Psychometric Properties of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale-II Self-Report.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Psychiatric Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1097/PRA.0000000000000823
Caitlin M Pinciotti, Catherine E Rast, Andrew D Wiese, Katherine L Foshee, Samuel D Spencer, Blake M Upshaw, Andrew G Guzick, Wayne K Goodman, Eric A Storch
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale-II Self-Report.","authors":"Caitlin M Pinciotti, Catherine E Rast, Andrew D Wiese, Katherine L Foshee, Samuel D Spencer, Blake M Upshaw, Andrew G Guzick, Wayne K Goodman, Eric A Storch","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is one of the most commonly used instruments for assessing and quantifying the presence and severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms. Both the interview and self-report (SR) versions of the original Y-BOCS have demonstrated good psychometrics. However, areas for revision were noted regarding the measure's severity ceiling and a \"resistance to obsessions\" item that did not perform adequately in psychometric testing and was not consistent with theoretical models of OCD. The Y-BOCS-II was thereby created to address these concerns. While the interview has demonstrated strong psychometrics, psychometric evaluation of the self-report version is currently nonexistent. In a sample of 63 adult patients seeking outpatient treatment for OCD (66.7% female, 77.8% white, and 17.5% Hispanic or Latine), we examined the psychometric properties of the Y-BOCS-II-SR, including the level of agreement with the Y-BOCS-II items, subscales, and severity qualifiers, as well as its internal consistency, and its convergent validity with measures of OCD, functional impairment, and quality of life. As expected, the Y-BOCS-II-SR demonstrated strong psychometric properties and expected overlap with responses obtained using the Y-BOCS-II. The findings provide strong initial support for the psychometric properties of the Y-BOCS-II-SR and suggest that it is an efficient and effective option to measure OCD severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"30 6","pages":"421-427"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000823","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is one of the most commonly used instruments for assessing and quantifying the presence and severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms. Both the interview and self-report (SR) versions of the original Y-BOCS have demonstrated good psychometrics. However, areas for revision were noted regarding the measure's severity ceiling and a "resistance to obsessions" item that did not perform adequately in psychometric testing and was not consistent with theoretical models of OCD. The Y-BOCS-II was thereby created to address these concerns. While the interview has demonstrated strong psychometrics, psychometric evaluation of the self-report version is currently nonexistent. In a sample of 63 adult patients seeking outpatient treatment for OCD (66.7% female, 77.8% white, and 17.5% Hispanic or Latine), we examined the psychometric properties of the Y-BOCS-II-SR, including the level of agreement with the Y-BOCS-II items, subscales, and severity qualifiers, as well as its internal consistency, and its convergent validity with measures of OCD, functional impairment, and quality of life. As expected, the Y-BOCS-II-SR demonstrated strong psychometric properties and expected overlap with responses obtained using the Y-BOCS-II. The findings provide strong initial support for the psychometric properties of the Y-BOCS-II-SR and suggest that it is an efficient and effective option to measure OCD severity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耶鲁-布朗强迫量表ii自我报告的心理测量特征。
耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)是评估和量化强迫症(OCD)症状的存在和严重程度最常用的工具之一。原始Y-BOCS的访谈和自我报告(SR)版本都显示出良好的心理测量学。然而,需要修订的地方是关于测量的严重程度上限和“抵抗强迫”项目,在心理测量测试中表现不充分,与强迫症的理论模型不一致。因此,Y-BOCS-II就是为了解决这些问题而设立的。虽然访谈显示了强大的心理测量学,但自我报告版本的心理测量学评估目前还不存在。在63名寻求强迫症门诊治疗的成年患者样本中(66.7%为女性,77.8%为白人,17.5%为西班牙裔或拉丁裔),我们检查了Y-BOCS-II- sr的心理测量特性,包括与Y-BOCS-II项目、子量表和严重程度限定词的一致性水平,以及其内部一致性,以及与强迫症、功能障碍和生活质量测量的收敛效度。正如预期的那样,Y-BOCS-II- sr显示出强烈的心理测量特性,并且预期与使用Y-BOCS-II获得的反应重叠。这些发现为Y-BOCS-II-SR的心理测量特性提供了强有力的初步支持,并表明它是测量强迫症严重程度的有效选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Psychiatric Practice® seizes the day with its emphasis on the three Rs — readability, reliability, and relevance. Featuring an eye-catching style, the journal combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with practical and informative tips for treating patients. Mental health professionals will want access to this review journal — for sharpening their clinical skills, discovering the best in treatment, and navigating this rapidly changing field. Journal of Psychiatric Practice combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with informative "how to" tips for surviving in a managed care environment.
期刊最新文献
Association of Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome and First Episode Psychosis: A Case Report. Because of γ-Aminobutyric Acid-Glutamate Imbalance, Gut Microbiota, or Both? Delirious Mania Induced by Ciprofloxacin Use: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. DSM-5-TR Clinical Cases. Evaluative Research on Psychodynamic Therapy: Foundations and Recent Advances. How Quickly Multiple Medication Use Can Start: A Medication for Every Complaint on the First Visit Compromising the Ability to Determine Cause and Effect.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1