The impact of nurses' stress situation coping on somatization: a mediated moderation model.

IF 2.4 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PeerJ Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.18658
Xiaoyan Qi, Hong-Ning Xu
{"title":"The impact of nurses' stress situation coping on somatization: a mediated moderation model.","authors":"Xiaoyan Qi, Hong-Ning Xu","doi":"10.7717/peerj.18658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of nurses' stress situation coping levels on somatization symptoms, the mediating effect of depression, and the moderating effect of perceived social support.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>As a core part of the global healthcare system, nurses are crucial to patient health and rehabilitation outcomes. However, due to heavy workloads, unreasonable staffing structures, and constant exposure to occupational risks in their workplaces, these factors often place nurses in a high-intensity, high-stress environment, which directly affects their physical and mental health and professional burnout. Coping with stress situations is an important means to help individuals effectively manage stress, reduce negative impacts, and maintain mental health. However, research on the impact of nurses' stress situation coping methods on somatization symptoms is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study conducted a cross-sectional survey from December 2022 to April 2023, and finally included 293 nurses working on the front line of tertiary hospitals. Data was collected through questionnaires and analyzed using SPSS 24.0 and the SPSS macro program's Models 7 and 14. This study is an observational study, strictly prepared and presented according to the STROBE checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The somatization symptom scores of the nurses were (27.27 ± 7.33) points, the stress situation coping scores were (59.90 ± 9.64) points, the perceived social support scores were (65.64 ± 12.90) points, and the depression scores were (4.42 ± 4.12) points. The somatization symptom scores of the nurses were positively correlated with the stress situation coping scores and depression scores, and negatively correlated with the perceived social support scores, with correlation coefficients of 0.200, 0.851, and -0.302, respectively. The stress coping level of the nurses had a direct positive impact on somatization symptoms (β = 0.081, <i>p</i> = 0.009), and a direct positive impact on nurse depression (β = 0.202, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Depression had a significant positive impact on somatization symptoms (β = 0.823, <i>p</i> = 0.000), and depression played a mediating role. Perceived social support had a significant negative impact on depression (β = -0.383, <i>p</i> = 0.000). Perceived social support had a significant moderating effect on the relationship between the stress situation coping level and depression (β = -0.121, <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, the stress situation coping methods of nurses had a positive impact on somatization symptoms, had a complete mediating effect on the depression level of nurses, and perceived social support had a significant moderating effect in the pathway from the stress situation coping methods of nurses to depression-mediated somatization symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19799,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ","volume":"12 ","pages":"e18658"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11627075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of nurses' stress situation coping levels on somatization symptoms, the mediating effect of depression, and the moderating effect of perceived social support.

Background: As a core part of the global healthcare system, nurses are crucial to patient health and rehabilitation outcomes. However, due to heavy workloads, unreasonable staffing structures, and constant exposure to occupational risks in their workplaces, these factors often place nurses in a high-intensity, high-stress environment, which directly affects their physical and mental health and professional burnout. Coping with stress situations is an important means to help individuals effectively manage stress, reduce negative impacts, and maintain mental health. However, research on the impact of nurses' stress situation coping methods on somatization symptoms is limited.

Methods: This study conducted a cross-sectional survey from December 2022 to April 2023, and finally included 293 nurses working on the front line of tertiary hospitals. Data was collected through questionnaires and analyzed using SPSS 24.0 and the SPSS macro program's Models 7 and 14. This study is an observational study, strictly prepared and presented according to the STROBE checklist.

Results: The somatization symptom scores of the nurses were (27.27 ± 7.33) points, the stress situation coping scores were (59.90 ± 9.64) points, the perceived social support scores were (65.64 ± 12.90) points, and the depression scores were (4.42 ± 4.12) points. The somatization symptom scores of the nurses were positively correlated with the stress situation coping scores and depression scores, and negatively correlated with the perceived social support scores, with correlation coefficients of 0.200, 0.851, and -0.302, respectively. The stress coping level of the nurses had a direct positive impact on somatization symptoms (β = 0.081, p = 0.009), and a direct positive impact on nurse depression (β = 0.202, p = 0.001). Depression had a significant positive impact on somatization symptoms (β = 0.823, p = 0.000), and depression played a mediating role. Perceived social support had a significant negative impact on depression (β = -0.383, p = 0.000). Perceived social support had a significant moderating effect on the relationship between the stress situation coping level and depression (β = -0.121, p = 0.003).

Conclusion: In this study, the stress situation coping methods of nurses had a positive impact on somatization symptoms, had a complete mediating effect on the depression level of nurses, and perceived social support had a significant moderating effect in the pathway from the stress situation coping methods of nurses to depression-mediated somatization symptoms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士应激情境应对对躯体化的影响:一个有中介的调节模型。
目的:本研究旨在探讨护士应激情境应对水平对躯体化症状的影响、抑郁的中介作用以及感知社会支持的调节作用。背景:作为全球医疗保健系统的核心部分,护士对患者的健康和康复结果至关重要。然而,由于工作量大、人员结构不合理、工作场所不断暴露于职业风险,这些因素往往使护士处于高强度、高压力的环境中,直接影响其身心健康和职业倦怠。应对压力是帮助个人有效管理压力,减少负面影响,保持心理健康的重要手段。然而,关于护士应激情境应对方式对躯体化症状影响的研究较少。方法:本研究于2022年12月至2023年4月对293名三级医院一线护士进行横断面调查。通过问卷调查收集数据,并使用SPSS 24.0和SPSS宏程序的模型7和14进行分析。本研究是一项观察性研究,严格按照STROBE检查表进行准备和呈现。结果:护士躯体化症状得分为(27.27±7.33)分,应激情境应对得分为(59.90±9.64)分,感知社会支持得分为(65.64±12.90)分,抑郁得分为(4.42±4.12)分。护士躯体化症状得分与应激情境应对得分、抑郁得分呈显著正相关,与感知社会支持得分呈显著负相关,相关系数分别为0.200、0.851、-0.302。护士压力应对水平对躯体化症状有直接正向影响(β = 0.081, p = 0.009),对抑郁有直接正向影响(β = 0.202, p = 0.001)。抑郁对躯体化症状有显著的正向影响(β = 0.823, p = 0.000),且抑郁具有中介作用。感知社会支持对抑郁有显著负向影响(β = -0.383, p = 0.000)。感知社会支持对应激情境应对水平与抑郁的关系有显著调节作用(β = -0.121, p = 0.003)。结论:在本研究中,护士应激情境应对方式对躯体化症状有正向影响,对护士抑郁水平有完全的中介作用,感知社会支持在护士应激情境应对方式到抑郁介导的躯体化症状的通路中有显著的调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PeerJ
PeerJ MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1665
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
期刊最新文献
Application of adaptive deep learning-based automatic segmentation in radiomics model for preoperative WHO/ISUP grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study with manual segmentation. Indobufen versus aspirin in dual antiplatelet therapy: a retrospective study of effects on serum uric acid levels and gout attacks in patients post-coronary stenting. Hiding in plain sight: description of a new species of Nyctibatrachus (Amphibia, Anura, Nyctibatrachidae) from the central Western Ghats, India. Identification of a GPR182-postive stem cell population that drives polyp progression in familial adenomatous polyposis. MetaPepticon: automated prediction of anticancer peptides from microbial genomes and metagenomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1