Treatment adherence and effectiveness in patients treated with carfilzomib-based therapy combinations for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in Germany: interim results from the non-interventional CARO study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Leukemia & Lymphoma Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1080/10428194.2024.2436034
Wolfgang Knauf, Jens Uhlig, Eyck von der Heyde, Christoph Losem, Andreas Ammon, Arnd Nusch, Rudolf Schlag, Holger Schulz, Jan Janssen, Manfred Welslau, Stefan Wilop, Corinne Vannier, Hans Ulrich Siebenbach, Laura Serrer, Anita Schuch, Sandra Maria Woerner, Monika Engelhardt, Karin Potthoff
{"title":"Treatment adherence and effectiveness in patients treated with carfilzomib-based therapy combinations for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in Germany: interim results from the non-interventional CARO study.","authors":"Wolfgang Knauf, Jens Uhlig, Eyck von der Heyde, Christoph Losem, Andreas Ammon, Arnd Nusch, Rudolf Schlag, Holger Schulz, Jan Janssen, Manfred Welslau, Stefan Wilop, Corinne Vannier, Hans Ulrich Siebenbach, Laura Serrer, Anita Schuch, Sandra Maria Woerner, Monika Engelhardt, Karin Potthoff","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2024.2436034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapy adherence can significantly influence the outcome of cancer patients. The prospective, non-interventional CARO study (NCT02970747) investigated adherence, effectiveness, and safety of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the German real-world setting. In total, 359 patients were included at 69 sites. Data on carfilzomib combination regimens were evaluated for three treatment cohorts: carfilzomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd), with dexamethasone only (Kd) or with daratumumab and dexamethasone (KdD). Encouragingly, patients maintained levels of treatment adherence ≥95% to carfilzomib across cohorts. The effectiveness outcomes of CARO were in line with previous data. Median PFS (95% CI) was 17.5 months (14.5, 24.7 [KRd]), 13.4 months (7.0, 18.1 [Kd]), and 15.6 months (9.9, NA [KdD]), respectively. Median OS was 38.9 months (31.5, 53.9 [KRd]), 24.2 months (17.3, 36.8 [Kd]), and not reached (KdD). Overall, the CARO study impressively demonstrates efficacy and safety of KRd, Kd, and KdD regimen in real-world.</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2436034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapy adherence can significantly influence the outcome of cancer patients. The prospective, non-interventional CARO study (NCT02970747) investigated adherence, effectiveness, and safety of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the German real-world setting. In total, 359 patients were included at 69 sites. Data on carfilzomib combination regimens were evaluated for three treatment cohorts: carfilzomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd), with dexamethasone only (Kd) or with daratumumab and dexamethasone (KdD). Encouragingly, patients maintained levels of treatment adherence ≥95% to carfilzomib across cohorts. The effectiveness outcomes of CARO were in line with previous data. Median PFS (95% CI) was 17.5 months (14.5, 24.7 [KRd]), 13.4 months (7.0, 18.1 [Kd]), and 15.6 months (9.9, NA [KdD]), respectively. Median OS was 38.9 months (31.5, 53.9 [KRd]), 24.2 months (17.3, 36.8 [Kd]), and not reached (KdD). Overall, the CARO study impressively demonstrates efficacy and safety of KRd, Kd, and KdD regimen in real-world.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者接受卡非佐米联合治疗的依从性和有效性:非介入性CARO研究的中期结果
治疗依从性可以显著影响癌症患者的预后。这项前瞻性、非介入性的CARO研究(NCT02970747)调查了在德国现实环境中carfilzomib治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者的依从性、有效性和安全性。共纳入69个部位的359例患者。卡非佐米联合方案的数据在三个治疗队列中进行了评估:卡非佐米与来那度胺和地塞米松(KRd),单独与地塞米松(Kd)或达拉单抗和地塞米松(KdD)。令人鼓舞的是,患者对卡非佐米的治疗依从性维持在≥95%的水平。CARO的疗效结果与既往数据一致。中位PFS (95% CI)分别为17.5个月(14.5,24.7 [KdD])、13.4个月(7.0,18.1 [Kd])和15.6个月(9.9,NA [KdD])。中位OS为38.9个月(31.5,53.9 [Kd]), 24.2个月(17.3,36.8 [Kd]),未达到(KdD)。总的来说,CARO研究在现实世界中令人印象深刻地证明了KRd、Kd和KdD方案的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Leukemia & Lymphoma
Leukemia & Lymphoma 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
384
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor
期刊最新文献
Dose-adjusted direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with acute leukemia: experience of a tertiary cancer care center. Early impact of treatment modifications adopted for acute lymphoblastic leukemia during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic; a single center experience and lessons for LMICs. MicroRΝΑ analysis in patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms. Possible implications in risk stratification. Blinatumomab use in patients with CD19 positive B-ALL and hepatic dysfunction. Complete remission in a case of acute undifferentiated leukemia with novel combination therapy of FLAG-IDA and venetoclax.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1