Efficacy and Safety of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Real-World Studies.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Targeted Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1007/s11523-024-01118-0
Hui-Chen Su, Ho-Wei Lin, Ka-Wai Tam
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Real-World Studies.","authors":"Hui-Chen Su, Ho-Wei Lin, Ka-Wai Tam","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01118-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy and safety of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer have been investigated by large-scale trials sponsored by drug companies. A lack of real-world evidence may lead to biases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We systematically reviewed the large-scale clinical trials and real-world data to investigate the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from the inception of each database to January 2024. We included both prospective and retrospective studies reporting the survival outcomes or adverse effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 41 prospective trials and 80 retrospective studies involving a total of 69,535 patients. Our meta-analysis of double-arm studies revealed that all types of CDK4/6 inhibitors significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival. The pooled estimates of the 1-year overall survival (OS) rates and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates in single-arm real-world studies were 74.8% and 49.4% for abemaciclib, 84.1% and 55.7% for palbociclib, and 93.4% and 62.2% for ribobiclib, respectively. In terms of adverse effects, Asian patients were significantly more likely to experience neutropenia and increased alanine aminotransferase, whereas Western patients were significantly more likely to have grade 3 or 4 adverse effects and constipation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CDK4/6 inhibitors can improve OS and PFS in patients with advanced breast cancer. The incidence of adverse effects may differ with drugs and with ethnicity. On the basis of our findings, clinicians can select suitable CDK4/6 inhibitors for patients by conducting thorough clinical evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"71-88"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Targeted Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01118-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer have been investigated by large-scale trials sponsored by drug companies. A lack of real-world evidence may lead to biases.

Objective: We systematically reviewed the large-scale clinical trials and real-world data to investigate the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer.

Patients and methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from the inception of each database to January 2024. We included both prospective and retrospective studies reporting the survival outcomes or adverse effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer.

Results: We included 41 prospective trials and 80 retrospective studies involving a total of 69,535 patients. Our meta-analysis of double-arm studies revealed that all types of CDK4/6 inhibitors significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival. The pooled estimates of the 1-year overall survival (OS) rates and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates in single-arm real-world studies were 74.8% and 49.4% for abemaciclib, 84.1% and 55.7% for palbociclib, and 93.4% and 62.2% for ribobiclib, respectively. In terms of adverse effects, Asian patients were significantly more likely to experience neutropenia and increased alanine aminotransferase, whereas Western patients were significantly more likely to have grade 3 or 4 adverse effects and constipation.

Conclusions: CDK4/6 inhibitors can improve OS and PFS in patients with advanced breast cancer. The incidence of adverse effects may differ with drugs and with ethnicity. On the basis of our findings, clinicians can select suitable CDK4/6 inhibitors for patients by conducting thorough clinical evaluations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂在乳腺癌患者中的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验和真实世界研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDK)4/6抑制剂在乳腺癌患者中的有效性和安全性已经通过制药公司赞助的大规模试验进行了研究。缺乏真实证据可能会导致偏见。目的:系统回顾大规模临床试验和真实世界数据,探讨CDK4/6抑制剂治疗乳腺癌患者的有效性和安全性。患者和方法:我们检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,从每个数据库建立到2024年1月。我们纳入了前瞻性和回顾性研究,报告了CDK4/6抑制剂在乳腺癌患者中的生存结局或不良反应。结果:我们纳入了41项前瞻性试验和80项回顾性研究,共涉及69,535例患者。我们对双臂研究的荟萃分析显示,所有类型的CDK4/6抑制剂都显著提高了总生存期和无进展生存期。在单臂现实世界研究中,abemaciclib的1年总生存率(OS)和1年无进展生存率(PFS)的汇总估计分别为74.8%和49.4%,palbociclib为84.1%和55.7%,ribobiclib为93.4%和62.2%。在不良反应方面,亚洲患者明显更容易出现中性粒细胞减少症和谷丙转氨酶升高,而西方患者明显更容易出现3级或4级不良反应和便秘。结论:CDK4/6抑制剂可改善晚期乳腺癌患者的OS和PFS。不良反应的发生率可能因药物和种族而异。根据我们的发现,临床医生可以通过全面的临床评估为患者选择合适的CDK4/6抑制剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Targeted Oncology
Targeted Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Targeted Oncology addresses physicians and scientists committed to oncology and cancer research by providing a programme of articles on molecularly targeted pharmacotherapy in oncology. The journal includes: Original Research Articles on all aspects of molecularly targeted agents for the treatment of cancer, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and related approaches. Comprehensive narrative Review Articles and shorter Leading Articles discussing relevant clinically established as well as emerging agents and pathways. Current Opinion articles that place interesting areas in perspective. Therapy in Practice articles that provide a guide to the optimum management of a condition and highlight practical, clinically relevant considerations and recommendations. Systematic Reviews that use explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established targeted drugs in oncology.
期刊最新文献
Checkpoint Inhibition Prior to Stem Cell Transplantation Increases the Risk of Inflammatory Adverse Events. The User's Guide to Amivantamab. Multiple Myeloma: Improved Outcomes Resulting from a Rapidly Expanding Number of Therapeutic Options. Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Real-World Experience at Hospitals in Spain. Bosutinib for the Treatment of CML-Using it Safely: a Podcast.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1