A Pilot Study of a Novel Dietary Intervention Targeting Ultra-Processed Food Intake.

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Science & Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-08 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/osp4.70029
Charlotte J Hagerman, Asher E Hong, Emma Jennings, Meghan L Butryn
{"title":"A Pilot Study of a Novel Dietary Intervention Targeting Ultra-Processed Food Intake.","authors":"Charlotte J Hagerman, Asher E Hong, Emma Jennings, Meghan L Butryn","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are harmful to health but ubiquitous in the modern food environment, comprising almost 60% of the average American diet. This study assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a novel behavioral intervention designed to reduce UPF intake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen adults participated in an 8-week pilot intervention, which consisted of weekly group sessions, individual meal planning sessions, and financial support. Dietary intake was assessed using three Automated Self-Administered 24-h Dietary Recalls (ASA24) at both baseline and post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention was highly feasible and acceptable. Qualitative data demonstrated that participants were enthusiastic about the benefits of reducing UPF intake and found the intervention highly valuable. Participants reduced average daily calories from UPF by 48.9%, number of UPFs consumed by almost half, total daily calorie intake by 612 calories/day, sodium consumption by 37% and sugar consumption by 50%. There were no significant changes in fruit or vegetable intake. Participants lost an average of 3.5 kg (SD = 3.0 kg).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot data suggests that behavioral interventions to reduce UPF intake will be well-received and are capable of success despite the barriers of the United States food environment. Future research should prioritize behavioral interventions targeting UPF consumption alongside policy changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"10 6","pages":"e70029"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.70029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are harmful to health but ubiquitous in the modern food environment, comprising almost 60% of the average American diet. This study assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a novel behavioral intervention designed to reduce UPF intake.

Methods: Fourteen adults participated in an 8-week pilot intervention, which consisted of weekly group sessions, individual meal planning sessions, and financial support. Dietary intake was assessed using three Automated Self-Administered 24-h Dietary Recalls (ASA24) at both baseline and post-treatment.

Results: The intervention was highly feasible and acceptable. Qualitative data demonstrated that participants were enthusiastic about the benefits of reducing UPF intake and found the intervention highly valuable. Participants reduced average daily calories from UPF by 48.9%, number of UPFs consumed by almost half, total daily calorie intake by 612 calories/day, sodium consumption by 37% and sugar consumption by 50%. There were no significant changes in fruit or vegetable intake. Participants lost an average of 3.5 kg (SD = 3.0 kg).

Conclusion: This pilot data suggests that behavioral interventions to reduce UPF intake will be well-received and are capable of success despite the barriers of the United States food environment. Future research should prioritize behavioral interventions targeting UPF consumption alongside policy changes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项针对超加工食品摄入的新型饮食干预的初步研究。
背景:超加工食品(UPF)对健康有害,但在现代食品环境中却无处不在,几乎占美国人平均饮食的 60%。本研究评估了一种旨在减少UPF摄入量的新型行为干预的可行性、可接受性和初步效果:14名成年人参加了为期8周的试点干预,其中包括每周一次的小组会议、个人膳食计划会议和经济支持。在基线和治疗后,使用三次自动自控24小时饮食回顾(ASA24)对饮食摄入量进行评估:结果:这项干预措施非常可行,也很容易被接受。定性数据显示,参与者对减少 UPF 摄入量的益处充满热情,并认为干预非常有价值。参与者从 UPF 中摄入的日均卡路里减少了 48.9%,摄入的 UPF 数量减少了近一半,日均总卡路里摄入量减少了 612 卡路里,钠摄入量减少了 37%,糖摄入量减少了 50%。水果和蔬菜的摄入量没有明显变化。参与者的体重平均减轻了 3.5 公斤(标准偏差 = 3.0 公斤):这一试点数据表明,尽管美国的食品环境存在诸多障碍,但减少 UPF 摄入量的行为干预措施将会受到欢迎,并且能够取得成功。未来的研究应优先考虑针对UPF摄入量的行为干预措施以及政策改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity Science & Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Weight Stigma in Gynecological Care Among Cisgender Women. Centering Weight Management Clinical Decision Support in Primary Care on Patients With Obesity and Practitioners: A Proof-Of-Concept Study. Practical Awareness-Based Strategies for Eating (PASE): A Pilot and Feasibility Randomized Trial. Weight Stigma and Orthopedic Surgeons' Treatment Preferences for Patients With Obesity Who Are Candidates for Elective Total Knee Arthroplasty. Motivational Interviewing (MI) in Obesity Care: Cultivating Person-Centered and Supportive Clinical Conversations to Reduce Stigma: A Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1