Using the theory of Threshold Concepts to identify troublesome knowledge in becoming a Master Clinical Teacher.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2436454
Stephanie Hale, Matei Petrescu, Melissa Carbajal, Moushumi Sur, Audrea Burns, Satid Thammasitboon
{"title":"Using the theory of Threshold Concepts to identify troublesome knowledge in becoming a Master Clinical Teacher.","authors":"Stephanie Hale, Matei Petrescu, Melissa Carbajal, Moushumi Sur, Audrea Burns, Satid Thammasitboon","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2436454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is a wealth of literature describing the characteristics and proficiencies of clinical teachers, but no description exists of the obstacles that clinical teachers face when aspiring to become a Master Clinical Teacher (MCT). Using Threshold Concepts (TC) theory as an analytical framework can help investigate those potential challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a mixed-methods research integrating an exploratory survey and semi-structured interviews. The authors used a systematic approach to develop the survey and administered it to physicians in a large pediatrics department, using the results to inform the interview process. In the interview phase, the authors used purposive sampling of trainees, early-career clinical teachers, and departmentally recognized MCTs. The authors conducted reflexive thematic analysis on the qualitative data using TC as a framework, deriving areas of Troublesome Knowledge (TK) and subsequently conceptualizing TCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey phase yielded 143 responses with 303 narrative comments. The interview phase comprised three focus groups and eleven individual interviews with MCTs. Four themes were identified that conceptualize as TCs with associated areas of TK, including: Embracing continual personal and professional evolution; Cultivating shared vulnerability for authentic engagement and learning; Empowering learners for self-discovery and transformation; and Navigating the complexities of clinical teaching.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The identified TCs and associated TKs provide insights into clinical teachers' experience in becoming MCTs. These findings can inform faculty development efforts and the individual career development of clinical teachers and also underscore the dynamic and multi-faceted nature of clinical teaching and the ongoing evolution required to excel in it.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2436454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There is a wealth of literature describing the characteristics and proficiencies of clinical teachers, but no description exists of the obstacles that clinical teachers face when aspiring to become a Master Clinical Teacher (MCT). Using Threshold Concepts (TC) theory as an analytical framework can help investigate those potential challenges.

Methods: This is a mixed-methods research integrating an exploratory survey and semi-structured interviews. The authors used a systematic approach to develop the survey and administered it to physicians in a large pediatrics department, using the results to inform the interview process. In the interview phase, the authors used purposive sampling of trainees, early-career clinical teachers, and departmentally recognized MCTs. The authors conducted reflexive thematic analysis on the qualitative data using TC as a framework, deriving areas of Troublesome Knowledge (TK) and subsequently conceptualizing TCs.

Results: The survey phase yielded 143 responses with 303 narrative comments. The interview phase comprised three focus groups and eleven individual interviews with MCTs. Four themes were identified that conceptualize as TCs with associated areas of TK, including: Embracing continual personal and professional evolution; Cultivating shared vulnerability for authentic engagement and learning; Empowering learners for self-discovery and transformation; and Navigating the complexities of clinical teaching.

Conclusions: The identified TCs and associated TKs provide insights into clinical teachers' experience in becoming MCTs. These findings can inform faculty development efforts and the individual career development of clinical teachers and also underscore the dynamic and multi-faceted nature of clinical teaching and the ongoing evolution required to excel in it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:有大量文献描述临床教师的特点和熟练程度,但没有描述临床教师在立志成为临床硕士教师(MCT)时所面临的障碍。使用阈值概念(TC)理论作为分析框架可以帮助调查这些潜在的挑战。方法:采用探索性调查和半结构化访谈相结合的混合研究方法。作者采用了一种系统的方法来开展调查,并对一家大型儿科的医生进行了调查,并利用调查结果为访谈过程提供信息。在访谈阶段,作者对实习生、早期临床教师和部门认可的mct进行了有目的的抽样调查。作者以问题知识为框架,对定性数据进行了反思性专题分析,得出了问题知识的领域,并对问题知识进行了概念化。结果:调查阶段共收到143份反馈,303份叙述性评论。访谈阶段包括三个焦点小组和11个mct个人访谈。确定了四个主题,这些主题被概念化为与传统知识相关的领域,包括:接受持续的个人和专业发展;为真正的参与和学习培养共享的脆弱性;赋予学习者自我发现和自我转变的能力;以及驾驭临床教学的复杂性。结论:鉴定出的教学指导老师和相关的教学指导老师为临床教师成为教学指导老师的经验提供了见解。这些发现可以为教师发展努力和临床教师的个人职业发展提供信息,也强调了临床教学的动态和多面性,以及在临床教学中脱颖而出所需的持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
A randomised cross-over trial assessing the impact of AI-generated individual feedback on written online assignments for medical students. Assessing readability of explanations and reliability of answers by GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in non-traumatic spinal cord injury education. Balancing innovation and tradition: A critical reflection on the assessment PROFILE framework. Response to: "Rethinking peer evaluation in team-based learning". Response to: 'A confidentiality conundrum: Case tracking for medical education'.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1