients with high comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 4) enrolled in Tipping Points. At the individual level, we used a standardized patient-reported questionnaire. At the population level, we employed patient addresses to calculate the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) and Area Deprivation Index. Multivariable regressions were conducted in addition to qualitative feedback from stakeholders.

Results: Individual-level SDOH are distinct from population-level measures. Significant component predictors of population SDI are being unhoused, unable to pay for utilities, and difficulty accessing medical transportation. Qualitative findings mirrored these results. High comorbidity patients report significant SDOH challenges at the individual level. Fitting a binomial generalized linear model, the comorbidity score is significantly predicted by the composite individual SDOH index (p < 0.0001) controlling for age and race/ethnicity.

Conclusions: Individual- and population-level SDOH measures provide different risk assessments. The use of community-level SDI data is informative in the aggregate but should not be used to identify patients with individual unmet social needs. Health systems should implement a standardized individualized assessment of unmet SDOH needs and build strong, enduring partnerships with community-based organizations that can provide those services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一项针对多种慢性疾病患者的健康教练的集群随机试验中,检查个体与人群水平的健康社会决定因素。
健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)是健康状况和健康结果的重要贡献者。在本分析中,我们比较了在纽约和芝加哥联邦合格医疗中心接受初级保健并参加临界点试验的高合并症患者的个体和群体水平的SDOH。方法:我们分析了1,488名高合并症(Charlson合并症指数≥4)患者的个体和人群水平的SDOH测量值。在个体层面,我们使用了标准化的患者报告问卷。在人口水平上,我们采用患者地址计算社会剥夺指数(SDI)和地区剥夺指数(Area Deprivation Index)。除了利益相关者的定性反馈外,还进行了多变量回归。结果:个体水平的SDOH不同于人群水平的测量。人口SDI的重要组成部分预测因素是无家可归、无法支付水电费和难以获得医疗运输。定性研究结果反映了这些结果。高合并症患者在个体水平上报告了显著的SDOH挑战。拟合二项广义线性模型,综合个体SDOH指数显著预测合并症评分(p < 0.0001),控制了年龄和种族/民族。结论:个体和人群水平的SDOH措施提供了不同的风险评估。社区一级SDI数据的使用总体上提供了信息,但不应用于识别个体未满足社会需求的患者。卫生系统应对未满足的SDOH需求实施标准化的个性化评估,并与能够提供这些服务的社区组织建立牢固、持久的伙伴关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Health impacts of a remotely delivered prolonged nightly fasting intervention in stressed adults with memory decline and obesity: A nationwide randomized controlled pilot trial - ADDENDUM. Erratum: 489 Nasal-derived Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) carry a cargo of antiviral and immunomodulatory molecules - CORRIGENDUM. Local context review by single institutional review boards: Results from a modified Delphi process. Considerations and recommendations for collaborative research networks in epidemiology: Lessons learned from the diabetes LEAD Network. Training T-shaped translational scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1